truth vs. lies [green revolution (Iran)]

 .. Q: What else is new? ...

   .. A: Not a lot - for a looong time, now

-=*=-

[NOTE: THIS IS A COMMENT TO green revolution (Iran); BLOGGER HAS IMPOSED A 4095 CHAR LIMIT]

-=*=-

There's a subsequent Cole (sorry; long 'snip'):

Sunday, June 14, 2009
Class v. Culture Wars in Iranian Elections: Rejecting Charges of a North Tehran Fallacy
  «Khatami received 70 percent of the vote in 1997. He then got 78% of the vote in 2001, despite a crowded field. In 2000, his reform movement captured 65% of the seats in parliament. He is a nice man, but you couldn't exactly categorize him as a union man or a special hit with farmers.

The evidence is that in the past little over a decade, Iran's voters had become especially interested in expanding personal liberties, in expanding women's rights, and in a wider field of legitimate expression for culture (not just high culture but even just things like Iranian rock music). The extreme puritanism of the hardliners grated on people.

The problem for the reformers of the late 1990s and early 2000s was that they did not actually control much, despite holding elected office. Important government policy and regulation was in the hands of the unelected, clerical side of the government. The hard line clerics just shut down reformist newspapers, struck down reformist legislation, and blocked social and economic reform. The Bush administration was determined to hang Khatami out to dry, ensuring that the reformers could never bring home any tangible success in foreign policy or foreign investment. Thus, in the 2004 parliamentary elections, literally thousands of reformers were simply struck off the ballot and not allowed to run. This application of a hard line litmus test in deciding who could run for office produced a hard line parliament, naturally enough.» 
[juancole.com/]

A commenter cites a Fisk:

Iran erupts as voters back 'the Democrator'
A smash in the face, a kick in the balls – that's how police deal with protesters after Iran's poll kept the hardliners in power
Sunday, 14 June 2009
  «An interval here for lunch with a true and faithful friend of the Islamic Republic, a man I have known for many years who has risked his life and been imprisoned for Iran and who has never lied to me. We dined in an all-Iranian-food restaurant, along with his wife. He has often criticised the regime. A man unafraid. But I must repeat what he said. "The election figures are correct, Robert. Whatever you saw in Tehran, in the cities and in thousands of towns outside, they voted overwhelmingly for Ahmadinejad. Tabriz voted 80 per cent for Ahmadinejad. It was he who opened university courses there for the Azeri people to learn and win degrees in Azeri. In Mashad, the second city of Iran, there was a huge majority for Ahmadinejad after the imam of the great mosque attacked Rafsanjani of the Expediency Council who had started to ally himself with Mousavi. They knew what that meant: they had to vote for Ahmadinejad."» 
[independent/fisk]

(Note: This is a quote of a quote of a quote. Some 'perspective' could be applied.)

-=*=-

Then, we take a 'breather.'

When it comes to 'democracy' we the sheople - in Aus; US, UK, Israel even - let alone Iran - simply do not have a 'prayer.'

(And "NO!" - I'm bloody-well *NOT* a 'believer!' Cooling down...)

-=*=-

An 'oldie' for sure, but still applicable; I recall it was in the time of Gorton (we lived in his street and were invited to the 'moving-out' party (vetted by ASIO - one supposes; recall the Petty caricature.)) Ooops! Ah, yeah: "The Mushroom Club." See? - Told you: 'still applicable.'

One hardly needs a Sherlock to detect it; and not even a TV to broadcast it. The AusBC 'hoodwinked' me back around '67, and all we had then was (steam powered) radio. I'm talking about the utterly vicious lie that the AusBC propagated, the one about "David vs. Goliath" going down in the ME. We (those with eyes to see) now know the truth about murdering, stealing IL, and the all the poor, hapless Palestinians, killed outright or 'merely' driven off their land. (Q: Did you know, that Deir Yassin is only about 1400m from IL's new, you-beaut *holocaust* museum? Yeah.))

Where was I? Oh, yeah (again); democracy. Briefly, of what one might term the absolute minimum constellation, namely a switched-on and educated public, a wide range of honest candidates, and free, full and fair information-flows - we've got, effectively - *none*.

It ill behoves the US - or any of innumerable other dysfunctional democracies - to comment on any other country (Iran, say) - before they properly fix their own systems.

-=*end*=-

PS Did you note in passing in the Cole citation, how the US regime as good as crippled a genuine reforming faction in Iran? «The Bush administration was determined to hang Khatami out to dry.» Charming, eh? Shows the damage such erring ideologues can do. Notice also, how a popular govt. had so little effect on the actual policies being implemented. Sound familiar?

Q: If you wanted Aus to stop siding with the (rabid dog) US, or the (illegitimate tail) Israel, or bring our boys home from Afghanistan, who would you vote for?

QED, I'd say.

(QED? But - s/he's not on the list??! - (Exactly - slow learner.))
 

reductio ad uranium ... (Iran, N.Korea; aka 'the goodies')

 .. err, - reptilian? ...

   .. actually absurdum ...

     .. as well; all three, that is

-=*=-

Preamble: Instantly, I spring to my own defence: I don't necessarily agree with N.Korea *having* an A-bomb, and as far as I can 'see,' (IAEA, latest US NIE, etc.) Iran is *not* working on any A-bomb, but in any case; since the US & Israel a) both have the bomb, b) that the US has actually deployed nukular bombs (The bombs killed as many as 140,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki ... largely innocent civilians), and c) both the US and Israel threaten, as in this chilling little 'charmer:'

On being asked:
«"Prime Minister, ... if ever Israel was in danger of being defeated on the battlefield, it would be prepared to take the region and the whole world down with it?"»
Golda Meir did say:
«"Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying."» 
[ICH/Alan Hart/Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews]

Comment: This is utterly typical; Israel, with about .001% of the world's population, holds the rest (99.999%) hostage. Yeah; that'd be about 'right.' Recall that all the while IL distracts the world with its filthy criminality, the climate-catastrophe gets ever closer, ever less avoidable. And, of course, it won't be just the I/J/Z-plex that needs an ark. Or a fire-proof bunker, or 'manna from heaven' (haw!)

Also, I don't necessarily agree with totalitarian regimes (I'm mindful of gibes (jeering remark, taunt) by lying r-wing trolls: "You must support Pol Pot then eh?"), nor do I support religion of any flavour. Not just 'BTW,' dare you examine this?

5:00am The Rhythm Divine
with Geoff Wood. World sacred music, everything from chant to the charts
...
7:00am Encounter
Exploring religion and life - this latter was a real shocker today[1]; heard the intro and nearly went to heaven! (It means "Hit the roof.")

-=*=-

Main: Uranium, reptilian and absurdum.

1. Uranium. First of all, 'they' lie to us; the MSM (as usual, including the AusBC: Boo! Hiss!) - the politicians (ours (Aus) and theirs (US, Israel)); lying *should* be against the law. In fact, when it 'suits' them, 'misleading parliament' can lead to 'discipline' being deployed, and as we can plainly see, 'laws' are often 'honoured' - in the breach (think: illegal invasions, or torture, say.) The only laws should be *just* laws; only just laws may be a) accepted, let alone b) enforced. Again 'in fact,' just laws would need almost no enforcing; 'everybody' can see that just laws are in their own interest. (The actual 'sickos,' the exceptions, aka the criminal psychopaths, still need 'sorting,' then 'exporting.')

In clear text: As long as some countries have nukular bombs, there is simply *no* possibility of forbidding others from possessing them as well. Again in clear text: Iran and N.Korea both *need* nukular bombs - as a proper defence, given the illegal threats they have trust upon them (bellicose US to innocent Iran: "All options!")

2. Reptilian, aka dumbed down. It's simply obvious - to those of us left, the conscious ones, still with a conscience. First, 'they' (the propagandists, turned 'public relationists,' then morphed into 'marketers') - manipulated ('manufactured') demand. They 'customised' the sheople. Later, they invented 'focus groups,' enabling them to accurately 'advertise' the (then limited) wares they were pushing. Even later still, with 'computer aided design/manufacture,' they could better 'target' the market with customised goods. But all the time, they were tricking the sheople, selling them stuff they (mostly) didn't really need. The actual 'reptilian;' the propagandists have bypassed the so-called 'higher functions' (The Enlightenment, say) - by appealing to the primitive, the reptilian, or 'hind brain' - yep; just as in dinosaurs.

In clear text: The sheople have been bought off, with the modern equivalent of beads and feathers. The 'social contract' has not just been violated, it's been shredded and thrown to the winds. (Let's not start: down-sizing, out-sourcing, off-shoring, sub-contracting, no deserved, restful retirement in sight; medicine for profit (instead of health!!?) - the sheople squeezed from every possible direction. The trickle-down - has *toadally* dried up; nobody gives a shit for any other except for "Me, me, me!")

3. Absurdum. Really, daaarlings, I mean - just how silly is that?

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] Sunday 14 June 2009
Image of God (rpt.)
The power and the mystery of the human face. From the representation of Christ in religious art, and the hidden face of God in Judaism, to modern cosmetic surgery and the experience of facial disfigurement.

Comment: This is possibly indicative. 'They' (the AusBC) speak of 'Christ' and (some) 'God' as if both actually exist, then go on to modern cosmetic surgery, an article about which *in Iran* I commented on years ago. (Young Iranian women are sooo politically conscious, that they think "a nose-job" will fix their (and therefore the world's) problems.) Another loop complete. (Was that "loop" or "loopy?")

Comment: More than just a bit 'superficial,' eh??!
 

green revolution (Iran)

 .. a conspiracy theory ...

   .. with wicked AusBC types ...

     .. up to their lying bottom lips in it

-=*=-

Tin-foil hat time? No, not really; and I'm not suggesting that any wicked AusBC types were actually personally involved in attempts at subverting democracy in Iran. But I am betting that subversion *was* attempted - by secret agents and other erring ideologue running dogs and stalking horses of you-know-which wicked rogue regimes.

At just about any crime scene, means, motive & opportunity must be considered; and 'agents' with matching modi operandi will naturally draw attention to themselves.

Also, any coincidences immediately draw suspicion.

And so it was and is, in the run-up to and aftermath of the just concluded Iranian presidential elections. The AusBC seemed unnaturally interested, uncannily well informed, and had all the 'right' sound-bites/video to go with - their very own conspiracy theory, namely a green revolution purported to be 'on the go' to overthrow Ahmadinejad. As evidence, recall the AusBC video segment they broadcast repeatedly, showing happy faces and green items of all types and shades; a rally craftily confected and cagily staged for maximum propaganda effect - one suspects; modus operandi all over again. A real give-away is the expression on V. Haussegger's face whenever Iran or N.Korea gets a mention (i.e. try getting her to say 'denier' or 'provocation' and then observe her facial contortions - and especially, her bottom lip.) Then, what is truly remarkable, is the outrage in the AusBC voices as they decry the result, as if to screech: "How dare they so defile democracy??!" (Haw. As if the Iranians would bother, and as if our own 'Western' democracies actually properly functioned... Think "MSM lies," think "Lib/Lab pug-ugly twins," think "dumbed-down voters," think "Hanging chads;" think "Diebold." Haw again! Aw, stop it! - Ow, it hurts!) What is it with these AusBC types? Looks like they have a personal interest - in the 'dark side;' and here of course I'm referring to the you-know-which wicked rogue regimes.

And again no, I'm definitely *not* talking about Iran or N.Korea; each of those hapless countries, basically just wishing to mind their own business, has just as much 'right' as any others - to fiddle around with nukular whatevers; it is in fact the you-know-which wicked rogue regimes who/which in one case actually deployed A-bombs (100s of 1000s of innocent victims slaughtered), and in the other, spitting in the face of the NPT, threatens the whole ME, in the name of 61+ years of murdering to steal "Lebensraum" for invading, mostly 'Western,' mostly foreign & mostly *illegal* settlers.
 

where the fault lies (rip-offs, excess CO2)

 .. haw, haw, haw! ...

   .. double double entendre ...

     .. beat that - or someone gets hurt

-=*=-

First, a 'joke:' Two 'pilots' enter the cabin, after everyone is properly seated (luggage stowed in o-head lockers, or a few small bits under the seat in front of them; seat-backs upright and all seat-belts fastened). The 'pilots' have impenetrably black 'sun'-glasses on, and carry looong, white canes ... tap, tap, tap! The cockpit door closes behind them, the engines start then rev up - and slowly, the 'plane taxis out. After a short pause at the threshold, the 'plane ROARS down the runway ... seemingly interminably ... then, all of a sudden, the passengers all shriek! - And the 'plane soars into the air.

"Phew!" - says one 'pilot' to the other - one day, they're gunna shriek just that little bit too late!

-=*=-

What seems like a vast majority (as if it were some sort of 'democracy') - of our 'very best' scientists tell us, that excess CO2 is accumulating in the atmosphere, as a result of human activity, namely the burning of 'fossil' carbon. (It wouldn't matter much, if all we burnt, we first grew. That'd be pretty-well 'sustainable.') But, in the first place it is a certain amount of CO2 that makes our planet as habitable as it has been, due to the so-called 'greenhouse' effect, and in the 2nd (and becoming more immediate case), this newly added, excess CO2 will lead to higher temperatures (somewhere). It stands to reason. Higher temperatures (somewhere) are likely to lead to more weather (Q: Why? A: Weather is just the world's way of transporting solar energy, mostly deposited near the equator, to the N&S poles, where it more easily radiates away into space.) Here, 'more weather' is assumed to be not a good thing. (Think: more floods in some parts, more fires, droughts etc. in others. Just like in Aus these past few years.) Except:

There are certain people who either do *not* accept, do not *wish* to accept, or outright *decry/deny* anthropomorphic climate change - for various reasons - but obviously not long-term 'self-preservation' ones. One assumes that the non-acceptors and especially the *deniers*, are going for some (very!) short term, self-advantage; like - err, coal diggers & sellers, say. Or perhaps they're 'merely' erring ideologues.

Thesis: that our democracies are dysfunctional. Well, again 'everybody' knows, that a) the sheople are dumbed-down, b) are fed on a diet of 'disinformation' - when not outright, propagandistic lies (listening, Aunty?) and c) the elected representatives, themselves drawn from an effectively non-choice pool - tend (massive understatement) to represent anyone *but* we, the sheople. All given; democracy kaput.

But the 4th: what if our democracies were ever so slightly responsive, to the vicissitudes of expressed opinion?

Well, then; in such a case, it is the 'climate sceptics' (as the loudest, most easily accommodated 'squeaky wheel') - who are currently 'in control' (also obviously, since nothing effective is being done). When the penny finally drops and the sheople all shriek *climate catastrophe!* - well, then, we can at least lay blame where it belongs - by all means the coal diggers & sellers, but especially those self-same climate sceptics, who 'drove' the weak and lily-livered 'decision makers,' our so-called politician 'leaders.' If so-called 'leaders' are unresponsive, or listen to the wrong voices, AND TAKE WRONG OR NO EFFECTIVE ACTION, then no matter what the 'excuse,' it's leadership failure.

-=*=-

It will not help, of course, after the fact - but at least we'll know who to lynch. The fault very definitively lies with the representatives who fail to properly represent, but (the last); IF representatives are at all responsive THEN they are presumed to have misbehaved based on those filthy liars, the climate-sceptic spruikers.

-=*end*=-

PS Q: What's about the joke?

A: Silly question; how soon is too late?
 

message to Obama ...

 .. GO HOME YANK!

-=*=-

The 1st 100 days have come and gone. The US, now under the latest freak - Ooops! Err, president, has *increased* the tempo of killing in Afghanistan. Iraq is a smoking ruin. Now, by far the largest (and by far and away the least scrupulous (IDF excepted)) military on the whole wide, once-pretty planet is dragging mass-death & destruction into Pakistan too.

June 5 -7, 2009
What Are We to Make of His Speech?
Obama in Cairo
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
  «In his first 100 days, Obama managed to create two million Pakistani refugees. It took Israel 60 years to create 3.5 million Palestinian refugees.» 
[counterpunch/roberts]

The US, it seems, only has the one weapon - a brutal, mostly innocent-civilian slaughtering military, and a single, strangling philosophy; rip-off casino-capitalism. The so-called 'top' 1% have now got almost all the money - and the bottom xx% as good as none. How can the 'real' economy ever even begin to function?

Together with both these 'charming' attributes, Obama struts the world stage. At home, many of his own people are on the verge of starvation - ½mio per month *extra* unemployed; private medical 'insurance' that is a cruel and almost universally unaffordable (sick!) joke, mass home repossessions, banks/FIRE-sector gone totally berserk (and being propped-up using squillions of tax-payer funded, Fed-printed otherwise worthless fiat/tax-dollars)... Hardly worth a mention are the 'big-3' car makers; since as far back as the 50's producers of *really shitty*, utterly absurd gas-guzzlers, now *finally*, rightfully going bankrupt. And anything/everything possible - rip-off privatised, down-sized, out-sourced or shipped off-shore. Have I missed some foul failure?

It's time to say 'ENOUGH!'

Oh, yeah; and return Palestine to the Palestinians.
 

cognitive dissonance (love vs. lies)

 .. 'gets' me every time ...

   .. love vs. hypocrisy, lies ...

     .. and thieving, murdering crime

-=*=-

  «Because the sky is blue.......aaaaaaaahhhh» 

Blue/half-open sky, alternates between grey/occasional drizzle. (Rain-shadow keeps us mostly dry.)


  «Boy, you gotta carry that weight
   Carry that weight a long time» 

Didn't ask to be born; but sooner or later booted from the nest. It's only fair - to have to support yourself; filthy, criminal predators, or more correctly cowardly, armed and bullying bludgers just aren't needed.


  «Here comes the sun king
   Here comes the sun king
   Everybody's laughing
   Everybody's happy
   Here comes the sun king» 

Of course, it's Obama. Does he mean what he says? Does he say what he means? Wouldn't it be nice, if he actually spoke the truth to us? (And stopped the truly awful killings, and other filthy US/Israeli-regime's murdering-to-thieve crimes?)

(The song breaks down into foreign-sounding rubbish; jumbled Spanish? Italian? - that doesn't mean anything, at least not to solely English speakers; incomprehensible, possibly purely nonsensical ...)


  «And in the end
   The love you take
   Is equal to the love you make.» 

Some people say that love is all you need.

-=*end*=-

PS Love sure beats lying, cheating, theft and murder.
 

the Lakoffian® 'holocaust' minefield

 .. 'perfect,' (lying!) propaganda ...

   .. the I/J/Z-plex sickly exploits it ...

     .. but others may not even discuss it

-=*=-

Preamble: I was talking to a friend, and the holocaust 'topic' surfaced. I said: "Madness. Even to mention it is to fall into an I/J/Z-plex framing trap, where no argument is possible (and the goodies can't win)." He expostulated: "Wha-a-at!!?" I explained, that no rational discussion was possible; that the maddies had so muddied the water, that it's best just to say "Yes. Nazis definitely bad." - and then move on. Of course some discussion ensued; associated topics like 'freedom of speech' and 'honesty in politics' being prominent.

-=*=-

Context: There are many 'strings;' IMHO the highest priority of all is the putative excess-CO2 caused climate change, where I'm forced to write both putative and change in italics - exactly because climate change sceptics currently 'hold sway,' preventing the world from taking any effective action towards saving itself - if damaging climate change really is on the way. Of course, IF a climate change catastrophe does occur, THEN it's all over, Rover. I have to include this para, but it's not what I'm on about - here; nor am I on about the dangers of resource depletion - which will happen all the faster sooner, as ever more resources are gobbled up (some unavoidably, lots profligately) - by ever more people.

Eclipsing the above terminally serious topics are the rampant rogue regimes of the US and Israel. These two, aka the illegitimate tail wagging the rabid dog, plus the UK poodle and Aus dag make up the Anglo/Judaic axis of evil, and that axis is embedded in the so-called 'West.' (Why France and Germany are in this worries me; apparently at least Merkel is starting to wake up.) Now the greatest sin of the US is not its profligate (that word again) consumption, but how it goes about acquiring the resources it Oh, so obscenely devours. (Gluttony is a sin; 5% world's pop. consuming 25% world's resources.) The predominate method of US resource acquisition is to rip them off via inadequate compensation to the sovereign resource owners (see 'resource rent' or 'rent seeking,' say); any resistors to their crooked modus operandi being chastened by, not to put too fine a point on it, armed robbery with actual, murdering violence. (See Perkins' "Economic Hit Man." Latest example: Iraq.) Ditto for Israel; 61+ years long now, mass-murdering for mainly Palestinian land and water. Nothing in these two paras will be new to regular readers 'in here,' and that's the end of my context-setting.

Q: How do these villains get away with such horrendously vile crimes?

A: 1) The criminals lie about it; 2) the sheople do not seem to notice, or if they do, they just say effectively "So what?" But who really knows what the sheople think - if they think at all? This is not arrogance talking, but sadness: why are so many people so apparently apathetic about the disgusting, murdering criminality - of our so-called 'leaders?'

-=*=-

My 'morning ritual' (not followed 'religiously' - I'm no 'believer' (Haw!)) - is to rouse to AusBC's AM - usually, in more ways than one - getting roused, I mean. This morning differed little from many others:

1. Obama tells Ahmadinejad to visit Nazi death camp

2. Obama slams Holocaust deniers in camp visit

3. Iran has enough uranium for nuclear bomb: UN

Apart from noting (with distaste) the 'editorial style' ("Xxx slams Yyy"), the last shall be first:

  «The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, says Iran has more than 1,300 kilograms of low-enriched uranium, which is well over the amount needed to make a single nuclear bomb.» 
[AusBC/justin, ibid.]

There are several ways to tell lies[1], this uranium item includes a few - IMHO. One assumes that the IAEA did report the low-enriched 1300Kgs, but what the sheople are presumed *not* to know, is that 'low-enriched' is perfectly useless in building A-bombs (technical accuracy: one needs very highly enriched - something entirely different from 'low.' Iran, as far as anyone knows, only has low.) IF, as is insinuated, the IAEA went on to say 'amount needed' THEN the IAEA lied by inaccuracy, or IF the IAEA did *not* make that connection (my 'tip'), THEN the BBC lied. Whatever the case, the AusBC lied to us - by retailing the (totally misleading!) story.

The AusBC does this sort of thing - i.e. lying to us - all the time.

-=*=-

The Holocaust: Whoops! Warning! Warning! - Lakoffian® trap![2]

1. By now, we all know what the Holocaust was. ("Yes. Nazis definitely bad." Move on.)

2. And we should know, that despite all the poison being spat at us via and on their own behalf by the MSM (with AusBC: bad Aunty!), Ahmadinejad is *not* an Holocaust denier[3] per se, but does deny that the Holocaust justifies slaughtering Palestinians, which Israel has now criminally been doing for 61+ years.

3. Also, we heard from Obama that he wanted to 'make a new start' towards Muslims AND Iran.

4. Sooo, what's up? It simply cannot be (inconsistency), that Obama wants to 'make friends' with Iran - by making such 'incendiary' accusations. Which, not at all coincidentally, rev the sheople up - looks to me like actual "hate speech" from Obama directed at Iran via Ahmadinejad, to cause what? An acceptance by the sheople of an attack on Iran?

Whatever the case, it's pure hypocrisy for Obama to say one thing one day, then the opposite the next.

Fazit: However these criminals lie, it's IF lie THEN no credibility.

-=*end*=-

PS Here's a good item on what Israel is up to:

June 4, 2009
The Future of Israel and the Decline of the American Empire
The Wages of Hubris and Vengeance
By ARNO J. MAYER
  «Although its leaders avoid saying so in public, Israel does not want peace, or a permanent comprehensive settlement, except on its own terms. They do not dare spell these out publicly, as they presume the enemy’s unconditional surrender, even enduring submission. Instead the Palestinians continue to be blamed for a chronic state of war that entails Israel’s continuing self-endangerment and militarization. This policy’s underlying strategic premise is the need to prevent any significant change in the West Asian balance of power.» 
[counterpunch/mayer]

Comment: This raises the spectre of the 'middle east peace process.' It's a lie; nobody can seriously pursue peace for sooo long, with sooo little (i.e. zero) success. Another lie pushed at us daily by, amongst others, the (rotten!) AusBC.

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] lie2 —n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. —v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [POD]

[2] Framing (social sciences)
  «A frame in social theory consists of a schema of interpretation—that is, a collection of stereotypes—that individuals rely on to understand and respond to events. In psychology, framing is influenced by the background of a context choice and the way in which the question is worded.» 
[wiki/Framing]

[3] denier2
noun a person who denies something: a denier of God. [Oxford Pop-up]