What is happening in Syria, is a slow-motion, illegal, part-alien invasion, part-internal armed & murdering subversion, which is destroying the fabric of the country, as 1000s of innocent citizens are being killed, mostly by the attackers with some as 'collaterals' to legitimate govt. defensive operations. That the Syrian govt. resists this outrage is *correct*, as one of the prime tasks of govt.. That the US is involved, as 'accelerant' and supporter from before the start, is continuing its involvement - *proven* by Kerry’s boast, to ‘double aid’ to the ‘rebels’ - is not at all in doubt, but is touted by US-MSM plus sycophants. They admit that the CIA is supervising the import of arms and mercenaries through Turkey. Perhaps worse, the UN is involved - but *not* to stop the carnage; not effectively stopping the ‘rebel’ attacks means actually encouraging murder and the eventual US-planned rapine.
It’s not new; see Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, ... Vietnam, N.Korea, Palestine - the latter on-going, thanks, but “No, thanks!” to *all* Jews (except genuine resisters = totally ineffective), and all world regimes not screaming for a stop to Zionists’ ethnic cleansing of pre-UNGA181 Palestine by murdering, thieving, *genocidal* methods.
Obviously, in this current worst of all worlds, there can be no security - in Syria, and in your own neighbourhood soon enough - when the supposed ‘peace-police’ are corrupt.
WHERE IS JUSTICE??!
2013-04-27
OUTRAGE!
2013-04-26
the WH believes
based on nothing
and I have a dream
.. Houston, we have a problem ...
.. perhaps a slight misquote ...
.. but no way exaggerated
-=*=-
Thesis/Subtitle: fiddling while Rome burns
Concomitant: killing while Earth sizzles
Corollary: all tyrants are such idiots
-=*=-
Trigger article:
April 25, 2013
White House Says It Believes Syria Has Used Chemical Arms
By MARK LANDLER and ERIC SCHMITT
«WASHINGTON — The White House said Thursday that it believes the Syrian government has used chemical weapons in its civil war, an assessment that could test President Obama’s repeated warnings that such an attack could precipitate American intervention in Syria.
... the nation’s intelligence agencies assessed “with varying degrees of confidence” that ...»
[nytimes/'news']
Comment 1: Note that 'belief' may be done on little or *no* information; see lemma {2}.
Comment 2: Note that "varying degrees of confidence" = no agreement ($US60bio+ p/a) = someone - here some 'intel' or input - is lying, 'normal' suspect = Zs.
Comment 3: Note that such articles from the NYT are mainly (lying) propaganda anyway; no real need to read any more of it.
Contra-article 1:
The Convoluted Path to ‘Chemical Weapons’ Belief
Jason Ditz, April 25, 2013
«Later Tuesday: Secretary of State John Kerry calls Benjamin Netanyahu to specifically press him on Brun’s claim. Kerry says Netanyahu was unable to confirm the allegation at all, while Netanyahu’s office refuses to make any public comments on the call or Brun’s claim. Kerry follows up with this non-proof by pushing NATO to send more aid to Syria’s rebels.
Wednesday: Hagel points out how weird it is that no one in Israel told him any of this stuff during his visit, in which he (civilian leader of the US military) met with Israeli military officials.
Thursday: The White House says it believes Syria has used chemical weapons on a “small scale.” Hagel says he believes that too.»
[antiwar/Ditz]
Comment 1: Note: "Kerry follows up with this non-proof by pushing NATO to send more aid to Syria’s rebels." More on this below.
Comment 2: Note: "Hagel says he believes that too," then review 'belief based on zero info,' see lemma {2}.
Contra-article 2:
Why Obama’s Chemical Weapons ‘Red Line’ in Syria Is Bogus
John Glaser, April 25, 2013
«Last year, President Obama outlined what would be a “red line” for his administration, beyond which arguments against going to war in Syria would lose their weight. In August 2012 he said, “A red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.”»
[antiwar/Glaser]
Comment: Almost all Obama&Co (i.e. each US president, the State Dept, the CIA et al. and especially the Pentagon) seem to do, is to consider where next to attack some (non-cooperative) resource-owner. Then having decided, they try to 'convince' the electorate - in itself peculiar, since the electorate is effectively neutered - see lemma {1}.
-=*=-
Argument: I dimly recall the 'ascendency' of the current al-Assad, Bashar, following the death of his father Hafez. There was some concern about the older brother Bassel taking over, and some relief when the older died and the succession passed to the younger. Bashar al-Assad was a bit 'Westernised' and tried some neoliberal 'reforms,' but at a rough guess Syria was considered insufficiently (US-)compliant, AND/OR the only 'road to Tehran' the US/Zs wish to use 'runs through Damascus.' (About 12,100,000 results). At any rate, Wesley Clark (7 countries in 5 years; About 1,630,000 results) accurately foretold the US-attack on Syria now underway. Recently, Kerry promised to 'double aid to Syrian rebels,' thus *proving* what is an 'open secret,' namely that the US is up to its (murdering to steal) bottom-lip in subverting Syria. None of the above should be unknown to current affairs aficionados, let alone at all controversial.
Then kindly consider these two quotes: "where the oil resources constitute a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history", *PLUS* "... But in the political field we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, ..." might give a glimpse of a few horrible truths.
The quote-sources may be found by some judicious google-searches, but again should not be at all controversial. The hideous truth of the matter is that there are two evil rogue-regimes active, 'merrily' murdering to steal, practically at will.
-=*=-
Fazit: Long story short; in many jurisdictions, it is an offence to ignore a serious accident, and an even worse offence to ignore a crime in progress. So where are the truth&justice seekers, and why are they not taking effective steps to halt then correct the horrendous depredations of the horridly criminal Z and US regimes?
My dream? - That the wait for effective help will not be long.
-=*end*=-
Ref(s):
[1] deceive v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit. deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief. deceiver n. [POD]
[2] lie2 -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive. give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]
[3] belief n. 1 firm opinion; acceptance (that is my belief). 2 religious conviction (belief in the afterlife; has no belief). 3 (usu. foll. by in) trust or confidence. [related to *believe] [ibid.]
-=*=-
Lemmas:
{1} Our ('Western') democracies are 'sham' = tyrannies.
A properly-functioning democracy has at least three preconditions; a fully&fairly informed electorate, a wide choice of *bona fide* candidates who, upon election, faithfully and effectively work *for* we, the people's best interests. Aus, as many 'Western' so-called democracies, arguably fails all three preconditions.
Proofs: A proof of being *mis*-informed = the Iraq imbroglio; 'they' (B, B & H, say) *knowingly* lied to us, proof = all 'intel-sources' were bogus, identified as such beforehand, and not even *one* miserable, little WMD was ever found – and they looked, and looked ...
A *dis*-proof of 'wide choice' is the deliberate 'false dichotomy' of a notionally 'two-party' system, and associated 'platforms' - incapable of offering any sane grouping of life-choices.
A proof of being *mis*-represented = when reps sell-out to the 'big end of town' (newly '<1%,' thnx OWS), they clearly are *not* representing us, we the people. More; bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic (implementation of neoliberalism, say - or war) - since bipartisan offers the voters *zero* choice. Neoliberalism is (always was) *not* in we the people's interest; proof = continuing wealth-transfer from the 99%+ to the <1%. Additional proof of neoliberalism = bad for the 99%+ is the climbing prices of privatised services (toll-boothing) and the falling household = labour share of income (globalisation; wage/job arbitration), aka spiral-down for the 99%+.
IF sham-democracy can be proven (which I claim QED) THEN all laws that result are invalid = (should be) inoperative.
IF it's not "of, by, for (us, we the people)" THEN it's not "as advertised" = defective product; AND "no taxation without (non-fake) representation" THEN refund our mis-directed $s – plus %, don't need "Please."
{2} There is no (can be no - perceivable) g*d.
Proof: Any (putative) god [n. 1 a (in many religions) superhuman being [POD]] is defined as *outside* our (= 'the') universe (as some claimed 'creator,' say). Everything *inside* the universe is based on matter or energy - which Einstein showed are interchangeable (e = mc**2). By the conservation 'laws' (no known exception, none expected), matter/energy may neither be created nor destroyed. Since information is 'mediated' by matter/energy, no 'external' info may reach into the universe, so any 'entity' outside the universe is ‘blatantly,’ ‘obviously’ & ‘utterly’ unreachable to any inside, and vice-versa. QED
Note: This may not exhaustively preclude the existence of any supernatural anythings, just that we may never know of/communicate with any such – nor could such affect any thing/person. IF there can be no communication, neither to nor from, THEN what's to discuss? One could appeal to 'common sense,' but it's seemingly quite rare. Consider Occam's razor; what could any g*d offer? IF the conservation laws are correct (which I claim) THEN no creator required, just some 'phase-change.' Add 2nd thermo-law (entropy tends to increase), then no Qs outstanding.
What monkey can't see, monkey can't do; any 'belief' (here in some g*d = supernatural) is done based on *no* information - by definition.
-=*=-
A PS on belief:
Try this google: quote tony blair "I passionately believe"
About 1,510,000 results
Tells us almost all we need to know really; the 'icing on the cake' being Blair's 'self-conversion' to Roman Catholicism after the illegal "Shock'n whore" attack = smashing of Iraq = *millions* dead who otherwise would be alive, *more* millions both internally displaced and outright fled, infrastructure destroyed = life in Iraq back to 'the stone age.' Thanks, but "No, thanks!" to Blair as part of the B, B & H mass-murdering to steal trio + others in the 'coalition of the killing.'
The only important operable belief 'our tyrants' have, is that they can get away with their wicked crimes; Q: Why does the world let 'em?
-=*=-
Abbreviations:
ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers
I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology
M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'
neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+
PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC
ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down
PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'
SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on
the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité
US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood
US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable
XS-CO2-C*4 = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe (one-way) cliff
Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent aggressive war
2013-04-03
breathless hypocrisy
deliberately to deceive
by people who know better
.. lies not ...
.. for the better ...
.. but for much worse
-=*=-
Trigger article:
UN approves first ever global arms trade treaty
By Brendan Trembath, wires
Posted April 03, 2013 08:51:44
«"The agreement of the arms trade treaty sends a clear message to arms dealers who supply warlords and dictators that their time is up," said Anna Macdonald of the global development group Oxfam.
"They will no longer be able to operate and arm themselves with impunity. The world will be watching and will hold them accountable."
Amnesty International's Frank Jannuzi said the NRA, which claimed credit last year for persuading the United States to block the treaty in July 2012, had failed this time.»
[ausBC/'news']
20 years, they say, wrangling about this - and suddenly a breakthrough, simultaneously isolating three of US' 'prime' targets - such an unexpected coincidence! And NGOs preening, "Look what we can do!"
Liars all.
This is nothing but breathless hypocrisy; the text was obviously constructed such that Syria, Iran and N.Korea were made to feel that they had no other option but to vote against it, and Russia (amongst others) abstained. Funny, that Syria, Iran and N.Korea are US-declared 'enemies,' N.Korea having already long ago been smashed:
“After destroying North Korea’s 78 cities and thousands of her villages, and killing countless numbers of her civilians, [General] LeMay remarked, “Over a period of three years or so we killed off – what – twenty percent of the population.” It is now believed that the population north of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a third its population of 8 – 9 million people during the 37-month long “hot” war, 1950 – 1953, perhaps an unprecedented percentage of mortality suffered by one nation due to the belligerance [sic] of another.” (quoted in Richard Rhodes, “The General and World War III,” The New Yorker, June 19, 1995, p. 53.)
N.Korea is still under US-pressure; some say their latest threats are actually a call for direct negotiations - to get that pressure *off* them.
Iran suffered a violent, anti-democratic US/UK coup in 1953, since the Iranians took their country back in 1979, the US has mercilessly pursued them. The US(NATO) plus Arab League is now sponsoring alien invaders to infiltrate and attack Syria, and not so long ago F+UK/NATO smashed Libya. Some NGOs 'help' in these smashings; unless so-called responsible entities actively oppose crimes-in-progress, they make themselves accessories.
Vis-à-vis Iraq, the UN did nothing +ve, the then UN-Sec-Gen admitted that the US/UK/Aus attack was illegal - and yet now, the UN and various NGOs are celebrating a treaty which may, one day, do something against the dirty, *murdering* arms business, which the US leads, and Germany, say, supplies nuclear-capable submarines to Israel - the same Israel that has stolen most of pre-UNGA181 Palestine = ethnic cleansing by genocidal methods, seemingly UN-approved - or at least, *proven* by the bloody, 65+ year long status quo, UN-tolerated.
The situation is much worse than this 'quickie' describes; we are being 'smothered' in vast lie-clouds, while the <1% consolidates its control over the world, syphoning ever more of our, we (= 99%+) the people's $s into their already obscenely rich pockets, and allowing the ruining of our once jewel-like planet's comfortable life-supporting ecosphere.
-=*end*=-
Ref(s):
[1] deceive v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit. deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief. deceiver n. [POD]
[2] lie2 -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive. give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]
Abbreviations:
ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers
I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology
M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'
neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+
PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC
ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down
PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'
SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on
the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité
US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood
US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable
XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe
Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent aggressive war
2013-03-13
new pope -
same old sins
He has about 24 hrs to say "NO MORE WAR - US&Co, get your fingers - and bombers - out of Syria. Stop the killing, call off the mercenaries, stop the arms inflowing."
IF the new pope does *not* soon say something like the above, THEN he will prove - again, about 266 times now, that the catholic church is an accessory to mass-murdering for spoil - since that's what the US (& Zs, F+UK and such *rogue regimes*) do - and it must be stopped.
Go on, new pope, I dare you - to stand up for truth + justice = peace.
-=*=-
[update, 20Mar'13]
update, 15Mar'13, 16:51
Usually, it doesn't matter who says what, but what is said. Here, it's a bit different; IF the pope said "NO MORE WAR!" THEN people would listen. I say, IF not (now/ever) THEN why not?
Francis I, speak now, or forever hold your peace - as in peace now, OR peace-off!
-=*=-
update, 15Mar'13, 10:29
Well, my notional 24 hrs of 'grace' have come and gone; as I expected, no "NO MORE WAR!" from Pope Francis I.
It's *proof* of corruption (of the Catholic Church, but consistent with other x-tian churches = all similarly corrupt, as proven by the same *inaction* on wars), and exactly why I put '†' into the M/I/C/$4a†-plex = the tyrannical malefactors ruling most of our once jewel-like planet.
-=*=-
Trigger article 1:
Francis uses first mass to urge spiritual renewal for church
By Europe correspondent Mary Gearin, wires
Updated March 15, 2013 07:58:05
«Newly elected Pope Francis has warned the Catholic Church could be in danger of becoming a compassionate non-government organisation without spiritual foundations if it fails to undergo renewal.
...
Pope Francis replaces Benedict XVI, whose papacy was plagued by a series of public relations blunders.
He angered the Muslim world with a speech in 2006, in which he appeared to endorse the view that Islam is inherently violent.
...
He is not afraid to challenge governments and other powerful interests.
Francis, the name the new Pope has chosen, is believed to represent poverty and humility.»
[AusBC/Mary Gearin, wires]
Comment 1, "compassionate non-government organisation without spiritual foundations:" - that's the correct comparison; NGOs like AI & HRW are not merely doing nothing effective, they're doing as good as nothing at all for truth + justice = peace.
Comment 2, "the view that Islam is inherently violent:" - there are at least two things about Islam and inherently violent, a) yes, proved by their recent (Herzl++, say) actions, they are a disorganised rabble, fighting within themselves, but b) the dissension is most likely to be deliberately revved-up from outside (mainly US-destabilising = divide&rule), primarily due to the alien invaders who thrust themselves into the ME-midst = the aggressive Zs.
Comment 2, "He is not afraid to challenge governments and other powerful interests:" empty words; proof needed, proof that will (IMO most likely) never come.
Comment 4, "Francis, ... is believed to represent poverty and humility:" again self-serving bullshit; as well as condemning war, any spiritual (ethical) so-called 'leader' who does *not* condemn neoliberalism&ilk further enriching the obscenely rich <1% (at the expense of the 99%+, especially with the vicious reductions in 'welfare') *proves* his/her corruption - as we'll be seeing with all the 'missing' condemnation(s).
-=*=-
Trigger article 2:
God Angrily Clarifies 'Don't Kill' Rule
News • God • ISSUE 37•34 • Sep 26, 2001
«Growing increasingly wrathful, God continued: "Can't you people see? What are you, morons? There are a ton of different religious traditions out there, and different cultures worship Me in different ways. But the basic message is always the same: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Shintoism... every religious belief system under the sun, they all say you're supposed to love your neighbors, folks! It's not that hard a concept to grasp."
"Why would you think I'd want anything else? Humans don't need religion or God as an excuse to kill each other - you've been doing that without any help from Me since you were freaking apes!" God said. "The whole point of believing in God is to have a higher standard of behavior. How obvious can you get?"
"I'm talking to all of you, here!" continued God, His voice rising to a shout. "Do you hear Me? I don't want you to kill anybody. I'm against it, across the board. How many times do I have to say it? Don't kill each other anymore - ever!»
[theonion/God]
Comment 1, warning: There may be inappropriate ads on the cited page.
Comment 2: The fact that this pope and (AFAIK) all others, do not condemn war-making in any effective way, as before, proves their utter corruption. Proof of preceding statement: There is always *one* (or more) aggressors; the aggressor is always in the wrong (see Zs into Palestine, say) and an effective papal action - like unequivocal condemnation, with excommunication as consequence would a) show acceptable bona fides, and b) possibly halt all aggression. As it is, silence is also a form of consent; consent = assistance & any assistance draws guilt by the accessory mechanism.
-=*=-
Trigger article 3:
Thou shalt not kill
«You shall not murder sometimes translated as You shall not kill, KJV Thou shalt not kill (LXX ?? f??e?se??, translating Hebrew ??? ???????? lo tir?a?), is a moral imperative included as one of the Ten Commandments in the Torah,[1] specifically Exodus 20:13 and Deuteronomy 5:17.
The imperative is against unlawful killing resulting in bloodguilt. The Hebrew Bible contains numerous prohibitions against unlawful killing, but also allows for justified killing in the context of warfare, capital punishment, and self-defense.»
[wiki/Torah(bible?)]
Comment 1: Already in here, the weasel-words "allows for justified killing in the context of warfare ..." In case it's not obvious (recall my above "There is always *one* (or more) aggressors;") IF one stops the aggressor THEN there's no war even possible - one, perhaps *the major function* of the UN. But the UN proves its own corruption, latest with UNGA181, 29Nov'47.
Comment 2: This wiki shows us exactly how wiki is corrupt and corrupted; see the attempted insertion of "The Hebrew Bible contains numerous prohibitions against unlawful killing of Hasidic Jews, but also allows for justified or unjustified killing of all others in the context of warfare, ..." - you may fill in your own dots; as at any crime-scene we ask cui bono, and the answer here is the I/J/Z-plex as mass-murderers for spoil = soil, legitimate owners thereof = the improperly dispossessed (i.e. by violent = murdering theft), hapless ELO/Os of pre-Zionist-invasion Palestine.
Allowing partisan editors - which wiki does, I've run afoul of exactly that myself, namely a Jewish editor on a Palestine-related issue, is *begging* for trouble. Jews are reputed to deliberately lie, if they are convinced such lying could aid their objectives, here and as usual, the illegitimate entity which is Israel.
-=*=-
Argument: The Catholic Church calls itself 'exceptional' by claiming (as do all other such religions), a 'direct line' to some g*d. The fact that according to mankind's best science (i.e. the conservation laws), IF there were to be some g*d (n. 1 a (in many religions) superhuman being or spirit worshipped as having power over nature, human fortunes, etc. [POD]), THEN no message whatsoever could ever reach us. This in turn means one of two things; a) such putative g*ds violate physics OR b) there is no such thing. Given that belief is done on little or *no* evidence, one can see the fragile state of any 'believers,' here the #1 believer = the pope. As for the pope, so for his flock.
The US calls itself 'exceptional' by claiming to be 'leader of the free world' and 'the world's policeman,' among other foolishness. The incontestable fact is before all else, the US is the world's worst rogue regime, murdering for spoil looong *before* as well as after WW2.
The I/J/Z-plex calls itself 'exceptional' by claiming to be 'the only democracy in the ME' and 'G*d gave it to us!' In actual fact, Israel competes for world's worst rogue regime; the Zs having invaded (also by stealth) and stolen almost the entire pre-UNGA181 Palestine, and that by genocidal ethnic cleansing. Adding insult to injury, the I/J/Z-plex lies continually - as does the US-regime. Since lies are deployed to deceive, this is the *proof* of their vicious perfidy. (As if critical observation (through the MSM + PFBC obscuration and often *active* assistance) was not already more than enough.)
The UN thinks itself 'exceptional' by claiming to have as function war-prevention – but it shows its despicable corruption by assisting war, see from Palestine through to Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, next Iran.
-=*=-
Fazit: Aggressive war is a crime, and aggressors must be brought to justice. Pfui; not the US, not Zs, not F+UK (regimes; all actual perpetrators = war criminals), not the UN (the nominal policeman), and here - not the Catholic Church (a so-called 'ethics leader'), do anything effective to stop war. A witness to a crime who makes no attempt to stop the crime makes him-/her-/it-self also a criminal (accessory). C'mon, Francis I; show us I'm wrong - at least about you.
-=*end*=-
^
Update, 20Mar'13; PS Again, nothing happened = again, no "NO MORE WAR!" from Pope Francis I.
So here's an article:
Pope Francis, CIA and ‘Death Squads’
By Robert Parry
March 18, 2013
«In other words, yes, the U.S. government was covertly organizing and funding the activities of the supposedly “independent” internal opposition in Nicaragua. And, according to more than a dozen sources that I interviewed inside the Contra movement or close to U.S. intelligence, the Reagan administration had funneled CIA money to virtually every segment of the internal opposition, from the Catholic Church to La Prensa to business and labor groups to political parties.
“We’ve always had the internal opposition on the CIA payroll,” one U.S. government official said. The CIA’s budget line for Nicaraguan political action - separate from Contra military operations - was about $10 million a year, my sources said. I learned that the CIA had been using the Church and Cardinal Miguel Obando y Bravo to funnel money into Nicaragua.»
[globalresearch/Parry]
Comment: Just a sample, read it yourself - or not; I can't care more than bringing such to your attention, dear reader. Regardless, wishing you (unknown) well.
[«back»]
-=*=-
Ref(s):
[1] deceive v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit. deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief. deceiver n. [POD]
[2] lie2 -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive. give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]
Abbreviations:
ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers
I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology
M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'
neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+
PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC
ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down
PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'
SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on
the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité
US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood
US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable
XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe
Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent aggressive war
2013-03-04
life = entropy
food; what goes in
less a bit consumed
equals what goes out
We should all know this, but some bits seem to be unknown to, or forgotten by some people: Consider a 'primitive' hunter-gatherer family; some members (usually not all) go out to find food (animal or vegetable, say). The 'bounty of nature' is returned to the family (camp, cave, hut etc.), and then everybody eats it, possibly after cooking. Hunting, gathering (primary employment) and cooking (service industry) are termed 'work' and not everyone (children, retirees) has to work but all get fed; it's called sharing. Any food not required by the active workers is called an 'economic surplus,' any left after all eat can be stored for the future (= 'saving'). If not enough food is found, every one 'diets,' if none is found for long enough (and the cupboard is bare), they all starve. There's a bit more called 'waste disposal;' edible bits can go to the dogs else the rubbish-heap, then there's the tor-lets. Another required input is water (Aus-speak: wardah); it is *not* good for the rubbish-heap or the tor-lets to pollute the wardah.
Generally, all life follows this pattern:
life = entropy;
food; what goes in
less a bit consumed
equals what goes out
Entropy means *dis*order, and always increases; here are two examples from 'real' life:
1. Sunshine falls on the ground, where grass grows by converting sunlight + CO2 into roots, shoots and leaves. Cows (or geese) graze on the green grass, hunter-gatherers may then gather milk, eggs or meat - or if the 'grass' is in fact lettuce, a salad = a nicely balanced diet (markedly different from the approaching starvation diet that Israel inflicts on Gaza, say.)
2. Sunshine falls on the wardah, where plankton grows by converting sunlight + CO2 into fish-food, the fish in turn may be caught by local hunter-gatherers (except where prevented, like the Gazans by Israel, say.)
In both cases (not the 3rd = starvation), sunlight is turned into food lower down in a food-chain, and the 'top' predator extracts energy from the food, the residue ending up as waste - a disordered state quite different to that seen on the supermarket shelves, say.
There is a form of 'life' differing from the above examples; I refer to capitalist accumulation. Ever-more of the economic surplus produced by workers is 'harvested' by the <1%, a) 1st by forcing productivity up ("Work longer for less or get fired!") = lowering 'wage/work' density, b) 2ndly by off-shoring jobs = unemployment, reducing income possibly to zero, and c) by "buying low and selling high" = ripping-off 'what the market will bear,' vs. 'cost plus a fair mark-up.' Any profit ripped-off over cost plus a fair mark-up is called super-profit, or economic rent (see Aus mining, say). Hence Keynes' insistence on “the euthanasia of the rentier.” (Also explains why Keynes has fallen out of fashion in <1% circles.)
The preceding para. talked of ripping off workers, by 'classic' capitalist processes plus neoliberalism (aka economic rationalism) and globalisation. It is extremist; every resource is to be exhaustively exploited; i.e. forests razed, oceans emptied, workers reduced to starvation wages. No proof is offered here, except to say "Open your eyes, look around."
At least two other forms of rip-offs are under way; the criminal bankster-swindle of $-creation, loaned out @ %, and 'financialisation' whereby service-providers are turned into toll-booth operations; privatisation (= theft) of public utilities or infrastructure and subsequent profit extraction, often after loading up enterprises with loans = more rip-offs to banksters (plus their blood-sucking shareholders, almost all in the <1%.)
A further way capitalist accumulation differs from 'normal life' is that the accumulation tends to get frozen; they can never *spend* all their mostly ill-gotten gains, but either park it at %, or gamble it away on stock exchanges and 'investment' banks when not outright casinos (all mostly also zero-sum; the $s go from one fat-cat to the next). Thus a vast proportion of the accumulation does not circulate; the 'circle of $ life' starts to contract - just like the IMF-SAPed victim countries' economies do - see PIIGS, again.
Now, to the point: We the people are being put through the above processes, and the results are ugly, and getting ever uglier. See the US, with ~50mio people on food-stamps, the last 'social' step before starvation. Health costs going through the roof; often to get sick is to bankrupt the family - then die anyway. Unemployment never comes down, except possibly by fiddling the figures. (See NYT today: "Recovery in U.S. Lifting Profits, Not Adding Jobs" - me: That's no recovery.) Look at the PIIGS Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece & Spain. Try this: "The Greek Catastrophe: “Economic Progress” Built on Rotten Political Foundations."
Our so-called 'leaders' (democratic; "of, by, for the people etc.") are not just not protecting us, they are *actively implementing* the <1%'s neoliberal = erring ideology policies which work mainly *against* us, we the people.
Never forget, here, the disastrous effects of the MSM + PFBCs, who transmit and *actively assist* the lying propaganda.
One of the biggest problems are actually three: a) The people have been ppp-dd'd (mainly via TV), and b) there is little debate and *no* effective countervailing power. Q: Where are the intellectuals? A: Sold out, apparently. Finally c), the depredations of the <1% directed at us, we the people, are cutting our collective incomes (spiral down); we're being put on a 'diet' - much like the Gazans.
The <1% have clearly gone mad, see my "4X4 musing" summary and "If It Wasn't For Bad Luck " for some detail.
The <1%, mad = lying, cheating, murdering to steal psychopaths, are not 'just' uselessly accumulating, they are attacking the basis of life itself. Their constriction of the 99% is cutting our inputs, we the people seem headed for starvation and eventual death. Nice types.
Fazit/last word: The actions of the <1% are a) clearly unsustainable and b) heading the world down the tubes = into the tor-let, with their rip-offs, wars and accompanying excess CO2 - who will stop these monsters?
-=*end*=-
Ref(s):
[1] deceive v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit. deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief. deceiver n. [POD]
[2] lie2 -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive. give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]
Abbreviations:
ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers
I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology
M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'
neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+
PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC
ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down
PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'
SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on
the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité
US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood
US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable
XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe
Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent aggressive war
2013-03-02
If It Wasn't For Bad Luck
we wouldn't have no luck at all
If It Wasn't For Bad morals
they wouldn't have morals at all
If It Wasn't For Bad propaganda
we wouldn't have news at all
If It Wasn't For Bad politicians
we wouldn't have trouble at all
•
Of course, it's not only politicians.
Consider the M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM + PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM + PFBCs = mainstream media + publicly financed broadcasters, like the AusBC.
No Church is properly 'pro-active;' along with all other killing, they should forbid military killing, (except in true self-defence = *not* Vietnam through Iraq to Syria, on to Iran etc.), and should excommunicate all who violate the do-not-kill commandment.
Add the I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian erstwhile legal owner/occupiers = ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied "supreme international" crime-scene and *all* in the I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty (some more = actual perpetrators, some less = accessories & apologists - even silence = complicity).
The above extends Eisenhower's MI-complex and describes the two worst rogue regimes = US & Zs; it encompasses the full 'leadership' of many countries and the world; where regimes cooperate with the two rogue regimes they make themselves SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on.
Democracy is disabled by 1) a two-party lock; bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic, 2) deceived voters may not make fully informed voting choices, and 3) after being elected, representatives sell-out to $s and lobbies, including 5th columns. These disabled democracies have become tyrannies.
No dissent is tolerated from the tyrants' dictates, this fully explains the aggressive wars, with the benefit of seizing resources to 'harvest' the economic rent, plus denying competitors.
To 'stray' from the truth is to lie, to murder for spoil is psychopathic. The 'bad morality' the perpetrators embrace is that the self-designated 'strong' = most of the current <1%, *must* rip-off and kill all they can, since to *allow* themselves to be ripped-off and killed, means that the hapless victims are weak when compared to the psychopaths.
The proof is all around us; from Thatcher's TINA and Reagan's voodoo economics, neoliberalism and globalisation are strangling the '1st world' as the banksters suck it dry with their vile $-creation, loaned at %, latest manifestation = the so-called 'forced' descent into austerity. Anything for profit prioritises profit over performance; vis-à-vis for profit medicine can be and in growing cases is fatal.
Last words: There's nothing élite about criminals, there can never be peace without justice.
2013-02-23
we live in a tyranny
comment as submitted
to antiwar.com - and published
Belief is *dangerous*; inspect the definition:
belief n. 1 firm opinion; acceptance (that is my belief). 2 religious conviction (belief in the afterlife; has no belief). 3 (usu. foll. by in) trust or confidence. [POD]
-=*=-
[updated, 17:01 and 18:49]
-=*=-
Proof: Belief can occur based on *zero* evidence, as in 'religious conviction' - and look at the troubles religions cause! Also here, 99% believe that "Iran’s nuclear program as a threat to the US national security," although, as Ditz, Glaser et al., including America’s 16 intelligence agencies swear there is *no* Iranian nukular bomb program.
In the wider scheme of things, the US public (as others in quisling 'allied' countries) is continually bombarded = propagandised with themes like exceptionalism, world-leadership, donates democracy via guns&bombs = destruction to those deprived by dictators, is a shining example, can do no wrong, etc. - in the face of facts that prove otherwise = often even the exact opposite.
It is not as if the people are stupid. Proof: Only 50% are, by definition, and some very smart people seem to 'believe' in patently false ideas, like neoliberalism = voodoo economics. Proof of the latter is almost everywhere neoliberalism has been implemented - and is demonstrably failing (unemployment, privatisation = theft from public then toll-boothing, austerity = service-cuts, bank 'rescues' (further!) enriching the <1%, etc.).
The operative phrase vis-à-vis Iran's (non-)nuke goes something like this: "The West suspects Iran of building a bomb," and such is repeated ad nauseam by the MSM *and* PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC. That PFBCs are 'on board' is proof a) of their own corruption and b) that there *is* a conspiracy, since PFBCs must operate with their government's approval.
Note that "Iran building a bomb" is a lie (to the very best of our combined knowledge, and US-intel should know since it's their actual, ~$60bio+ function), so 99% of the electorate are being deceived, and that's only one topic of about a squillion critical ones.
I think that it's not so much "belief," nor as Chomsky once wrote, "manufactured consent" - but more *resigned acceptance*; the people internalise their impotence to influence the so-called 'leadership' (see last para), plus the fact that they get their info from 'people who *should* know' = speakers on MSM + public radio and TV (authority fallacy); they also know that IF the US (or Zs) want a war THEN they'll have one, come hell or high water, so the people just nod to the pollsters, then get back to their Hollywood-TV, beer and home-delivered pizza.
A democracy cannot function on a deceived electorate = one of three proofs of Western democracies = sham, the other two being bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic and elected representatives betraying us, one proof of the latter being the Iraq war = Nuremberg-class invasion (plus Libya, Syria and soon Iran), and another being the imposition of voodoo economics = neoliberalism, without us (we, the people) being offered any choice = "TINA!"
A non-functioning democracy = in this case a tyranny; here we are.
-=*end*=-
^
Update, 17:01; PS - I submitted a follow-on comment - which was immediately flagged: "Your comment is awaiting moderation."
This means that moderation is triggered by content; you try to guess which bits are the trigger:
@PEACE EVER AFTER: “Those polls were fixed.”
Perhaps you’re correct; the original Ditz-report cited a timesofisrael source. One major point of hasbara is to attempt a disguise of the murdering-force theft of almost all of pre-UNGA181 Palestine; since that requires *nothing but lies*, and those in industrial quantities, there’s plenty of experience there to build on.
@Mark: “... one more aspect is the constant refrain, “Iran wants to ‘wipe Israel off the map’”.”
No ‘perhaps’ here; you are correct (not the wiping, but the highlighting of the scurrilous lie). Although ‘we the people’ are (in the current circumstances) powerless (see my previous), our tyrants make the pretence of ‘consulting’ us via elections, after thoroughly brainwashing us (there’s no alternative, more correct term). Note that there are multiple perpetrators; a) the tyrants themselves (with strings attached = puppets of their paymasters, including the ‘Israel Lobby’), b) the MSM + PFBCs, and c) the psychologists who design the propaganda. Over all, quote from Bernays: “Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”
[«back»]
-=*=-
^
Update, 18:49; PPS
I was thinking of posting an objection, then I thought something along the lines of 'casting pearls before swine.' Here's the draft:
It would seem that antiwar's "Your comment is awaiting moderation" may be invoked by an automaton triggered by content; in the continued absence of my comment time-stamped February 23rd, 2013 at 7:47 am (now over 2hrs ago at time of this submit, planned for 9:49), perhaps googling the following may be illuminative:
"@PEACE EVER AFTER" "@Mark" "Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism"
IMHO, the internet is a '24/7' operation, and while one can understand blog-owners' desire of exercising content-control and respecting their right to do so - such control should not be for overly-long, not on honest, non-abusive and significant content = what I write. Respectfully yours, etc..
[«back»]
-=*=-
Ref(s):
[1] deceive v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit. deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief. deceiver n. [POD]
[2] lie2 -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive. give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]
Abbreviations:
ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers
I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology
M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.
MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'
neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+
PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC
ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down
PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'
SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on
the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité
US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood
US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable
XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe
Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent aggressive war