tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7723595150423976130.post1868578470667884354..comments2022-08-31T13:21:11.928+02:00Comments on webdiary_<i>libre</i>: AusBC plus Barker in the Middle East equalsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7723595150423976130.post-144429101223570182009-10-20T15:35:09.353+02:002009-10-20T15:35:09.353+02:00what Barker and the AusBC *actively support*
.. ...what Barker and the AusBC *actively support*<br /> <br />.. cynical recycling of a "peace process" ...<br /> <br /> .. widely recognized to be both a fraud and a farce ...<br /> <br /> .. reward and perpetuate ethnic cleansing, racism and apartheid<br /> <br />(Me: As well as supporting the 'original sin' of allowing the I/J/Z-plex to dispossess the Palestinians in the 1st place - then turning blind-eyes to the preceding terrorism, subsequent genocide, continual murder for land-theft etc. - the list *shockingly*, *inexcusably*, *inhumanely* looong.)<br /> <br />-=*=-<br /> <br />The above 'snips' in full; as exactly what Barker and the AusBC are *actively supporting*:<br /> <br /> <i>«... continued cynical recycling of a partition-based "peace process" which is now widely recognized to be both a fraud and a farce and which, even if "successful", would simply legitimise, reward and perpetuate ethnic cleansing, racism and apartheid --»</i> <br /> <br />As opposed to what they could <i><b>*and should*</b></i> support:<br /> <br /> <i>«Democracy and equal rights in a unitary state in the land which, until 1948, was called Palestine, coupled with freedom of choice (with attractive choices for resettlement being generously provided) for those who would prefer not to live in such a state, would offer a far greater hope for eventual peace in the Middle East than ...»</i> <br /> <br />The above two full 'snips' are in reverse order; and conclude with:<br /> <br /> <i>«-- scarcely a recipe for lasting peace, let alone for any measure of justice.»</i> <br /> <br />See the whole thing here:<br /> <br />October 19, 2009<br />A Tragically Bad and Unsustainable Idea<br />Zionism: an Anti-Semite's Dream?<br />By JOHN V. WHITBECK<br /> <i>«If Western politicians cared more about the welfare and happiness of individual Jewish human beings than they do about the money and ability to hurt them of a few wealthy and powerful Zionists, most of whom live comfortably and safely far from the Middle East, democracy, equal rights and freedom of choice, all principles to which Western states profess devotion, might actually come to the "Holy Land".<br />Politicians being what they are, civil society will have to take the lead in delegitimizing Zionism and pointing the way toward a better future for all concerned -- and, like it or not, everyone on this planet is concerned.»</i> <br />[<a href="http://counterpunch.com/whitbeck10192009.html" rel="nofollow">counterpunch/whitbeck</a>]<br /> <br />Note that the last bit means that the sheople must kick the politicians, implying that without being so kicked (hard! Right up their bums, until their noses bleed!) - politicians will *not* do right (as in correct) & responsible things.<br /> <br />So much for 'leadership;' so much for their 'representing.'<br /> <br />-=*end*=-<br /> <br />PS Another <i><b>strong</b></i> condemnation is the use, as above and <i>continually</i> by the AusBC, of the misleading and totally inappropriate expression <i>"Holy Land".</i> Qs: Holy to whom? What, exactly is 'holy' anyway? Vast numbers believe in *some other* g*d, or (better, best) *no* g*d at all.<br /> <br />A: 'Holy' belongs only in a church or mosque perhaps, *not* in politics, and even more *not* in the sheople's AusBC. Boo! Hiss!<br /> IDHolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01952349876651823852noreply@blogger.com