US/Zs guns, bombs *shit* for brains

.. murdering for spoil ...

  .. IF the caps fits ...

    .. THEN wear it

Thesis/Subtitle: I agitate for truth and justice

Concomitant: evil *must* be actively opposed

Corollary: starting with the *worst* offenders

-=*=-
 
 [update, 15Aug'12]

-=*=-

Preamble, lemmas:

1. “Though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; ...the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression.”
~Jefferson

2. “... to dedicate the living to the struggle to ensure that "government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”
~Lincoln

3. “... The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”
~Bernays

4. “The process [of mass-media deception] has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies all this is indispensably necessary."
~Orwell

5. At any crime-scene, we ask the std. Qs: Who had the means, motive, opportunity plus any modus operandi and cui bono?

6. Lies are pre- and post-requisites for crime; proof = criminals *must* lie, if only to avoid self-incrimination.

7; posit: *No* worthwhile project ever requires any 'lie/deception,' any single (non-trivial) lie destroys all credibility; the associated project = sham.

End lemmas.

-=*=-

Preamble, cases (saying one thing, doing another):

1. It's easy to prove that the democracies of US & Israel (as many others in 'the West') are sham; consider "All politicians lie!" - (thanks, but "No, thanks!" to JWHoward), then find any applicable (non-trivial) lie.

1a. Israel's lie is claiming some 'right to exist;' see I/J/Z-plex below. Individual people of course, but the IL-entity itself is based on an un-remedied, Nuremberg-class crime = IL is illegitimate. Further, IL's *continued* crimes are also of the 'against humanity' class. [new:] Also see PPS.

1b. One of the US's lies is to claim some 'high moral ground,' while their true objective is to force their systems onto other countries, partly ideological but mainly economic = to rip resources off (economic rent there-from, also control thereof), by various degrees of persuasion through coercion, then - not if but when - all else fails, by violence, i.e. military conquest, say. See Perkins' "Economic Hit Man."

1c. As if being lied to were not enough, there are more crimes against democracy afoot, specifically to do with Lincoln's "of, by and for the people." The easiest to see is via Bernays' manipulation; that contradicts Jefferson's 'will of the majority;' any such 'democracy' = sham. That the MSM+PFBCs transmit and often *actively assist* the manipulation proves the MSM+PFBCs to be corrupt&venal accessories to crime.

1d. One more; what they say = 'safeguarding the world's oil supply' - say, while what they do = attack oil-owners' countries - as if they were doing us, we the people a favour, or even some 'required' service. This is contradicted in two ways, a) the oil would be pumped & delivered totally without US' intervention anyway, but b) the effects of the mainly US' economic ideology, what I summarise under 'neoliberalism,' is provably *not* in we the people's interest, thus giving the lie to the US' claimed motive = 'helping' us vis-à-vis oil-supply, by attacking Iraq (Libya, now Syria on the way to attacking Iran), say.

2. Following (1) and the modus operandi deployed = murdering violence, both the US & Z regimes are *rogue*. All to be seen, by those who wish to see.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

Syria and the Invisible Hand of Foreign Intervention
Eric S. Margolis
August 10, 2012
  «Even if the Bashar al-Assad regime manages to hang on in Syria, that country’s economy is being wrecked, its people driven into poverty and neighbors tempted to intervene. Israel just threatened to attack Syria’s modest store of chemical weapons. Turkey is stumbling into the morass, egged on by the Saudis and Gulf Arabs. Russia’s national prestige is increasingly involved in Syria—which is as close to its borders as northern Mexico is to the United States. Iran may yet get involved.
...
According to Reuters sources, the United States may have worked with Turkish allies to set up a command HQ at Adana, close to its Incirlik airbase in eastern Turkey near the Syrian border. This is where it would make sense for U.S. intelligence to coordinate the flow of arms, communications gear, medical supplies, food and munitions to the Syrian rebels.
Other unverified reports from the Mideast suggest that the U.S. mercenary firm formerly known as Blackwater (it recently changed its name to Academi) is training Syrian rebels in Turkey, moving in veteran mercenaries from Iraq, where there were once fifty thousand U.S.-paid private soldiers, and sending combat units into Syria.» 
[antiwar/nationalinterest/Margolis]

Comment: Very little to none of the above is openly discussed in the MSM+PFBCs, the main thrust of many 'reports' is to assert Assad bad, 'rebels' good. But we *know* that organisations like NED have been subverting the 'Muslim/Arab' homelands, fomenting trouble wherever 'strategic,' and the CIA&Co run covert operations; secrecy is an implacable enemy of democracy.

Trigger article 2:

Terrorism as an Instrument of US Foreign Policy: UN-Backed Rogue States Plan Syria’s Slaughter
by Felicity Arbuthnot
August 11, 2012
  «Veteran Russian politician Yevgeny Primakov is under no illusions:
"Mercenaries and volunteers from other states are fighting (Assad) jointly with" violent internal forces. Most Syria opponents are nonviolent. They want peaceful conflict resolution. Washington has other ideas.
"President Obama has given a direct order to the CIA to support the Syrian opposition."
"That is flagrant interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state, which does not endanger the United States or anyone else."
"Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding militants. Turkey is giving them active support." So are other regional countries (iv.)» 
[globalresearch/Arbuthnot/rickrozoff/Primakov]

Comment: This is *not* democracies doing 'good work.'

-=*=-

Argument: What they do and what they say vastly differ; crimes attemptedly 'disguised' behind lies. Worse, their erring (economic) ideologies and utterly pig-headed pursuit of capitalist-accumulation to our, we the people's cost (<1% vs. 99%+), are leading to collectively falling wages and conditions, whilst polluting the planet's ecosphere (i.e. XS-CO2-CCC), possibly terminally.

-=*=-

Fazit: That the US/Zs regimes deploy murdering violence is all the evidence we need to prove that they really do have *shit for brains*.

The BIG question, Q: Why do the great majority, assumed to be overwhelmingly good, honest, people let the US/Zs get away with it?

-=*end*=-

^ Update, 15Aug'12; PS some logic of bad words

Lemma[2]: A simple, understandable form of logic is:

IF proposition THEN conclusion; such a statement is said to be 'well-formed' when the conclusion may actually proceed from the proposition, ELSE we may have a 'non sequitur' fallacy - obviously, to be avoided.
End lemma.

Detailed arguments:

Argument 1. IF guns, bombs THEN death and destruction.

Comment 1: This is *not* simplistic but rather extremely serious; a) death and destruction is *all* that guns and bombs etc. can do, *except* b) when waved around as a threat (= coercion) and/or worse, c) used = causing death and destruction, as a substitute for a convincing argument.

Comment 1a: Note that any use of violence implies no supportable intellectual argument = shit for brains, the main theme above.

Comment 1b: The proof is easy:

IF convincing argument THEN no need for guns, bombs etc., QED.

Comment 2: Specifically here, the US threatens the world - sometimes bits of (i.e. Syria, Iran), other times (i.e. MAD) the whole world:

IF you don't do what we order THEN guns and bombs, death and destruction.

Comment 2a: Note that threatening, as actually aggressively attacking, is illegal under international law - as it is under 'normal' common sense.

Comment 3: Specifically here, the Zs threaten the world - sometimes bits of (i.e. Palestine, all neighbours), other times (i.e. Samson) the whole world:

IF anyone attacks IL THEN guns and bombs, death and destruction.

Comment 3a: Note that IL sits on 'improperly alienated' land/property;

IF not purchased in a free and fair, voluntary transaction THEN such land/property = stolen.

Comment 3b: The proof is easy:

IF Zs properly disarmed THEN all Israelis would have to exit Palestine *UNLESS* the un-remedied crime-scene = IL were first to be fixed, see I/J/Z-plex below, and the PPS.

Comment 3c: IF IL illegitimate (I say it is, see proof) THEN a) no right to exist, let alone b) no right to defend *land/property not honestly acquired*.

Comment 4: IMHO, the above is more than necessary and sufficient to prove that the US&Z regimes have shit for brains, but in case of any lingering doubt, please consider the following:

What is it that you *don't* understand about "Thou shalt not kill?" - and don't touch things not yours.

Argument 2. IF democracy disabled THEN no mandate and no legitimacy.

Comment 1: In addition to the Jefferson-Lincoln-Bernays fail above, consider the US, UK, Aus, F & IL regimes, and the Q: What happens when 'sides' change in a two-party system? A: Not much. In the US, UK, Aus & F cases, the wars are continued = bipartisan. In the case of IL, there is no alternative on offer at all (see eternal war below); when the electorate is not offered any viable option, that's un- & anti-democratic = democracy-fail.

Comment 2: The next democracy-fail is when the so-called 'representatives' execute policies *against* the interests of the electorate, here I'm thinking 'neoliberalism' (see above, below.)

Comment 3: Democracy-summary; deceived and/or non-consulted electorates, inadequate choices on representatives and especially policies, representatives who go on to *mis*represent electorates = *total* failure of democracy. We are lucky where free-speech still exists, but that is pretty useless when ignored = almost all the time.

Comment 4: IF no mandate and no legitimacy THEN no valid law. In addition, only just law may earn respect; IF no valid law THEN any/all wars are *illegitimately* ordered; the order-givers should be brought to justice.

-=*=-

Fazit: IF democracy disabled THEN the 'rulers' are tyrannical dictators. Since it appears that many 'representatives' are actually sell-outs, to the highest bidder = <1%, we can term our systems plutocracies. When such plutocracies rampage, murdering to steal, we term the perpetrators psychopaths and the systems kleptocracies. Then see XS-CO2-CCC.

Welcome to our charming, once jewel-like, ex-Enlightened world.

-=*=-

PPS Z-crimes (partial repeat, for completeness):

1. Before Herzl (motive = Zionism), there were few Jews in Palestine. Some Jews were able to buy in, but 'progress' was, to Jews, too slow.

2. After Jabotinsky (modus operandi), a new 'strategy' was adopted: Take Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property *by force* = the concept of eternal war was adopted.

3. Attempted immigration of Jews was continued (more modus operandi), sometimes 'illegally,' since Jews were *not* welcome, neither by the native ELO/Os nor the 'authorities.' Note that immigration = alien invasion, even if by stealth, and when attempted against opposition, is termed aggressive.

4. Exploiting the WW2 holocaust (opportunity), UNGA181 was passed, *proving* UN-corruption, since *no-one* has the right to eject natives from their homes and homelands, improperly dispossessing them on the way.

5. Mme Meir raised $50mio in the US - to buy guns (means).

6. After UNGA181 the Z-alien invaders increased their murderingly-violent attacks on the natives (terminal modus operandi), see Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin massacre - as just *one* example of *many* genocidal, ethnic-cleansing outrages, similar before, during and since (down to the 'current moment').

Comment 1: IMHO, the above is more than necessary and sufficient to prove that the Z-regime is rogue, that the IL-entity is illegitimate and guilty of both Nuremberg-class and other crimes against humanity, that IL squats on stolen land/property and the Z-invaders, their heirs and successors should either a) make an acceptable peace-deal with the ELO/Os = see 'remedy' below, or b) exit Palestine.

Comment 2: That IL is 'allowed' to continue in its criminal ways is an indictment of the whole 'world community.'

Comment 3: That the above Z-story is *not* hammered by the MSM+PFBCs is proof of their perfidy (just one of many) = MSM+PFBCs prove themselves to be corrupt&venal.

[«back»]

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [POD]

[2] lemma
noun (PL. lemmas or lemmata ) 1 a subsidiary or intermediate theorem in an argument or proof. [The NEW OXFORD Dictionary OF ENGLISH]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament), 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe