.. Israel is a 'living' proof of failure ...
.. as was Vietnam, Cambodia etc. ...
.. as is Iraq, Afghanistan - Iran next (and 'living' in quotes - because of all the murdering)
-=*=-
Some people are making some noise about a 60-year anniversary of the establishment of the Geneva conventions, as if there was some positive involved.
Basically, all such 'celebrants' should be taken out and shot - but only after being exquisitely painfully tortured.
Sounds bad? I say it for effect, that should be perfectly clear - but there's a real and viable purpose. Namely, murdering Palestinians in order to steal their land is far worse - a vile criminal act and continued acts; all was enabled basically by the same types who set up the Geneva conventions. All a stupid sham: the UN whose job it is to stop any war happening actually 'allows' wars (by not effectively opposing them), from its inception down to today, and the so-called 'world-leader' tortures and mass-murders at will.
Look at Af-Pak, the drone murders. An expert freely admitted that the 'effectiveness' of drone attacks may be as low as 2% - in killing some nominated targets, not even allowing for the grisly, illegal fact that those targets are being summarily executed on suspicion, or even merely on someone's senseless say-so. Country or countries of laws? Sick, bad, worst of all 'jokes.'
-=*=-.
The UN was set up to stop war - they should *honestly* admit their failures; fold their tents and disappear. As for the "Geneva conventions," imagine setting up rules for wars? Idiotic!!
What we need is *NO WAR!*
-=*=-
It may have been, that the idiots who allowed the 'establishment' of the so-called 'modern' state of Israel had somehow deluded themselves that ejecting the legal owner/occupants of Palestine was somehow justified - but as soon as the murders began (the Deir Yassin type massacres), that should have caused a massive re-think - and reversal. The Zionists and their running-dogs occupying now sadly mostly ex-Palestine were and still are alien and illegal invaders, and should be treated as such - as in Nuremberg/gallows.
Similar for the world's other major alien and illegal invaders, the US in Iraq and Afghanistan - or Iran really will be next.
The US + Israel 'get away with it' because of two significant factors, one is the propagandising of the people (telling lies to people turns them into, amongst other things, insensitive sheople; here's a story: "40pc think torturing enemy soldiers OK") - the other factor is the so-called 'do-gooders' who set up the UN and the Geneva conventions, those people are playing straight into the filthy, lying murderers' hands.
What those so-called 'do-gooders' should be doing is saying *NO WAR!* - and making it stick.
Which means all Zs *out* of Palestine, and all US to *go home*.
Otherwise the world will continue to suffer the depredations of these vicious criminals, as they mercilessly murder to steal.
2009-08-12
moral pygmies (UN/Geneva conventions; US, Israel, more...)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
And they continue to try to cook up a war:
ReplyDeleteWestern officials leaked stories to the Associated Press and Reuters last week aimed at pressuring the outgoing chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, to include a summary of intelligence alleging that Iran has been actively pursuing work on nuclear weapons in the IAEA report due out this week.
The aim of the pressure for publication of the document appears to be to discredit the November 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on the Iranian nuclear programme, which concluded that Iran had ended work on nuclear weapons in 2003.
On the latest IAEA report.
Gordon Prather.
The Egyptian Envoy to the Non-Aligned Movement has sent a formal letter to fellow Egyptian Mohamed ElBaradei – Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency Secretariat – urging him to support the inclusion, at next week’s regular session of the IAEA General Conference, an agenda item sponsored by virtually all members of the Non-Aligned Movement entitled "Prohibition of Armed Attack or Threat of Attack Against [IAEA Safeguarded] Nuclear Installations, During Operation or Under Construction."
But there has already been one:
Here are excerpts from UN Security Council Resolution 487 condemning that Israeli pre-emptive strike.
"Fully aware of the fact that Iraq has been a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons since it came into force in 1970, that, in accordance with that treaty, Iraq has accepted IAEA safeguards on all its nuclear activities, and that the agency has testified that these safeguards have been satisfactorily applied to date;
"Strongly condemns the military attack by Israel – in clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international conduct;
"Calls upon Israel to refrain in the future from any such acts or threats thereof;
"Further considers that the said attack constitutes a serious threat to the entire IAEA safeguards regime, which is the foundation of the non-proliferation treaty."
The Goldstone report has been released. Juan Cole.
ReplyDeleteDemocracyNow!.
Official Israeli responses have been predictable, as in this example:
In spite of everything I’ve just said, Israel is going to study this report and to examine it very carefully, as we have with all the national and international human rights reports. We are taking this seriously, and we are committed, as always, to abide by international law.
Yes, sure you are.
Israeli PR lies
ReplyDelete.. more front than Mark Foys ...
.. "Not factual" he asserted ...
.. but all you need is to look at Palestine
-=*=-
G'day Bob,
.. yeah; heard it this AM on my steam-powered radio.
That smarmy, Hollywood-style groomed Israeli PR person, as noted above, pushing bald-faced lies as his opening gambit. But as your recent haaretz citation showed, they can lie like troopers - and that far more often than not. They even admit to lying as a tactic - in what is becoming an impossible attempt to hide their vicious crimes. Why the world ever allowed the Zs to invade Palestine is utterly beyond me.
It's a sad (actually criminal) reflection on the Diaspora that allows these lies to be pushed, and an absolute outrage that our publicly financed broadcasters pass such rubbish on mostly without any critical comment at all. Then, there are the outright propagandists, throwing gratuitous accusations of "anti-Semitism," as Ern related here. This demonstrates not just failing analysis by the accusers (the correct term would be anti-Jewish, but that's presumably too close to the bone), but also (IMHO) criminal intent, for to assist criminals (Israelis murdering to steal Palestinian land) makes such filthy apologists into accessories - usually considered equally guilty under law.
And Id, they lie to presidents as well ... on the matter of Israel's nukes and influence.
ReplyDeleteWell, it's not 'just' the lies, is it - and as at any crime scene, one asks Q: Who benefits? G'day Bob, again. I note that some actions are cited as proof that "confirm the illegitimacy of the Zionist enterprise." But really, who in their right mind could ever allow that the original and 61+year continuing theft of Palestinian land by (illegally) invading Zs, those Zs murdering to steal, was ever legitimate at all? Perhaps the single factor of media complicity in disguising the crimes, plus the seeming inability of the sheople to grasp reality are the only things which stand between the Z-criminals and the Nuremberg-style gallows?
ReplyDelete.. Oh, yeah; and the will to seek justice via truth.
ReplyDelete