tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7723595150423976130.post8961236187928093742..comments2022-08-31T13:21:11.928+02:00Comments on webdiary_<i>libre</i>: the AusBC the Liberal party and all their filthy liesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7723595150423976130.post-18903270842004472782012-12-16T16:19:40.481+01:002012-12-16T16:19:40.481+01:00What I said, re: Scuds.
Saturday, December 15, 20...What I said, re: Scuds.<br /><br />Saturday, December 15, 2012<br />NATO Turns Up Heat in Syria Psy-War<br />NATO tells tales of recently launched "Scud missiles" to retroactively justify Patriot missile deployment months in the making.<br />Tony Cartalucci, Contributor<br />Activist Post<br />[<a href="http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/nato-turns-up-heat-in-syria-psy-war.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/nato-turns-up-heat-in-syria-psy-war.html</a>]<br /><br />"A force on the verge of real victory does not need to fabricate gains to psychologically diminish the strength of its opponent - real gains, even if embellished, have significantly greater impact. Despite claims made by the Western media - much of what is said by analysts are best guesses."<br /><br />Q: Did the MSM + PFBCs lie again?<br /><br />A: Not so much again - but still.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7723595150423976130.post-3979926310674433032012-12-14T13:41:09.750+01:002012-12-14T13:41:09.750+01:00Here are two articles which may extend/explain the...Here are two articles which may extend/explain the Syria stories in the headline article a bit:<br /><br />1. "<a href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/207265" rel="nofollow">Scud missiles fired at rebels</a>" @ whatreallyhappened.com/ and<br /><br />2. "<a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2012/12/13/us-sees-vindication-in-syrian-rebellion-from-single-russian-officials-comment/" rel="nofollow">US Sees Vindication ...</a>" @ antiwar.com - you could read 'em both; they're short...<br /><br />Now, the MSM + PFBCs keep saying 'reports cannot be confirmed,' giving themselves 'excuses' for any lies detected in their 'stenography.'<br /><br />The 1st article doubts "scuds," the 2nd doubts "imminent fall."<br /><br />You may decide who has what degree of credibility.<br /><br />Q: Why does it matter?<br /><br />A1: Because it's wrong = criminal; US/Zs invading to murder for spoil is the 'ultimate' war crime, <i>à la</i> Nuremberg trials.<br /><br />A2: Because these wars distract from the world's *biggest* problem = XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe.<br /><br />A3: Possibly worst, that there is no effective countervailing power active to stop the crimes and return the world to "the Enlightenment" path of human progress towards a better world for *all* of us, we the people - in contrast to illegal wars and erring-ideology neoliberalism further enriching the already obscenely rich <1%, and benefiting any Jews not already in that <1%.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com