UGLY is -
 as UGLY does
  - EU as ugly thugs

.. it's not what they say ...

  .. but what they do that counts ...

    .. the EU is supporting al-Qaeda criminals

Thesis/Subtitle: suppress the truth ...

Concomitant: ignore all dissent ...

Corollary: cripple democracy ...



How ugly is ugly? Let me count the ways:

1. Ask Catherine Ashton's mirror. Normally, what a perpetrator *looks* like is not a topic, nor do we usually 'do' ad-homs. But times have long gone *anti*-normal. On 'her face,' she'd be unelectable; what's she got to get her this job?

2. Ask Guido Westerwelle's boyfriend. Normally, a perpetrator's sex life is not a topic; wiki includes "openly gay person" - but Westerwelle's behaviour is a slur on the ('otherwise normal') gay community. Westerwelle talks with Turks, Jews and Jordan etc., all *against* Syria. IF you're not with ... "Germany has provided funds totalling 125 million euros in assistance for the Syrian people since the Syria crisis began." Q: To which side? A: Silly question.

3. Ask any other EU-official. They *collectively* implement sanctions & no longer ban arms delivery. As if any EU-ban ever stopped Saudi Arabia and Qatar delivering Croatian arms sourced via F+UK/NATO-smashed Libya to so-called (mostly foreign jihadi incl. al-Qaeda) 'rebels?'

4. Ask Ban Ki-moon, and any other UN-official. Fact is, the 'Western proxy' attacks on Syria could be stopped in a heartbeat - except the UN (+ other agencies, like here the EU) both 'allow' and actively support the so-called 'rebels,' and the subsequent vicious slaughter and destruction to continue.

There are many more uglies, but none uglier than the US/Zs.

End preamble.


Mainstream article:

US senator John McCain visits Syria as EU lifts arms embargo
Updated May 28, 2013 09:31:04
  «US senator John McCain, one of the strongest advocates of US military aid for the Syrian opposition, has crossed into Syria to meet with rebel leaders.
Mr McCain's visit came as British foreign secretary William Hague announced that the European Union (EU) has agreed to lift an arms embargo in order to be able to supply weapons to the rebels.»

Comment 1: Think about it. This *publicly* demonstrates that the US has such open access to so-called 'rebel' areas, that one of their 'highest' representatives can freely come and go. With CIA support, of course - *exactly* how the rebels are getting their arms and the foreign jihadi mercenaries are getting freighted in.

Comment 2: Seems that only Austria stood in the way: «"It's unfortunate we have now found a common position," said the Austrian Foreign Minister Michael Spindelegger in a negotiation break. He was angry that British and French [and] the other 25 EU states would seek to impose their position."» There you have it; F+UK 'leading' the warmongering, Germany amongst the more-war majority.


Alternative article:

US Makes Syria an ‘Offer it Can’t Refuse’ - again
By Finian Cunningham
May 27, 2013
  «In Mafia terms, it’s called “making an offer that can’t be refused”. The “offer” is not one of free choice between options that may benefit the object party. In reality, it is about setting up a scenario of duress, under which the object party is coerced to capitulate to detrimental terms of extreme prejudice determined cynically by the other party.
Last month, the Iranian FARS news agency reported that Syrian envoy to Iran, Adnan Mahmoud, disclosed that as far back as March 2011 - when the conflict was kicking off in Syria - that the then US Secretary of Defence, Robert Gates, had starkly told the Damascus government that it faced “a choice”.
The Syrian envoy to Iran was quoted by FARS as saying: “Of course, in the very first weeks of the conflict in Syria, the US Secretary of Defence [Robert Gates] sent a message to the Syrian government, and said we should have cut our ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran if we wanted to stop the war, and stressed that if we did so, they [the US] would provide us with whatever we want”. In other words, Washington was making Syria back then “an offer it couldn’t refuse”.»

Comment 1: Absolute shocker; to get the 'full effect,' read it all.

Comment 2: There're more than a few important points here; that the so-called 'pro-democracy revolution' went almost immediately violent, that the US *boasted* (covertly, now outed) that they could control = stop the violence, that the 'real' objective was to attack Iran. And so it goes; as soon as we hear "diplomacy" or "strategic," we know we're hearing from or about criminals.


Interpretive article:

Why Disinformation Works. In America “Truth has no Relevance. Only Agendas are Important”
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
May 25, 2013
  «What I have noticed is that whenever a stunning episode occurs, such as 9/11 or the Boston Marathon bombing, most everyone whether on the right or left goes along with the government’s explanation, because they can hook their agenda to the government’s account.» 

Comment 1: Surprise? Hardly.

Comment 2: Here, the 'lying narrative' would have a democratic revolution in Syria, opposed by a brutal tyrant. The truth is that the revolution is hardly democratic (except for a few deluded - US/NED, say – fomented fools), and the real tyrants are the US/Z rogue-regimes, plus their snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on, here the EU (except Austria).


Explanatory article:

European Union Directly Funds Al Qaeda Looting of Syrian oil
By Johannes Stern
May 20, 2013
  «According to a report yesterday in Britain’s Guardian newspaper, the European Union (EU) is directly funding US-backed Sunni Islamist terrorist groups fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime. These groups are looting oil in parts of eastern Syria that they control and then re-selling it to EU countries at rock-bottom prices.» 

Comment: Quelle surprise! (Not.) - Murder for oil - again? No, still.


Argument: There's no argument as to what's going on here; the 'Western' so-called 'leaders' are a) out of all control, specifically b) beyond our (we the people's = democratic) control, and c) engaged in criminal pursuits, namely murder for spoil. All together, 'Western rulers' = violent criminal tyrants.


Fazit: Gotta be stopped!

  (Newton's 1st law: No change without force.)



[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]


ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-C*4 = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe (one-way) cliff

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = perpetual aggressive war


  1. Die Zeit: Israel threatens Russia over Syria help - haw. Now it starts to get interesting; the Israeli government knows "what to do" if Russia [equips] Syria... with *defensive* S-300s! Q: Will the Zs attack Russia? Q2: What else do they mean, with knowing "what to do?" Time to force the lying, cheating, murdering-to-steal Zionists to face up to their vicious crimes, time for *the world* to force Israel to vacate all land/property stolen from pre-UNGA181 Palestine, time for *the world* to acknowledge the Zionist crimes, time for justice to be served.

  2. D&R = divide and rule; Arab/Muslims have fully fallen into the US/Zs' trap. If not reversed, that imbecility could well lead to the Arab/Muslims' permanent decline if not demise (admittedly hard to kill a billion+, even for US/Zs, and for all Zs' genocidal ethnic cleansing).

    To the Zeit article, now add WP & AusBC. The Z-threat to Russia is in each, allowing for editing, and least specific in the AusBC (= not faithfully full&fair reporting = proof of AusBC guilt.)

    AusBC quotes a Z: "we will know what to do, ..." - interpreted in the other articles as 'attack the Russian shipment(s)' [WP: "Israel is prepared to use force to stop the delivery"] - sure to amuse the Russians - and *proof* that it's the Zs who are the greatest threat to ME+world peace.

    Commenting on the end of the EU arms embargo, ... «Louay Safi, a spokesman for Syria's main opposition National Coalition, said the decision was a positive step, but that he was afraid it could be "too little, too late".
    "The Syrian people are disappointed. They thought that democracies care about those who seek democracy," Mr Safi said.»

    This is a lie, deliberately deployed to deceive, conduited by the AusBC without comment - proof of AusBC's deceitful practice.

    How the above is a lie, is that there's precious little democracy in the destruction of Syria now being orchestrated by US/F+UK&ilk, only a few (US/NED?) fomented fools active in Mar'11, before the violent local then invading Al-Qaeda et al. mercenaries took over. Same modus operandi as Libya.

    As at any crime scene, there are the prime-perpetrators, then accomplices, apologists and idle bystanders. *All* who actively aid a perpetrator make themselves guilty by the accessory-mechanism, and all who do not move to stop a crime in progress also attract part-guilt.

    *None* of the US/Zs, F+UK, NATO, EU *and* UN are acting to stop the rape of Syria, in fact the exact opposite, they are all actively helping the slaughter and destruction - except for the UN, whose job it is to prevent war - but does SFA = sweet f**k-all effective. Law? What law? Justice? What justice? Criminals all, attacking + helping to attack + not stopping the attack on Syria = supreme international crime.