a 'quickie' to Alan Kohler an AusBC 'economist'

.. if laid end-to-end ...

  .. all the world's economists ...

    .. would not reach a *valid* conclusion

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: ~35 years of TINA! = voodoo economics

Concomitant: and almost all we have to show for it

Corollary: is massive debt + unemployment

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Four years on, the economy is failing once more
 By ABC's Alan Kohler
Updated November 28, 2012 10:03:23
  «In 2008, the threat of a global economic catastrophe spurred politicians on to take preventive action. But this time around, the will just doesn't seem to be there, writes Alan Kohler.» 
[AusBC/Kohler]

Comment 1: There was little to no 'preventive action' - on various grounds; Rudd was one of the few who went 'classic Keynesian' (with apparent success), most others just used 'band-aids' - except where the banks were 'bailed out' = criminal.

Comment 2: 'Classic Keynesian' is mostly banned, by the (erring!) neoliberal ideology.

Comment 3: What I submitted to the (ugly, tyrannical) AusBC moderation process, delineated by { }:

{The 'standard discourse' - which Kohler is part of (not necessarily his *personal* fault, but he does choose to take part) - cannot acknowledge certain things, whilst actively suppressing others.

Kohler writes "But that is impossible because it is caught in an austerity loop where a fiscal multiplier larger than one is amplifying the impact on the economy of budget cutbacks."

 - which accords with the theory I learnt 'back then' - but is now largely ignored - see my into-para.

Now see Ellen Brown, "It’s the Interest, Stupid!" wherein is written: "In the 2012 edition of Occupy Money released last week, Professor Margrit Kennedy writes that a stunning 35% to 40% of everything we buy goes to interest."

It's easy to see how this might occur; each 'stage' in the production process (primary producer, wholesaler/distributor then retailer, plus possibly 'landlords' all round) - all depend partly on credit, the % on which is simply passed on = stacked up - horrendous!

Then, neoliberalism = cut taxes (easy; mainly off the rich) and cut govt. services 'to match' - but difficult, since many people actually depend on govt. services...

At the same time, they privatise govt. monopolies (Telstra, electricity, etc.) - which quickly results in higher prices (der!) - because of the profits now added on = ripped off.

The worst is medicine for profit, whereby profit takes precedence over results - see the US.

Then, there's "The Remarkable Model Of The Commonwealth Bank Of Australia" - more Ellen Brown.

Long story short: We the people are being sold-out to the banksters; IF Ellen Brown can work it out THEN many others can too - like our politicians, say. That those politicians nevertheless work *against* ours, we the people's interests - speaks volumes; the only really helpful response may be: Tumbrels.}

-=*=-

PS AusBC comments are limited to ~500 words, 200 preferred; the above submit was counted at 301 by MSWord. What could be added (absent haste, word-limits, and the *ever present* threat of AusBC-moderator censorship) - is this: There are better systems 'out there' but are excluded because of such things as the "Washington Consensus," "World Bank," "IMF" and especially neoliberalism - just a few terms which together spell *US/bankster tyranny*. Then ask yourself this: Who are the US' 'special little darlings?' (Tip: Murderers for soil.) Ah!

-=*=-

PPS IF you are puzzled, dear reader, THEN it may be because you have not yet read my two EB citations...

the story of Israel's illegitimacy in 97 neutral words

criminality test:

 means, motive and opportunity + modus operandi and cui bono?

means: Meir, $US50mio for arms

motive: Herzl, Zionism

opportunity: Balfour, Holocaust, UNGA181

modus operandi: Jabotinsky = violence; Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin++ = ethnic cleansing by genocidal methods = crimes against humanity

cui bono? Only Zs; US(UK+) help, partly against own interests = traitorous accessories

worse;

more criminality: UNSC242 *inadmissibility of acquisition by war*

 ->Israel squats almost entirely on stolen land/property

perfidy: UNGA273 - promised but never honoured 181 & 194

blasphemy: 'some g-d promised them'

lies meant to deceive: hasbarah

much worse;

immigration (Aliyah Bet); partly illegal = alien invasion

Zs not wanted = aggression

aggression = Nuremberg

Nuremberg = gallows

QED

PPS to 'vile Z-criminality' proof by direct observation vs. (lying!) hasbarah assertion

.. 1. what I said - burglary/home invasion ...

  .. 2. what I said - UN corruption, accessories ...

    .. 3. warning on wiki - it's quite possibly undermined

Thesis/Subtitle: it is not *who* says, but *what* is said

Concomitant: it's not what's *said* but what's *done*

Corollary: an entity based on crime is illegitimate

-=*=-

Preamble: This post started life as a PPS to my "proof of vile criminality" article, but deserves to stand alone.

The wicked villainy of the I/J/Z-plex in Palestine did not end in 1967 - it is ongoing = continuous to the 'current moment,' as the vicious attacks on Gaza this past week or so clearly demonstrate.

The attacks are illegal; the world's 4th military power, also the world's most militarised entity, on a 'turkey-shoot' against the I/J/Z-plex' hapless victims, armed with little more than AK-47s and fireworks-like = primitive rockets. Israel the aggressive occupier, attacks those the Zs improperly = illegally dispossessed.

For those paying close attention, the attacks are *clearly* illegal, but the illegality is 'masked' to the general public by a) world 'leaders' and b) their running-dogs = MSM + PFBCs erroneous statements = pro-Israel propaganda.

Those who support criminals make themselves criminals by the accessory-process - what a shitty, corrupt world!

There can be no justice without prosecution & restitution.

There can be no peace without justice.

End preamble.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

It's Palestinians Who Have the Right to Defend Themselves
The US and Britain stand behind Israel's onslaught on Gaza. Justice requires a change in the balance of forces on the ground
By Seumas Milne
November 21, 2012
"The Guardian"
  «The way western politicians and media have pontificated about Israel's onslaught on Gaza, you'd think it was facing an unprovoked attack from a well-armed foreign power. Israel had every "right to defend itself", Barack Obama declared...
He was echoed by Britain's foreign secretary, William Hague, who declared that the Palestinian Islamists of Hamas bore "principal responsibility" for Israel's bombardment ...
In fact, an examination of the sequence of events over the last month shows that Israel played the decisive role in the military escalation ... and, crucially, the assassination of the Hamas commander Ahmed Jabari last Wednesday during negotiations over a temporary truce.
...
It's that to portray Israel as some kind of victim ... is a grotesque inversion of reality. Israel has after all been in illegal occupation of both the West Bank and Gaza, where most of the population are the families of refugees who were driven out of what is now Israel in 1948, for the past 45 years.» 
[ICH/guardian/Milne]

Comment 1: What I said - burglary/home invasion ...

Comment 2: As I said in my "no, Mr president," perpetrators of a crime, here ethnic cleansing by genocidal methods have *no* right to defend the proceeds of such crime.

-=*=-

Trigger article 2:

Destroying International Law And Moral Norms
How Many Children will Israel Be Allowed To Slaughter?
By Stuart Littlewood
November 20, 2012
  «Despite the piles of dead in Gaza and - for the second time in four years - the row upon row of charred and broken little bodies of children, Western leaders still shirk their duty and call on the two parties to restart the squalid, lopsided peace process that had led nowhere and only serves to give the Israelis more time to consolidate their territorial gains.
Instead of carrying out their responsibilities, they shamelessly shovel their foul mess onto the Palestinians to clean up. What are the Palestinians supposed to negotiate? Why should they have to bargain for their freedom and property with the thugs that stole it?» 
[ICH/Littlewood]

Comment 1: What I said - UN corruption, accessories ...

Comment 2: The Littlewood article lists some more (but I assume not all) UN resolutions Israel violates, then there's the great swag of resolutions that never actually 'made it' - due to US vetoes. *This* is one way how the UN is corrupted; never a good look. Then, there's the UN corruption in respect to Iran; wickedness almost without end.

-=*=-

Trigger article 3:

EI exclusive: a pro-Israel group’s plan to rewrite history on Wikipedia
  «A pro-Israel pressure group is orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged.» 
[whatreallyhappened/electronicintifada]

Comment: IMHO, corruption of wiki is already underway. Take the '47-8 war in Palestine. Wiki claims 'civil war' - whereas I say 'alien invasion.'

Lemma: Wiki's declared m.o. includes favouring opinion (otherwise unsubstantiated, but where so-called 'experts' agree), which may overrule (unconsidered = missing, say) facts. The opportunities for corruption are clear - when, say, wiki favours *Jewish* opinion on Palestinian Qs?

Proof: Jews were in the great *minority* in Palestine, when Herzl revved Zionism up. By Jabotinsky's "Iron Wall," Jewish purchases in Palestine had effectively stalled. Jabotinsky suggested theft-by-violence and that's exactly what was inflicted on the hapless, mostly Palestinian ELO/Os. That's what the immigrant (partly illegal, Aliyah Bet) = *invading* Zs did = aggressive, alien invasion (= Nuremberg-class war crime), *not* civil war. All illegitimacy of Israel proceeds from this obvious, visible crime = murder for soil. QED.

-=*=-

Argument: Almost all the time, from almost all of the 'Western' MSM + PFBCs, we get almost all reports 'as seen' from the (criminal, lying) Israeli side, with only occasional mention from the point of view of Israel's victims (the hapless, mostly Palestinian ELO/Os, their heirs and successors).

My personal proof of press perfidy stems from ~1967, when I was deceived = propagandised by the erring = lying narrative of 'brave' Israel facing unjustified Arab attack; the exact opposite = "grotesque inversion" of reality - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to the AusBC, my almost sole source of 'current affairs' = news. The AusBC, as Israel, remains an un-remedied crime-scene.

-=*=-

Fazit: IF we the people want a better world - and I can't imagine that the great majority doesn't - THEN we have to work for *less* crime, rather than *more* crime = mainly US + Zs' + SQSHsO depredations. Since almost *all* power is out of our, we the people's hands, due to the tyrannical behaviour of our so-called 'leaders,' either those leaders get effectively active (but recall tigers changing their spots) - or we the people will have to get effectively active on behalf of truth and justice, with proper prosecutions of *all* perpetrators = wicked prime offenders + their cowardly accessories.

Suggestion: After prosecution comes punishment (range = gaol -> gallows), plus full reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

-=*=-

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

proof of vile criminality by Israel plus accessories

posit: that Israel is an illegitimate, criminal and cancerous entity (*not* a State), which causes misery and destruction, begetting ever more corruption as it lies, cheats and murders to steal.

-=*=-
 
 [update, 14:41]

-=*=-

Preamble: "It is not simple!" - OK, so step-by-step;

Any crime-investigation considers means, motive and opportunity + modus operandi and cui bono?

Associating the first three with an alleged perpetrator is usually enough for a conviction; all five = an 'open and shut' case.

The crimes under consideration are a) crimes against humanity and b) war crimes of the Nuremberg-class.

The crime scene is pre-UNGA181 Palestine, the time-frame is from 1897 at the latest, right down to the 'current moment.'

The accused are parts of the I/J/Z-plex, the alleged prime-perpetrators are the Jewish immigrants to pre-UNGA181 Palestine, their heirs and successors.

The alleged victims are mainly Palestinian ELO/Os, their heirs and successors, many now resident in the miserable mini-Bantustans they've been squeezed into by murdering force.

The alleged accessories are the UK, US + other SQSHsO *regimes* plus the UN and lastly, the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs like the AusBC.

A note on crime; the definition depends partly on the law; IF the law itself is inadequate or corrupt = 'an ass' = 'contrary to common sense' say, THEN one must revise it or its effect - since only just law may earn respect.

The tightly-focussed intent is to show necessary and sufficient proof-by-result, so we can identify the enemies of humanity, truth & justice. Some points may occur in multiples, if thought helpful.

-=*=-

This blog-item is part of and repeats some material from a loose group of recent items:

• bipedal brutal pigs
• perverse politicians criminal Jews/Zionists corrupt UN justice ...
• are Hague and Netanyahu a) liars, b) idiots or c) criminals?
• hey you 'leaders!' - got any balls at all? stop the Zs slaughtering!
• vile Anglo/Judaic conspiracy *proof* of AusBC, Aus-govt. perfidy ...
• Why doesn't the world stop the barbarian Jews?
• mass-murdering for soil ethnic cleansing genocide
• Mr Samson I presume - do you nuke?
• no, Mr president; Israel has no right of self defence
• the I/J/Z-plex illegit-morality threatens us all

End preamble.

-=*=-

The case for the prosecution:

1) motive Herzl(1897): coveting land-not-theirs formalised;

 "expropriation [of land/property] and the removal [of ELO/Os]"

2) accessory Balfour(1917): UK agrees to Z-interference;

 "do not propose ... to consult them [existing natives]"

3) means Jabotinsky(~1923): analysis + strategy;

 "No native population would stomach the intrusion ... Unremitting force"

4) method immigration by Jews into Palestine (1934-48), partly illegal (Aliyah Bet) = alien invasion

5) method Ben-Gurion(1936-39): analysis + strategy;

 "“We ... are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending ... [they] own the land"

Comment: aliens attack natives = Nuremberg-class war crime

Proof of Zionist criminality

6) method UNGA181(1947): *Partition into two states*

Comment: thought to violate the UN charter; no UNSC action = not law

Comment: not enforced (see UNGA273), to the 'current moment'

7) means Meir(1948): raised $US50mio from diaspora for arms

8) modus operandi Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin(1948) = ethnic-cleansing using genocidal attacks

Comment: Deir Yassin is but one outrage; such continue to 'current moment'

Comment: aliens attack natives = Nuremberg-class war crime

Proof of Zionist criminality

9) method unilateral declaration of independence(1948): no basis in law

10) accessory Truman(1948): US-interference, recognition

Comment: thought for electoral reasons - plus US coveting of ME oil

10) accessory UNGA194(1948): *right of return*

Comment: not enforced (see UNGA273), to the 'current moment'

11) accessory UNGA273(1949): *Israel, UN membership*

Comment: Israel promised to honour 'Charter obligations,' UNGA181 & UNGA194

Comment: not enforced, to the 'current moment'

Proof of Israeli perfidy; still no Palestinian state, still no return.

12) modus operandi 'war of Z's choice'(1967)

Comment: aggressive war = more Nuremberg-class war crime

Proof of Israeli criminality

13) modus operandi Israeli attacks USS Liberty(1967): 34 dead, 170+ wounded

Proof of more Israeli perfidy plus criminality

14) accessory UNSC242(1967): *inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war*

Comment: not enforced, to the 'current moment'

Comment: By not stopping crime, the UN makes itself an accessory.

Cui bono? = who benefits? Only Israel 'for sure,' possibly US since the US is still number one supporter, but could be coerced, mistaken, both and/or worse. The US is attacking other ME countries (murdering for oil, hegemony) - so we suppose that the US is 'co-defendant' here.

Prosecution gives summary; no one stops the Israeli crimes, not the UN, the US, UK or any other SQSHsO, the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs almost always favour the Zionist lying hasbarah over the truth; the Jews are portrayed as the eternal victims - when it's the ELO/Os who a) suffer aggressive attack including being murdered, b) are improperly dispossessed = Israel squats on stolen land/property - and c) so it criminally goes.

A real shocker, 64+ years since the Nakba.

Then the judge's Q: How do you say?

Jury: Guilty, your honour.

-=*end*=-

^ Update, 14:41; PS Arrrgh! Left something out, namely:

opportunity The Holocaust; Jews preying on (questionably invoked) sympathy.

This is *not* to doubt the gas-ovens, merely to query the numbers being spruiked. One thing almost everyone should know by now, is that the Jews/Zionists are *inveterate liars*. They even have a special name for lies in connection to Israel, namely 'hasbarah' = 'explanation.' We *know* that hasbarah includes lies, since hasbarah *never* admits to the quite visible fact, verifiable by the most casual inspection - that Israel illegally, immorally squats on stolen land/property. That they must lie is explained by the 'natural' phenomenon, that criminals can never afford to tell the truth about their own crimes - else they would convict themselves. 'Nice' little loop!

The 'push' to steal most of Palestine was well underway before WW2, but most of the real action (= crimes against humanity) took place after - making their constant harping on 'the Holocaust' little more than cynical manipulation. Jabotinsky's strategy means permanent war - just how sustainable do you think that might be? IMHO, it indicates mental-retardation of the entire Zionist group, plus most = at the very least 50%+1 of the diaspora. IF that diaspora did not accept the lies THEN they would get a bit vocal - one might think, since the obviously criminal 'Zionist project' reflects negatively on *all* Jews, *everywhere*.

[«back»]

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] Zionism  n. movement for the establishment and development of a Jewish nation in what was pre-UNGA181 Palestine.  Zionist n. & adj. [POD] [modified]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

[3] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [ibid.]

[4] crime  n. 1 a offence punishable by law. b illegal acts (resorted to crime). 2 evil act (crime against humanity). 3 colloq. shameful act. [Latin crimen] [ibid.]
criminal  -n. person guilty of a crime. [ibid.]

[5] accessory  n. (pl. -ies) 1 additional or extra thing. 2 (usu. in pl.) small attachment, fitting, or subsidiary item of dress (e.g. shoes, gloves). 3 (often foll. by to) person who abets or is privy to an (esp. illegal) act. [medieval Latin: related to *accede][ibid.]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

bipedal brutal pigs

Murdering thieves squatting on stolen land.

Jabotinsky, 1923: "the gloves have to be off" [= criminal violence.] "Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer" [= grave intellectual failure.]

What it means: Permanent war (at least until all mostly Palestinian, hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers, their heirs and successors are - 'neutralised,' usually by being killed.)

Ben-Gurion (1936-39): "... we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, ..."

Apart from the miserable few % of Palestine that the immigrating (often illegally = alien-invading) Jews managed to buy before the Arabs truly appreciated the danger, *all* the land occupied by Israel is improperly alienated = ethnically cleansed by genocidal methods = product of dispossession (recalls 3rd Reich Lebensraum), and as per the 'home-burglary' analogy, must be revested (UNGA194 = 'right of [refugee] return'), and the hapless victims adequately recompensed as part of illegal, Nuremberg-class war reparations, and the perpetrators + accessories appropriately punished.

-=*=-

PS The quotes in more extended form:

1. Herzl(1897): "Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor [Palestinians] must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."

2. Jabotinsky(~1923): "No native population would stomach the intrusion of another nation into their territory. So the gloves have to be off. Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer to Arab objections to Zionist control of the territory."

3. Ben-Gurion(1936-39): "“We must see the situation for what it is. ... But in the political field we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, ..."

Sooo; exactly who are the attackers, who are the defenders - in/around Israel = mostly stolen Palestine?

The status quo is a devastating indictment of 'world managers' = tyrants, proof by performance, proof by result.

The truly amazing thing is that the tyrants think they can get off scot-free?

perverse politicians criminal Jews/Zionists corrupt UN justice system

*No* decent person supports criminals.

IF decent people are in the majority (must be and a *huge* majority) THEN no representative should support criminals - yet they do so in droves, namely the foul Israeli Zionist regime. THIS means that our politicians are:

a) perverse, b) *non*-representative and c) such polluted democracies are *sham*.

Israel is about as criminal as it can get:

continuous ethnic-cleansing using genocidal methods,

squats on improperly alienated = stolen land/property,

attacks its dispossessed, blockaded victims; murdering people, smashing infrastructure = 3rd-Reich, Nuremberg-class crimes against humanity.

Why can / how does this happen?

a) The UK, US, SQSHsO etc. + UN enable/support the criminal, Zionist Israeli regime.

b) The people are *falsely* informed with hasbarah 'Jews as victims' lies.

It must be stopped absolutely soonest; prosecution of the perpetrators, justice + full reparations for the real, hapless victims = mainly Palestinian ELO/Os.

In addition, all *supporters* of the vicious Israeli crimes make themselves accessories, and they should also be prosecuted.

Only prosecution with appropriate punishment has a chance of stopping the current criminals, hopefully deterring any/all future repetition.

Note that collectively, if Jews were 50%+1 honest and democratic, they themselves would halt the criminal Zionist project, that they don't makes *all* Jews collectively responsible = prosecutable accessories, for the 64+ years of carnage, continuous ethnic-cleansing using genocide, in and around the illegitimate 'State' of Israel.

There can never be peace without justice!

-=*end*=-

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

are Hague and Netanyahu a) liars, or b) idiots, or c) criminals?

A: All three, and worse.

Refrain: stop the murdering; reverse the theft!

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Israel ready to 'significantly expand' Gaza operation
Philip Williams in Jerusalem, wires
Updated November 18, 2012 23:38:00
  «Israel has so far fired 950 rockets into Gaza in the last five days, and has called up 75,000 of its reservists for a possible ground strike.
"We are extracting a heavy price from Hamas and the terror organisations," Mr Netanyahu said at the start of a weekly cabinet meeting.» 
[AusBC against truth and justice]

Comment 1: Netanyahu's "extracting a heavy price" = 3rd Reich concept, "collective punishment."

Israel ready to 'significantly expand' Gaza operation ibid.
  «British foreign secretary William Hague has warned Israel that a ground invasion of the Gaza Strip would lose the nation much international sympathy and support.
Mr Hague told Sky News television it was much more difficult to limit civilian casualties in a ground assault and it would threaten to prolong the conflict.
Britain has said that Hamas bears the principal responsibility for the crisis due to perpetual rocket attacks on Israeli territory.» 
[AusBC for genocide-perpetrators]

Comment 1: Hague's "Hamas bears the principal responsibility" = 3rd Reich concept, "blaming the victim."

-=*=-

Fazit: These 'gentlemen' both ignore that Israel squats on improperly alienated = stolen land/property. By ignoring this incontrovertible fact, they lie by omission. Doing so, thinking they can get away with it, is incontrovertible proof that they are both idiots. That the whole, gruesome, 64+ year, un-remedied outrage turns on mass-murder for spoil, is a further, incontrovertible proof that they are criminals. The UN, ICJ etc. should immediately begin proceedings against these two, plus all others of their ilk. Soonest - or any delay, is yet another incontrovertible proof that the UN, ICJ etc. are corrupt. There is no alternative = TINA!