.. one really gets tired ...
.. of the really stupid lies ...
.. what's in it for the stupid liars?
Thesis/Subtitle: usually, it's not a good idea
Concomitant: to call people really stupid
Corollary: but IF true THEN not sorry
Actual theme: Syria, and the world, getting US/Z-F+UK'D.
[updated, 19:51, 30Aug, 31Aug.]
Preamble, found on the web:
CIA Internal Histories
Document 1 (Cover Sheet, Summary, I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D, Appendix E): CIA, Clandestine Services History, Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran: November 1952 – August 1953, Dr. Donald N. Wilber, March 1954
Source: The New York Times
I downloaded the Cover Sheet, Summary and Appendix A.
From the Cover Sheet:
This paper, entitled Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, ...
Project TPAJAX ...
The C.I.A.'s history of the 1953 coup in Iran is made up of the following documents: a historian's note, a summary introduction, a lengthy narrative account written by Dr. Donald N. Wilber, and, as appendices, five planning documents he attached. On April 16, 2000, The New York Times on the Web published the introduction and several of the appendices.
From the summary:
By the end of 1952, it had become clear that the Mossadeq government in Iran was incapable of reaching an oil settlement with interested Western countries;
was motivated mainly by Mossadeq's desire for personal power;
and had cooperated closely with the Tudeh (Communist) Party of Iran
and if that happened it would mean a victory for the Soviets in the Cold War and a major setback for the West in the Middle East. No remedial action other than the covert action plan ...
It was the aim of the TPAJAX project to cause the fall of the Mossadeq government ... and replace [it with one] ... which would reach an equitable oil settlement, ...
In Iran, CIA and SIS propaganda assets were to conduct an increasingly intensified propaganda effort ...
In cooperation with the Department of State, CIA had several articles planted in major American newspapers and magazines which, when reproduced in Iran, had the desired psychological effect in Iran and contributed to the war of nerves against Mossadeq.
From Appendix A:
1. Preliminary action
A. Interim Financing of Opposition
1. CIA will supply $35,000 to Zahedi.
2. SIS will supply $25,000 to Zahedi.
That was 1953; switching to 2013, and end preamble.
Trigger article 1:
Waging War in Syria ‘to Make a Point’?
John Glaser, August 26, 2013
«Aaron David Miller thinks the Obama administration will bomb Syria, aiming not to topple the Assad regime but to “make a point.”
“Obama has come around to the view that regime change is more fraught with dangers than letting Assad remain.”
The alternative is ugly. If the Obama administration tried to bomb the Assad regime out of existence, the U.S. would then have to militarily occupy Syria, ... That occupation would last for the foreseeable future, ...»
Comment: It's ridiculous to say that the US is not interested in deposing Assad - that was their loudly stated purpose; Mme Clinton; Assad "must go!" (About 236,000 results) Then the CIA helped arm the jihadis imported through TR and JOR, say. It's even more ridiculous to say that the US will attack Syria to slap Assad on the wrist?
Trigger article 2:
Bombing Syria ‘Just Enough Not to Get Mocked,’ Or, Where Does America Get Off?
John Glaser, August 28, 2013
«One U.S. official who has been briefed on the options on Syria said he believed the White House would seek a level of intensity “just muscular enough not to get mocked” but not so devastating that it would prompt a response from Syrian allies Iran and Russia.
“They are looking at what is just enough to mean something, just enough to be more than symbolic,” he said.
So not only are we bombing another country “to make a point,” but we’re doing it in a way that ensures we won’t “get mocked.”
Why should military action be necessitated by outrage over chemical attacks? Was there a red line on chemical weapons when the US used depleted-uranium ammunition in Fallujah, Iraq? Was there a red line when Israel deployed white phosphorous in Gaza in 2008? Or when Saddam Hussein, then a western ally, gassed the Iranians and then his own people during the 1980s? This arbitrary and self-serving declaration of what’s acceptable is precisely what makes the US so lacking in credibility when it comes to preaching codes of warfare to the Middle East.»
Comment: All this, and *zero* proof that any gas attack in Syria was by Assad's forces.
Trigger article 3:
Fort Hood shooter sentenced to death for 2009 killings
Posted August 29, 2013 05:57:57 | Updated August 29, 2013 13:15:35
«A US military jury has sentenced former army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan to death by lethal injection for killing 13 people in a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas.»
Comment: How does walking into some compound to kill innocents with hand-guns differ from US/Z-F+UK'D ships, planes and submarines firing bullets, bombs and rockets into a country to kill innocents remotely by robot? Especially given that there is *no* proof any gas attack in Syria was by Assad's forces, rather the 'alternative thesis,' that so-called 'rebels,' currently losing both battles and the whole fake civil war (which is actually more of an aggressive foreign invasion/fomented jihad), is much more likely?
Argument: First, it was Cheney/Rumsfeld: "Not oil!" Then the accessories, finally the apologists and mostly r-whinger-trolls: "Not oil!"
Me: Not credible. UK was interested in ME oil, latest when British warships started being changed from coal to oil, before WW1, see Churchill:
"During the war, he continued as First Lord of the Admiralty until the disastrous Gallipoli Campaign caused his departure from government."
Re Mesopotamia in 1920, Churchill:
"I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes."
According to wiki (which may be fiddled), the poms did not actually deploy poisoned gas in 1920, and/but there is no evidence to show that Assad's forces did in 2013 either.
That US and UK both want Iran's oil is proven by the preamble quotes. Note that while Syria is not a major oil-owner, it sits on a prime-pipeline route or two, namely an N/S one desired mainly by Qatar, and an E/W one already signed by Iran, Iraq and Syria. Hmmm.
F and D both abstained from the "Shock'n whore" of Iraq by B,B&H = US (the Z-wagged dog), UK (the poodle) + Aus (the dag), and afterwards (having missed out on spoil), F and D were sooo sorry, that Sarkozy practically jumped the gun getting into Libya, and Westerwelle (who sharply criticised Sarkozy in Mar'11) is now full-on screeching hate at Syria, D staying out of the 'firing line' only because it would probably cost the govt. any possible chance of re-election.
Fazit: We can assume that although the name of the game is no longer the same ('coup' morphed to 'Arab-spring,' say), the aim of the game remains exactly the same, namely US$s, hegemony and yes, still the bloody oil = murder for spoil, here oil, and land-theft, the latter by the Zs, from mainly Palestine and any other bits the Zs can improperly alienate by ever more genocidal ethnic cleansing, also murder for spoil, here soil. The Syrian bit that most interests the Zs here is the Z-occupied Golan Heights, both for land and water.
The big Q: How/why can these US/Z-F+UK'D rogue-regimes get away with Nuremberg-class = capital-crimes, the very same crimes for which others have been / will be executed?
And where, exactly, is truth + justice = peace?
^ Update, 19:51; PS The evening news shows both Obama and Cameron rowing backwards from an immediate intervention, and both UK-opposition and Merkel calling for 'wait and see' what the UN inspectors find - although it is *not* the inspectors' remit to investigate "Who?" So the final smashing of Syria seems postponed for now - but these psychopathic US/Z-F+UK'D criminals simply cannot keep their hands in their pockets for too long.
And don't forget the Pentagon's 'take-out' (=smash) wish-list of 7 countries in 5 years (leaked ~10 days after 9/11), and the (US/Z's) road to Tehran goes through Damascus.
^ Update, 30Aug; PPS Extraordinary ...
"something is happening here
but you don't know what it is"
From my unfavourite PFBC:
1. British government says it has legal authority to attack Syria without UN ruling
2. British MPs vote against military intervention in Syria
3. Claims Australian troops cut off insurgent's hands('elite special forces')
4. CIA's budget worth $15 billion according to documents leaked by Edward Snowden
1. No; nobody can (with impunity) contravene 'the law,' here the UN Charter. The attempt is to 'write' new law, not by the accepted (democratic?) processes, but by force majeure based on 'supposed' R2P. IMHO not on, and recall that there is no evidence of 'who dunnit.'
2. This surprises me; why did some in Cameron's party rebel? The surprise is more general, now all 4 of US-F+UK'D are 'rowing back.' So Q: What went wrong? A: They're not saying = it's a 'secret?'
3. Proves the military has *some* psychopaths; I'd say *most* are - in order to kill people, perpetrators must be 'not normal' = sub-human.
4. CIA = $15bio + NSA = 10bio. All for 'covert ops' from spying (also on us, we the people) to murdering - mostly innocents (lethal drones, say) plus bribery, sabotage etc. - mostly illegal things, mostly attemptedly hidden by lies. Perpetrators have to lie, else they would self-convict.
Comment: "Secrecy is a mortal enemy of democracy!"
Further comment: The 'oil deal' Mossadeq was rejecting was probably similar to the one I found when researching this article, namely only 16% going to Iran. Amazingly similar to Aus 'losing' ~83% to FDI. Hmmm?
Just in (NYT): "Obama Set for Limited Strike on Syria as British Vote No"
Me: Vicious, criminal rogue-regime; let the tumbrels roll!
^ Update, 31Aug; PPPS A John Kerry 'Colin Powell' moment:
1. AusBC: "US says world cannot let Assad get away with chemical attack"
2. US govt.: "Assessment of the Syrian Government’s Use of Chemical Weapons"
3. Sample false-flag: "Obama administration complicit in war crime?"
Comment: IMHO, Kerry dissembled (the US has 'loose with the truth' form). IMHO, their 'evidence' is unconvincing (proof = UK parliament rejected it). IMHO, something like (3) is more than possible, it's most probable. The people may decide ("Polls show the American public is largely opposed"), but sadly (sham democracies) we, the people have *no* influence.
 deceive v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit. deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief. deceiver n. [POD]
 lie2 -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive. give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]
 conspiracy n. (pl. -ies) 1 secret plan to commit a crime; plot. 2 conspiring. [Latin: related to *conspire] [ibid.]
ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers
I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology
M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'
neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+
PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC
ppp-dd'd = pushed-propaganda paradigm dumbed-down
PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'
SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on
the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité
US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood
US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable
XS-CO2-C*4 = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe cliff
(suspected only one-way = spiral-down)
Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = perpetual aggressive war