IF a vote is forged THEN why not a sackful?

.. easy-peasy ...

  .. forge 5% for Le Pen ...

    .. then 'hop' the lot to Sarko

Thesis/Subtitle: Democracy ain't what it's made out to be; can the people ever be trusted to vote the way our (tyrannical) rulers might like us to? Tip: Unlikely, if we're being lied to - which is pretty-well all the time ("All politicians lie!") Or perhaps that's why; they try to lie us into a trap. Lies are deployed to deceive; after enough lies it would be no surprise if we the people hardly know Arthur from Martha.

  [update, 14:41]

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Sarkozy's hopes fade with first-round loss
AM
By Europe correspondent Philip Williams, wires
Posted April 23, 2012 05:53:55 | Updated April 23, 2012 11:50:12
  «Socialist candidate Francois Hollande defeats Nicolas Sarkozy in the first round of France's presidential elections, but the big shock is a strong showing for far-right candidate Marine Le Pen.
Topics:world-politics, france» 
[AusBC/'news']

Comment: Le Pen got more votes than anyone bargained for, "the big shock" may be a CIA set-up; read on ...

-=*=-

Sarkozy is America's friend - so much so, that he 'jumped the gun' on the US/F+UK/NATO rapine = plunder by murdering-theft of Libya. But opinion polls indicate that Sarko l’Americain may lose.

Q: What's the poor CIA to do?

A: Try rigging the election.

We'll see. Marine Le Pen is set to recommend that her supporters stay home, next round. Some 'leakage' is to be expected, but how much would be 'plausibly deniable?

-=*end*=-

^ Update, 14:41: PS There are reasons = evidence, to back up my ~5% claim:

Evidence article 1:

French election frontrunners trade jibes on economy
Nicolas Sarkozy says only he has the experience to protect France but François Hollande blames him for financial woes
15.05 BST on Friday 20 April 2012. It was last modified at 00.09 BST on Saturday 21 April 2012.
  «• Abstentionism could be a factor. A poll for Le Parisien by BVA (Brulé Ville et Associés) warned it could be 24%, far higher than for the last presidential election.» 
[guardian/'news']

Comment; Q: Are private polling companies to be trusted? (Tip: Their main if not only 'duty' is to make their (already fat-cat) shareholders richer.) But such is all we ever get.

Evidence article 2:

France votes as Sarkozy faces defeat after one term
Millions of French voters turned out Sunday for the first round of a presidential poll that is expected to see the left oust Nicolas Sarkozy after only one turbulent term in office.
Sapa-AFP 2012-04-22 12:20:07
  «An average of the last eight polls released ahead of the end of first round campaign at midnight on Friday showed Hollande winning the first round with an average of 28 percent support, against 26.4 percent for Sarkozy. Far-right candidate Marine Le Pen was third with an average of 15.75 percent, followed by Communist-backed Jean-Luc Melenchon of the Left Front with 13.75 percent and centrist Francois Bayrou with 10.1 percent.» 
[timeslive(za)/'news']

Comment: Note that S & H scored about as predicted, but Le Pen is said to be up by some ~5%...

Evidence article 3:

22 April 2012 Last updated at 16:12 GMT
High turnout in French presidential election
  «Officials said 70% of people had voted by late afternoon - only slightly down from the exceptional results recorded in the last poll in 2007.» 
[bbc/'news']

Comment 1: 2007 was already regarded as 'exceptional,' now it's up around ~80% - even *more* exceptional, considering : "What's noticeable is the lack of enthusiasm for either of the main candidates." [bbc, ibid.].

Comment 2: 80% is 5% more than the estimated 75%, and Le Pen is up by ~5%.

Comment 3: Adds up? Plenty of 'space' for a ~5% fudge-factor = ballot-box stuffing = electoral fraud - eh?

(Tip: For murderers-for-spoil (latest F+UK/NATO in Libya, say, ballot-box stuffing would be naught but a peccadillo.))

[«back»]

the I/J/Z-plex illegit-morality threatens us all

.. it's ...

  .. a bit ...

    .. ordinary
 
[update, 15:51, [m-u]@17:51]

The very fact that Israel (= IL) exists at all proves that 'international law' is an unjust farce, and claiming that 'UNGA resolutions are not legally binding' is some (lying) hasbarah which illustrates both the blatant dishonesty and breathless hypocrisy of the Zionists (= Zs) at a single stroke, since a) they claim that UNGA181[1] gave the 'green-light' for IL's establishment (UNGAs = good), but then having promised to abide by UNGA181 and UNGA194 in order to be recognised in UNGA273, b) IL proceeds to defy all three and more (UNGAs = bad). In addition, IL ignores the UN at its whim[5], and when ignoring is not enough, calls on IL's 'wicked godfather' = the US to veto in the UNSC. UNSC242's preamble refers to the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war," yet the Z-trolls continue to claim that IL won territory by war, showing the Z-trolls' own particular brand of ignorance plus more dishonesty and hypocrisy, looping. One may combine IL, Jews (= Js) and Zs to form the I/J/Z-plex; the continued lies, cheating, theft and murder in and around IL reflects on the I/J/Z-plex as a group *and* on every individual in that group (excepting only those who resist the crimes/corruption to the maximum of their individual abilities), on the principle that things can only ever change for the better when some effective majority decides on reform.

Wikipedia ("the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit") is self-admittedly corrupt - since they depend on 'what someone said' (= publications they themselves deem 'authoritative') vs. the actual facts which may differ, and is therefore useless on exactly the topics where it matters most, here calling the 'conflict' in Palestine pre- and post- '47/48 (= continuing) a 'civil war,' when on one side were (& still are) the defending ELO/Os (= erstwhile legal owner/occupiers) and on the other, attacking side were the mostly newly-arrived Zs (often 'illegal' immigrants), making the 'conflict' an aggressive invasion = Nuremberg-class crime. The proof of (pre-meditated; see Jabotinsky) aggression being seen latest with Plan Dalet (Deir Yassin massacre + similar down through the years, right to the present moment.)

Consider 'A fair exchange is no robbery;' it is *obvious* that IL has *no* right to *any* Palestinian land/property, *excepting* the tiny amount that the Zs managed to purchase *before* the Zs went rogue and started to steal land/property by murdering force.

At any crime-scene, one examines 'means, motive, and opportunity,' modus operandi (= m.o.) plus 'cui bono?' The Z-motive was formalised latest by Herzl in 1897 (1st Zionist Congress), the m.o. developed by Jabotinsky[2] in 1923 ("Iron Wall"), the means partly provided by Meir ($US50mio for arms), the opportunity = cynical exploitation of WW2 ('holocaust') and as for cui bono? - we can all see, not 'just' the Zs but the whole I/J/Z-plex *and* the US rogue-regime, in its 'interference' in the ME to steal oil (more exactly, to rip-off the economic rent there-from, plus control (= hegemony) to 'challenge' Russia & China, say.)

[m-u] Returning to the aggressive-invasion crime-scene, it most resembles a burglary/home-invasion, whereby the correct response is to send in SWAT-teams to arrest the perpetrators and bring them to justice = try then imprison them, after which the crime-scene is returned to the legitimate owner/occupiers (see UNGA194, "right of return") = all stolen land/property to revest - or acceptable recompense/reparations, plus a sincere "Sorry!" - my proposed, as uniquely possible, *just* peace-plan. The UN never had any right to even suggest the ejection of rightful ELO/Os, and wrongs (= ghastly crimes) must be remedied. The area concerned could be declared a (demilitarised, A-weapon-free) non-state world-heritage reserve, a 'mecca' for all interested parties. That would be a peace to 'believe' in – (belief being what many do in the absence of, or even contrary to - evidence. Haw.) [end m-u]

Amongst other things, force is the resort of the 'mentally-challenged' (= handicapped if not outright psychopathic); lose the argument, kill the opponent? Hardly legal, let alone moral - and so the rogue Zs(+US) ignore/manipulate 'international law' to suit themselves.

Fazit: The absolute key is the status of Palestinian land/property[3]; it has been improperly alienated[4] (= stolen) by people-not-from-there (= invading Zionists), and the I/J/Z-plex loudly shouts lies (= hasbarah) in an attempt to conceal the cheating (manipulation of the UN) and theft by murdering force. This reflects *badly* on every non-objecting I/J/Z-plex member = most Js.

To dispel any remaining doubts, try looking here. That makes them the ultimate suicide-bomber/blackmailers.

Some proof - of Samson, or some analogue; google (without the {}): {Israel "would be prepared to take the region and even the whole world down with it" golda meir} [Meir to Hart, '71]

Her response (About 335 results, time of writing): "Golda replied, “Yes, that’s exactly what I am saying.“"

Extending the threat (About 28,700 results): "We possess several hundred atomic warheads ... Most European capitals are targets for our air force." [Creveld to Hirst, '03]

-=*end*=-

PS Note that only just law may earn respect - and that there can never be peace without justice.

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] UNGA181 contains "The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date ..."

Comment: This clearly specifies 'ethnic cleansing' = illegal/immoral, and invalidates UNGA181 as a whole; the dispossession was subsequently carried out via the genocidal terrorism of the invading Zs, see Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin etc..

[2] Jabotinsky [my comments]: “No native population would stomach the intrusion of another nation into their territory. So the gloves have to be off [= rogue; if nothing else, this implies no respecting of law]. Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer to Arab objections to Zionist control of the territory.” [= perpetual war - just what we can observe.]

[3] Property (or owndom) is any physical or intangible entity that is owned by a person or jointly by a group of people or a legal entity like a corporation.[citation needed] Depending on the nature of the property, an owner of property has the right to consume, sell, rent, mortgage, transfer, exchange or destroy it, or to exclude others from doing these things.

[4] Alienation, in property law, is the capacity for a piece of property or a property right to be sold or otherwise transferred from one party to another. Although property is generally deemed to be alienable, it may be subject to restraints on alienation.
Aboriginal title is one example of inalienability (save to The Crown) in common law jurisdictions.

Note: "Save to The Crown" illustrates our 'sovereign problem' whereby 'regimes' (and their militaries) declare themselves different to 'us, we the people.' Following 'just law,' only laws/actions desired and properly acceded to by we the *sovereign* voters can have legitimacy/force; WHEN "All politicians lie!" (most seem to) THEN they are deceiving the electorate AND thus lose any remit.

No remit -> no law -> no taxation & NO MORE WAR!

-=*=-
^
[5] Update, 15:51; PPS ... It's utterly *stupefying*, how *bad* = immoral, criminal, the Zs were and are, shamefully *not* prevented from being; an extract (long) from a recent article (thnx):

Ron Paul’s Position on Israel is a Betrayal of His Values
by Jeremy R. Hammond
April 14, 2012
  «... The truth is that following the Zionists’ unilateral declaration of the existence of the state of Israel in May 1948, [key ->] an act prejudicial to the rights of the majority inhabitants and for which there was absolutely no legal basis [<- key], Palestine was ethnically cleansed. More than 700,000 Arab Palestinians were expelled or fled from their homes, never allowed to return. The Zionist forces captured Jerusalem, and when an armistice was finally reached in 1949, Israel controlled the west and Jordan the east of the city.

In 1967, Israel invaded and occupied the West Bank and claimed to annex East Jerusalem. Subsequently, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution 242, which emphasized “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasized that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and called for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

In May 1968, the Security Council passed resolution 252, which declared Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid” and called upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

In July 1969, the Security Council passed resolution 267, noting that Israel had since “taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”. It reaffirmed “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible” and deplored Israel’s further violations of U.N. resolutions, censured “in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, and confirmed “that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently called on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Security Council 271 of September 1969 again reaffirmed the principle of the inadmissibility under international law of the acquisition of territory by war, describing Jerusalem as being under “military occupation” by Israel and condemning Israel’s continued violation of previous resolutions.

Resolution 298 of September 1971 again reaffirmed the principle, deplored Israel’s continued violation of U.N. resolutions, and confirmed that Israel’s attempts to annex Jerusalem “are totally invalid”.

Resolution 446 of March 1979 affirmed “once more that the Fourth Geneva Convention ... is applicable to the Arab territories occupied by Israel, including Jerusalem“, determined “that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity” (emphasis added).

Resolution 452 of July 1979 again deplored Israel’s continued violation of Security Council resolutions and again emphasized that Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “has no legal validity and constitutes a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention”. It again also noted that Jerusalem is included in “the occupied Arab territories”.

Resolution 465 of March 1980 again condemned Israel’s settlement policy, which violates the Fourth Geneva Convention and U.N. Security Council resolutions, and again reaffirmed that Israel’s annexation attempts “have no legal validity” and constitutes “a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention”.

Resolution 471 of June 1980 once again reaffirmed the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention “to the Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem“, and once again called upon Israel to end its illegal occupation of those territories, including Jerusalem.

Resolution 476 of June 1980 again deplored Israel’s continued violation of international law and reaffirmed “the overriding necessity to end the prolonged occupation of Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem”, and reaffirmed Israel’s annexation measures “have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention” and were “null and void”.

Resolution 478 of August 1980 again censured Israel’s continued violation of international law and again reaffirmed that its annexation attempts were “null and void”.

Resolutions 592 of December 1986, 605 of December 1987, 607 of January 1988, 636 of July 1989, 694 of May 1991, 726 of January 1992, 799 of December 1992 all again reaffirmed the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to occupied Arab territory, including Jerusalem.

In July 2004, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel’s decision to build a wall in the West Bank, including Jerusalem, which concluded that “all these territories (including East Jerusalem) remain occupied territories and that Israel has continued to have the status of occupying Power”, that the construction of the wall in those territories is “illegal”, and that Israel’s settlements in the West Bank, including Jerusalem, similarly “have been established in breach of international law.”

...

One must keep in mind that of the candidates, Ron Paul is also the only one who has said he would cut off all foreign aid, including the $3 billion plus given annually to Israel. This is not trivial, given the fact that [key ->] without U.S. support, Israel’s criminal policies against the Palestinians could not continue [<- key].» 
[foreignpolicyjournal/Hammond]

Comment: What I said.

[«back»]

secrecy = hiding facts = lying by com- & o-mission - deceit damages democracy

.. ignorance ...

  .. is *no* ...

    .. excuse

Thesis/Subtitle: Pay strict attention to what they do, suspect everything that they say. 'They' are the tyrants who rule over us; deceit not only damages democracy, it disables it. When democracy is disabled, the 'representatives' lose their remit & all ruler-actions & their imposed-laws lose all legitimacy.

Corollary: IF criminals did not lie (by omission or commission) THEN they would convict themselves; lies[1] are deployed to deceive and no honourable person nor legitimate project needs any part of such deceit[2], ERGO lies are the necessary & sufficient 'entry-point' to criminal intentions and any resulting criminal actions.
 
[update 120417, 11:21]

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Is it worth it? Former commander wrestles with Afghan war
AM
By Geoff Thompson
Updated April 16, 2012 11:38:48
  «And he [Cantwell] has told Four Corners that at its heart, Australia's presence in Afghanistan is about supporting the ANZUS defence treaty with the United States.
"At the level of the soldier and their families, you have to say, is it worth it? I as a commander asked myself that question many times, and I really, really struggle with it," he said.
"The only way I can see through this, so that I can sleep at night, is to differentiate, to say it's not worth it for the lives that you lose.
"You could never look at any soldier, sailor or airman and say 'Your life's forfeit for some political purpose'. That's just unacceptable.
"But at the highest level of strategy, and in the dirty ugly world of international relationships, where it's you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours, that those lives become less important, and taking that longer term view, that hard-nosed, realpolitik view, that politicians do, and must, it's worth it.
"But not at the human level."» 
[AusBC/'news']

Comment 1: Note the keywords:

'The hard-nosed, realpolitik view vs. the human level - it's worth it.'

Objection: We the people live "at the human level." 'Realpolitik' concerns itself with criminal rip-offs & other inhumanities - why/how else could it possibly differ from "at the human level?"

Here's another "worth it:" ½mio dead Iraqi children, thanks, but "No, thanks!" - to Mme Albright. Deaths attributed to US actions and aftermath in Iraq alone since 1991 could well exceed ~3mio, with a further ~2mio internally displaced & ~2mio outright fled since 2003. So much for 'responsibility to protect.'

^
Update 120417, 11:21;

Comment 1a: There is a world of evil 'hiding' behind the term 'realpolitik', and Cantwell tells us outright lies with his "where it's you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours," since realpolitik has as its basis sheer, bloody-minded thuggery - on a breath-takingly criminal scale = millions of innocent people murdered for spoil. One of the ghastly z-trolls infecting forums wrote that no-one is 'chosen' as 'leader' unless the chosen is known to be prepared to 'pull the trigger' = order murders. Q: How would this troll know? More importantly, Q: Who would do this choosing, and how would any such assurance be obtained? A: "Get a briefing (from the CIA/Mossad/ASIO)?" Q: Who are the true tyrants pulling the strings of the 'public' tyrants = our visible (corrupt, traitorous) politicians? All good questions - buried behind vile, immoral, democracy-defiling secrecy; looping.

Proof of the criminal thuggery is everywhere, from the dual war crimes at Hiroshima and Nagasaki through the imposition of Israel on the hapless Palestinians (burglary/home-invasion analogy), right down to the recent rapine = plundering of Libya, current attacks on Syria = all un-remedied crime-sites. All, also (at least since UNGA181 = 29Nov'47), proof of UN corruption. Where are the decent people, those who might exercise effective countervailing power on the side of truth & justice?

[«back»]

Comment 2: Almost if not all aggressive action in the ME harks back to resources = murdering to steal oil (mainly US but also F+UK), then land/property (the US' illegitimate sprog = IL = Zs), plus US/Z hegemony, whereby the US/Zs try to impose their grubby, greedy, rip-off = criminal will on others (not full list; 1897+ Palestine-area, 1947+ Palestine-area outwards, 1953 Iran, 1991 Iraq, 2001 Afghanistan, 2003 Iraq again, 2011 Libya, currently Syria, next Iran again, perhaps Pakistan and eventually Russia & China). Nothing else makes any sense; the 'bombing/killing to free/save/democratize' nonsense is just that.

Comment 3: IF the UN 'worked as designed' THEN no alliances would be needed, since war would have been eliminated - the UN's original remit. BUT: The UN has been corrupted, latest with UNGA181 - see below. For further proof if needed, see the UN currently working hand-in-glove with the murdering-to-steal US/F+UK/NATO/Zs. Disgustingly criminal, the whole lot.

-=*=-

Discussion:

Is it worth it? - I ask you.

Case#1: Consider the cops. Back in the anti-Vietnam war rallies, *some* cops behaved viciously - attacking 'their own people;' an *alleged* infringement for which Muammar Gaddafi was attacked by US/F+UK/NATO and eventually murdered, and Libya reduced to a smouldering, sewage running in the street, dark = destroyed electricity system, buildings demolished ruin à la Iraq. But also somewhere around about 'back then,' English bobbies patrolled the streets armed with little more than a smile and a whistle. Look now, at our cops = militarised pigs - for that's what they are, both in Aus & elsewhere. Q: Why do we need militarised pigs as cops? A: Feared (more than actual) terrorism. Not coincidentally, the alien, often illegal immigrant = invading Zionists are said to have 'invented' modern terrorism, which the US then passed on to al-Qaeda in order to inflict maximum pain on the Soviets in Afghanistan 1979-1989. Now 'Arab/Islamic' terrorism has 'gone viral' and threatens us all (mainly Anglo/Judaics, but EU and others too) in our 'homelands' (each of US, Aus + IL occupies land improperly alienated from the local ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers). The major difference is that not hundreds but only ~65 years ago, IL was 'gifted' Palestinian land by UNGA181: "... to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date ..." Note that "shall be evacuated" = ethnic cleansing (subsequently carried out by Zionist terrorists in incidents like the Deir Yassin massacre - outrages never since stopped = ongoing, vile crimes.) Note also Jabotinsky [my comments]: “No native population would stomach the intrusion of another nation into their territory. So the gloves have to be off [= rogue; if nothing else, this implies no respecting of law]. Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer to Arab objections to Zionist control of the territory.” [= perpetual war]

Comment: By rights, the Zs have *NO* rights in Palestine; no 'right to exist' (individuals sure, but Israel not) and even less 'right to defend;' here consider the 'burglary/home-invasion' analogy; correct response is to send in SWAT teams, arrest then imprison the perpetrators & return the crime-site to the hapless ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers (all stolen land/property to revest).

Case#2: Consider the economic sphere. To cut a looong story short, the acceleration of the rich getting ever more obscenely richer, at our, we the people's cost (= getting relatively poorer), has been enabled by our very own 'representatives' = ruthless, tyrannical rulers' introduction of all things 'neoliberal.' Representatives are *supposed* to implement the will of the majority, protecting minorities. Yet our rulers a) lie to us, b) abuse us ("A mob!") and c) as well as neoliberalize the place, send 'our boys' off to (murdering to steal) war on another country's whim (see trigger article).

Case#3: Consider the 'climate problem' = xs-CO2-c4; decoded = excess CO2 caused climate-change catastrophe - *no* government anywhere is taking effective action to drag atmospheric CO2 concentrations down to a safe (~300ppm) level. This latter crime by rulers may end life as we would prefer to live it upon our once jewel-like planet, turning our comfortable-life supporting ecosphere into a raging nightmare where 'business as usual' just can't be.

-=*=-

Fazit: Not good enough (massive understatement.)

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English][POD]

[2] deceit  n. 1 deception, esp. by concealing the truth. 2 dishonest trick. [Latin capio take] [ibid.]
 

life spirals down death of decency 'not my job, man!'

Thesis/Subtitle: Our once jewel-like planet is being plundered by criminals and poisoned by pollution, including xs-CO2-c4; decoded = excess CO2 caused climate-change catastrophe, but it's all 'business as usual' = rich getting richer and the rest being neoliberalised into serfdom and austeritied into poverty - why?

-=*=-

Well brought-up children learn not to lie, and certainly no cheating, theft or murder.

Even better brought-up children learn to share their toys, and not to touch things-not-theirs. Often heard in kindergarten: "Do not hit!"

Thus children are socialised and educated beyond what parents have been able to do (TV or electronics as baby-sitters); to point the children at 'polite society' = minimal aggression against their fellows (but more importantly, no aggro towards their 'betters'), oriented towards 'useful' employment (but see rich->richer below), and possibly lured into 'defence' forces, to 'serve the nation.'

So what goes wrong?

The US bombs and/or invades at the drop of a hat = murder for spoil. They cheat the world with their reserve-currency, deficits & printing = conjuring otherwise worthless fiat currency out of thin air on their computer keyboards - needed by others to buy oil (which is burnt, requiring non-US people to 'earn' ever more otherwise worthless US$s by making 'stuff' which is sold to US consumers; looping.)

The alien/invading Zs have stolen an entire country (erstwhile Palestine) at the point of guns, bombs etc. = Nuremberg-class offences by Zs & US both.

The military, charged with 'defence' actually performs the murdering-to-thieve = rapine, enabling plunder.

The (corrupt&venal) MSM conduits and *actively assists* lying propaganda; no war may be fought in the face of public disapproval, so consent (or perhaps better: Resigned acceptance) is 'manufactured' via PR campaigns, see 'lying' again (looping).

Unis, once home to intellectuals, are now partly/wholly 'privatised' = forced to 'make their own way' both by charging students and by professors&Co having to produce to order, hence neoliberal = voodoo economics, psychologists who tailor torture programs and design the manipulative propaganda ("Viagra-taking govt. paid African (= black-skinned) mercenaries raping school-girls in Libya!" - Lying propaganda *designed* to evoke emotions, switching off rational thought & invoking outrage amongst the gullible, ppp-dd'd electorate.)

Terminology: The pushed-propaganda paradigm applied to the electorate produces dumbed-down voters = ppp-dd'd.

The sheople vegetate at home watching their wide-flat TVs and often eating take-away pizza (bread&circusses); effectively frittering their lives away on trivial sport and worse, on psychologically damaging 'movies' etc. (vast amounts of violence, meanness & outright idiocy) - interspersed with 'news' that distorts if not deliberately lies about events (govt. snipers on roof-tops, say = impossible for any govt., certainly for one under threat of US-aggression (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran; all with more or less oil, all 'threats' to the illegitimate Israel squatting on improperly alienated = stolen land/property)).

No surprise, but the rich get ever filthily richer = <1% obscenely fat-cat 'movers&shakers' = true (string-pulling) rulers who control our 'representatives' = destroying democracy (assuming such ever worked properly; perhaps, even most likely never - the people can't be trusted to vote in some ruler-desired way, don't you know?)

-=*=-

This is 'life spiralling down;' we, the people's higher aspirations and ideals colliding with the vicious crimes of our so-called 'betters,' we have to work ever harder for ever less (= so-called 'productivity gains') while 'they' get ever richer & more extravagant = just can't spend their ill-gotten, rip-off gains, they're raking-off so much.

In addition, our democracy is destroyed, i.e. it's made a total sham; with (crooked = non-) representation, the 'leaders' make themselves into tyrants and taxation without proper representation becomes utter and outright theft. Proof is 1) the ppp-dd'd cannot make informed votes, 2) no representative can effectively implement the will of the majority because 'party-platforms' make that mathematically impossible (and the candidates don't care about that anyway - they do what they want to do = by definition non-representative), and 3) the reps sell-out to the string-pullers anyway (by far the worst and that by a long-chalk, the Z-lobby.) Then there's bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic support for US-wars, neoliberalism, war-on-drugs, say. Proof: Bipartisan = *no* choice for the voter; no choice = dead democracy.

This all leads to the 'death of decency;' on any bell-curve one has extremes around the average, here the dumbed-down on one side, the cleverer ones on the other. One can imagine the ppp-dd'd giving up then saying:

  .. "Not my job, man!"

But what of the cleverer ones? Are they all crooks? Not me, and I thought I'd find some 'friends' to form an effective opposition = countervailing movement - to imprison the crooks and save our planet - but no-one shows up. Why not?

incompetent and/or corrupt - both and worse

.. both lies ...

  .. and secrecy ...

    .. cripple democracy

Thesis/Subtitle: A national = publicly financed broadcaster's function is to inform the electorate. Any failure to do so makes a properly functioning democracy impossible.

Corollary: A pushed-propaganda paradigm dumbed-down (ppp-dd'd) populace cannot vote in a properly informed way, thus producing the very result assumed as the basis for misinforming the electorate in the first place.

Illustration: Oh, they won't vote the way we want them to, so we'll trick them into it ... by telling them a few well-chosen 'little whites' (= lies. Note that lies are deployed to deceive).

Q: How fair is that?

-=*=-

Forewarned is forearmed; the following is a bit circuitous = it is not simple.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

Syrian rebels accused of human rights abuses
Updated March 21, 2012 12:59:34
  «A rights group has accused elements of Syria's opposition of carrying out serious human rights abuses, including kidnapping, torture and execution.» 
[AusBC/'news' rebels' abuses]

Comment; note the source: "A rights group has accused ..."

Trigger article 2:

Families shot dead while fleeing Syria
By Middle East correspondent Anne Barker, staff
Posted March 23, 2012 08:24:22
  «Two families have been shot dead in Syria as they fled the north-western province of Idlib in a bus, trying to reach the border with Turkey.
Opposition supporters in Syria say the two families were near the town of Sermin, close to the Turkish border, when Syrian forces opened fire.» 
[AusBC/'news' Families dead]

Comment; note the source: "Opposition supporters in Syria say ..."

More from article 1:

  «Reports from Syria cannot be independently verified because authorities have barred access to rights groups and journalists.» 
[AusBC/'news' rebels' abuses, ibid.]

Comment: In the absence of independent verification, the AusBC's implication is: "Trust us."

Q: Why should we? Does the AusBC have any 'form' as far as reporting truthfully?

Consider these four searches:

1) Google {Israel "right to exist" site:abc.net.au} (without the {}s):
About 1,090 results

2) Google {Israel "right to defend" site:abc.net.au} (without the {}s):
About 2,000 results

3) Google {Palestine OR Palestinian "right of return" site:abc.net.au} (without the {}s):
About 433 results

4) Google {Israel OR Palestine "peace process" "Anne Barker" site:abc.net.au} (without the {}s):
About 149 results

The searches themselves prove little, but do show the AusBC's awareness of the issues, illustrate what's wrong with the pushed-propaganda paradigm (i.e. how it differs from the just-world we *should* be living in, but obviously are not).

Q: Why? Does the AusBC have anything to do with tolerating injustice?

A: Yes, IF (= when) they misreport (= lie of commission), or fail to report (= lie of omission = promulgate some 'secret'), THEN the AusBC maintains the population in a state of false or incomplete information.

Argument: It is easy enough to prove some 'inconvenient truths' about the above four searches:

1) Israel has *no* "right to exist;"

1a) UNGA181 contains "The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date ..."

Comment: This clearly specifies 'ethnic cleansing' = 'not on' and invalidates UNGA181 as a whole.

1b) Even if UNGA181 is regarded as 'inoperable,' the invading Zionists (most were newly immigrated) then performed just that 'ethnic cleansing' by genocidal attacks [Deir Yassin and all analogues then and since] on the mostly Palestinian ELO/Os (hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers) = even less 'on.'

Note: As recent immigrants, the war by Zionists against the ELO/Os was *not* of a civil war nature but *was* of the nature of an aggressive invasion (Nuremberg; hang perpetrators).

The 'upshot' of a & b is that Israel squats on improperly alienated land/property = no right to exist, QED.

Note 1: *All else* after this un-remedied 'establishment-crime' cannot change the fact that Israel is an illegitimate entity. Proof: Burglar/home-invaders are (under just law) prosecuted then imprisoned, *not* allowed to self-declare independence let alone occupy and live on in an enduring crime-scene.

Note 2: What *could* change (= improve) Israel's status would be remedial RoR+RaR = honour the ELO/Os' right of return plus all improperly alienated land/property to revest and with acceptable reparations where applicable. Obviously, no peace is ever possible without justice.

Note 3: Wishing/hoping for some 'peace-settlement' with ELO/Os whereby those ELO/Os surrender their rights (to their land/property or right of return to same, say) is at least doubly fallacious: a) 'agreements' signed under duress are never valid & b) the ELO/Os would be truly mad if they did.

2) Following no "right to exist," Israel has *no* "right to defend" anything (but of course, individual Israelis have rights just like any other person on the planet, just not on stolen land/property.)

3) Palestinians *do* have the "right of return," as specified in UNGA194. In addition, UNGA181 specified that Palestine be partitioned into two states, one Palestinian. UNGA273 'recognised' Israel as a state, on condition (amongst others) of Israel accepting (= honouring) 181 & 194. Nearly 63 years 'down the track,' there is still no Palestinian state, and the 'ethnically cleansed' Palestinians are still dispossessed/locked out of their land/property. Another QED on Israel as an illegitimate entity.

4) Jabotinsky: “No native population would stomach the intrusion of another nation into their territory. So the gloves have to be off [= rogue; if nothing else, this implies no respecting of law]. Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer to Arab objections to Zionist control of the territory.” [= perpetual war]

Comment 1: Jabotinsky wrote the above circa 1923. Under that long-known circumstance (or deliberately suppressed/ignored?), *no* "peace process" can ever be expected to yield any positive result [proof is continued Israeli expansion into land-not-theirs]; to write about any such peace process is sheer humbug = more deliberate and grave misinformation. QED on Barker as propagandiste.

Comment 2: Points 1-4 above are more or less the results of my own research, IF the AusBC ever reported them THEN (a) never in my recollection and (b) they have long since forgotten them, as their current 'narratives' show. QED on AusBC as propagandist.

-=*=-

Fazit: As Fraser may or may not have said: "Life wasn't meant to be easy" (neither was my circuitous route) and someone else is reputed to have said "The truth will set you free." With the AusBC & Barker's form = proven loss of credibility, they can't be trusted to properly inform us. So, back to Syria. You, dear reader, will no doubt make your own assessment; I merely ask: Is it credible of a state-leader like Assad, under massive pressure ("We're going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, ..." with Libya'11 as 'entrée') - to set snipers onto innocent civilians, or shoot "two families ... dead in Syria as they fled the north-western province of Idlib in a bus, trying to reach the border with Turkey?"

My tip: When dealing with rogue-regime/entities (US/Zs, run-of-the-mill terrorists, alien invaders et al., say), listen not to what they say but watch closely as to what they do.

We are still waiting for the truth, that which is supposed to set us free; how much longer, Aunty?

-=*=-

PS (Added as a mini-update, 3:43am): Google has stuffed-up the indexing of this blog. Just like the AusBC, they appear to be either incompetent and/or corrupt = are not 'honest brokers' ... proof = WYSIWYG.

who can we trust - to tell us the truth? (AusBC vs. Syria/Assad)

 
[update, 13Mar'12 (sub-section added; minor changes (red font))]

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Snipers bring terror to Syrian streets
Updated March 01, 2012 11:27:59
  «Every sunrise over Idlib sets off a deadly soundtrack - the crack of snipers' bullets that hail down from roofs and hillsides and kill indiscriminately.
The locals of the northern Syrian city have become grimly familiar with their unseen enemies - called qanas, the Arabic name for snipers - whose bullets cut through the air long after nightfall, often until midnight.
Their victims seem chosen at random. During the two weeks I just spent there, I witnessed the funerals of three children who were shot on Idlib's streets in broad daylight.» 
[AusBC/AFP]

Comment: Of course, IF Assad was shooting his own innocent citizens dead by random sniper-fire, THEN he certainly would be a vile monster. BUT: That's a known and well-used propaganda technique called 'demonisation.' The US deployed similar 'stories' in 1991 against Saddam (babies dumped out of incubators), again in 2003 (people-shredders, mobile bio-labs, non-existent WMDs) and then US-proxies F+UK/NATO ditto in Libya recently. Recall that 'belief' is mainly done in the absence of evidence, and there is every reason to suspect the AusBC/AFP article contains whopping lies presented as 'evidence' by a possibly self-interested and self-involved journo - an example of the 4th-estate conduiting and actively assisting lying propaganda.

Q: With 'the West' breathing down Assad's neck, how realistic would it be for him to deliberately paint himself as a random-murdering tyrant? Especially since the same type of 'narrative' was deployed against Gaddafi? Recall the story of Viagra-assisted mass-rapes? Same m.o., same conduit = corrupt&venal MSM + AusBC, same type of lies. Lies with 'impact;' lies designed to shock people into revulsion. Recall "Why, of course, the people don't want war... [but] it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, ..."

-=*=-

^
Update, 13Mar'12, 10:21:

Consider: "Public support is a critical aspect of military action ..."

Contrast that with "It is always a simple matter to drag the people along, ..."

IF we are lied to (vis-à-vis war, say), THEN we can never offer *properly informed* support. No properly won public support means any resulting actions by rulers (US-led attack on Iraq, say, or US/F+UK/NATO rape of Libya etc.) - are undemocratic, and therefore without the permission extended by the sovereign-voters (= we, the people) - which in turn are offences against us, truth & justice.

A prime-propaganda technique is "the big Lie," try this google-search (at time of writing about 221 results) - a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously." (Proof: From Obama 'down,' current official US view is that Iran is *not* building a bomb, let alone wants one.)

It's easy enough to prove that the US-led smashing of Iraq (100s of 1000s dead, if not 1.4mio+) was illegal; even Kofi Annan said so: then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal." (About 72,100 results)

I could go on... but time is fleeting. Try this, vis-à-vis the current 'Western' (by proxy, mercenary invaders, whatever) attack on Syria:

Middle East
Mar 9, 2012
Syria: Straining credulity?
By Alastair Crooke
  « ... for "we are already masters of information warfare ... Hollywood is 'preparing the battlefield' ... Information destroys traditional jobs and traditional cultures; it seduces, betrays, yet remains invulnerable. How can you [possibly] counterattack the information [warfare] others have turned upon you?
"Our sophistication in handling it will enable us to outlast and outperform all hierarchical cultures ... Societies that fear or otherwise cannot manage the flow of information simply will not be competitive. They might master the technological wherewithal to watch the videos, but we will be writing the scripts, producing them, and collecting the royalties. Our creativity is devastating."» 
[atimes/Crooke]

Comment: as usual, you should read it all. Some links at end of article are not well done; I intend to 'correct' them in a new comment below.

Then: "No war crimes regarding Iraq have even been raised or addressed by the International Court of Justice."

Comment: No court case does *not* mean not guilty, only an obviously corrupt justice system.

My point here: The US (plus snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on = SQSH-O) regimes do their dastardly deeds = murdering for spoil, in the name of democracy and oil-security, amongst other 'spurious' (= lying) excuses, when 'in truth' it's for $s, US-hegemony & Zs = both massive theft and destroying competition (Arab/Muslim Israel-neighbours, China, Iran & Russia).

None of the above are good reasons to kill&steal (there are no good reasons) - where is the effective (with good morals) opposition?

[«back»]

-=*=-

Contrast article 1:

The Saga Of Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, And Wikileaks, To Be Put To Ballad And Film
By William Blum
06 March, 2012
  «Since at least 2006 the United States has been funding political opposition groups in Syria, including a satellite TV channel that beams anti-government programming into the country.» 
[countercurrents/Blum]

-=*=-

Contrast article 2:

Stratfor Emails: Covert Special Ops Inside Syria Since December
A private conversation with Pentagon officials suggested US and allied troops were on the ground in Syria
by John Glaser, March 07, 2012
  «An analyst from Stratfor claimed in December 2011 that officials at the Pentagon clued him in on covert military operations taking place in Syria. “After a couple hours of talking, they said without saying that SOF [Special Operations Forces] teams (presumably from US, UK, France, Jordan, Turkey) are already on the ground focused on recce [reconnaissance] missions and training opposition forces,” the email said.» 
[antiwar/Glaser]

-=*=-

Contrast article 3:

The Bloody Road to Damascus: The Triple Alliance’s War on a Sovereign State
by Prof. James Petras
March 10, 2012
  «There is clear and overwhelming evidence that the uprising to overthrow President Assad of Syria is a violent, power grab led by foreign-supported fighters who have killed and wounded thousands of Syrian soldiers, police and civilians, partisans of the government and its peaceful opposition.
The outrage expressed by politicians in the West, Gulf States and in the mass media, about the ‘killing of peaceful Syrian citizens protesting in justice’ is cynically designed to cover up the documented reports of violent seizure of neighborhoods, villages and towns by armed bands, brandishing machine guns and planting road-side bombs.
The assault on Syria is backed by foreign funds, arms and training. Due to a lack of domestic support, however, to be successful, direct foreign military intervention will be necessary. For this reason a huge propaganda and diplomatic campaign has been mounted to demonize the legitimate Syrian government. The goal is to impose a puppet regime and strengthen Western imperial control in the Middle East. In the short run, this will further isolate Iran in preparation for a military attack by Israel and the US and, in the long run, it eliminates another independent secular regime friendly to China and Russia.» 
[globalresearch/Petras]

-=*=-

You may decide, but a word of caution: Bad things can happen, when good people say/do nothing.

-=*=-

PS Some 'more of the same':

  «The Western governments' and mainstream media’s narrative of a one-sided humanitarian crisis in Syria is rapidly unwinding to reveal a self-serving deception to justify a re-run of Libya-style NATO conquest. In reality, it is the Western powers and their Israeli and Arab henchmen who are fuelling a humanitarian crisis and creating the conditions for all-out war. All of which, it should be said, constitutes criminality comparable to Nazi Germany’s wars of aggression.
...
Despite the mainstream media’s self-serving smokescreen, the fact is that the Western governments have been calculating for years on the subversion of Syria from within. For the past 12 months, their plans for regime change in Damascus have gone into overdrive with clandestine, criminal military action on the ground and using Arab and Israeli proxies as conduits for weapons. The latest leak from the Pentagon’s favourite private-sector think-tank, Stratfor, is just one more proof of an already established fact on the ground. But don’t expect the Western mainstream propaganda machine, or even some of the so-called progressive media, to alter the mood music of “humanitarian crisis” in its efforts to groom the Western public to accept yet another criminal war, even when it becomes patently clear that the narrative is nonsense.
There is too much at stake for truth to be allowed to interfere. Syria is a preordained piece on the chessboard that the Western powers want to take out in their grand scheme for bolstering dominance over the oil-rich Middle East – with Iran as the next piece. The Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria... Iran sequence stretches Western government and media credibility to well beyond breaking point. Believe the “responsibility to protect” or “weapons of mass destruction” fairytale if you want. Meanwhile, in the real world Prince Charming is shafting international law and human lives by the millions.» 

Some proof: "We're going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran" (Wesley Clark, reporting a US post-9/11 boast.)

More proof: Anything Netanyahu says vis-à-vis Iran, anything the IDF does to hapless Palestinians, starting latest with Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin - and right down to 'the current moment:' "Israeli air strikes on Gaza killed 15 Palestinians, including a top militant, medics said on Saturday, ..." - recall that Israel does *not* have clear legal title to *any* of Palestine.

Even more proof: The US, F+UK/NATO have 'form' = criminal history, also right down to 'the current moment.'

how to prevent WW3

Easy.
 
[updated]

Preamble: The self-styled 'world-leader' = US accuses Arab/Muslims, if not the people themselves, but those people - of being led by vicious tyrants and/or 'mad-Mullahs.' (To the US it's all the one generic really; people not-like-them are little better than ignorant savages, to be disposed of arbitrarily.)

And so the wars since 9/11 - conquering Afghanistan (well, attempted over last 10+ years but failing, Pakistan suffering grave collateral damage), Iraq, Libya, Syria in-progress and Iran in-the-queue - are all 'sold' on a) freeing the people and so b) making the world safe for democracy and c) - most important! - Ensuring 'oil = SUV-fuel security.'

That's one view of the actions of the US, another is that all these illegal, aggressive, Nuremberg-style invasive attacks are for resources = for spoil = plundering = rapine; Afghanistan for pipeline-routes, Iraq for oil, Libya ditto + water, Syria for oil + Russia's port + one road to Tehran, continued "All options!" threatened Iran for oil + revenge, THEN add a US-hegemony overlay, also to punish recalcitrant = US-predatory-capitalism resisting regimes and finally, to 'protect' its criminal, ethnic-cleansing, genocidal, land-thieving, illegitimate side-kick = dog-wagging tail or actual master (the last two depending on how far the Z-rot has set in.)

Got all that? You decide; you probably already have - your decision may rest on how much of the pushed-propaganda paradigm you believe - or not, recalling 'belief' is mostly done in the absence of evidence. End preamble.

-=*=-

The in-progress attacks on Syria are more or less openly supported by the US; foreign elements (terrorists) crossing in to foment trouble and attack the Assad govt.. (Usual disclaimer: However much I deplore aggressive external subversion etc., it doesn't mean that I personally support (alleged!) vicious tyrants. Recall here 'choice between evils;' IMO, US+Zs are definitely the most evil, proof = see rapine etc. above, more below.)

I thought that since Russia already has a port in Syria = 'a foot in the door,' then they could be invited 'all the way in' to help defend Syria.

But then I went MAD; Russia + China could both 'donate' a few (ready-to-go, mobile-launched = shell-game) H-nukes to both Syria and Iran.

Another disclaimer: I'm not actually advocating *anyone* attacking *anyone else* - just saying. At the moment, there appears to be no effective countervailing force restraining the US/Zs and their vicious rapine; I'm proposing the immediate nuclear-arming of - in the US' own words - a few mad-Mullahs, who would not hesitate, not for the smallest part of a pico-sec, *in circumstances of being under actual attack*, to take action to *defend* themselves - thus *forestalling* any such attack... and so avoid WW3. Prevention most obviously here being better than cure.
^
Update 16:51 (from here to end) - Note also, that MAD would still be operative, since the US/Zs maintain the ability to obliterate any country on the planet, but they themselves would then be prevented from aggressive attacks on Syria and Iran = a VERY GOOD thing. Confirmation: At least one credible Israeli official has said: a nuclear-armed Iran does not necessarily pose an existential threat to the Jewish state.

See? - Easy.

PS Make no mistake; no-one should be naïve about this, nor persist in any level of ignorance - let alone believe the US/Z lies, brought to us via *and actively assisted by* the corrupt&venal MSM (sadly incl. 'our' AusBC). The US/Zs have form = murdering for spoil, one 'let itself loose' on the world latest 6Aug'45 and the other latest 29Nov'47. The Zs continue to threaten their neighbours (and the world, see "Samson option" below [*]), and US' presumed end-game is to subjugate both Russia & China - neither of which(whom?) may go down without a fight = another way to WW3.

Tip for any remaining doubters: Look carefully at what the US/Zs do, listen not to what they say. Zs, for example, claim to be as innocent as the sky is blue, yet they are squatting on land/property improperly alienated = stolen by murdering violence from the hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers = ELO/Os of Palestine.

-=*=-

Proof of infamy (Zs):

motive = Herzl, 1897.

opportunity 1, Balfour, 1917.

m.o. 1 = Jabotinsky, 1923. ('We will kill anyone who gets in our way')

opportunity 2, WW2 + Holocaust.

m.o. 2 = much illegal immigration by Jews into Palestine 1934-'48.

means = Meir raised $50 million in the US for arms, '48, used in:

m.o. 3 = Plan dalet/Deir Yassin and similar, sporadically but continuously down to 'current moment.'

So means, motive, opportunity + m.o. & cui bono = crime in progress = 'the alien burglar/home-invasion analogy.' Since the 'crimes of IL's creation' have not been remedied (by 'right of return' + revest & reparations; none of which anywhere in sight, ditto for peace) AND anything built on an illegitimate basis remains illegitimate until remedied, *no* legitimacy ever was IL's to lose.

[*] Not so BTW: The Zs are the world's worse terrorists, and by a looong chalk. The "Samson option" has been mentioned, and elsewhere a 'cobalt bomb.' Cobalt itself is not a nuclear-explosive (absolutely the reverse), but it can be made intensively radioactive - and sufficient thereof could quite possibly poison the entire world, if coated around a nuclear warhead - of which the Zs are reputed to have 200+. In case you *still* have doubts, two items:

1) Proof - of Samson, or some analogue; google (without the {}): {Israel "would be prepared to take the region and even the whole world down with it" golda meir}

Her response About 335 results (time of writing): "Golda replied, “Yes, that’s exactly what I am saying.“"

2) Extending the threat (About 28,700 results): "We possess several hundred atomic warheads ... Most European capitals are targets for our air force."

Those two are both proof of Z's ultimate terrorism, and of our peril.

-=*=-

Proof of infamy (US): Too onerous to enumerate; from Afghanistan to Libya + beyond mentioned above, then see here for a pre-'02 list. Note the source (haw), then recall it's not who says it, but what's said that counts (Which, about the US/Zs, is 'pretty ordinary.')

Another not so BTW: The fact that the UN does not stop the US/Zs' rapine = proof that the UN itself is hopelessly corrupt ( = criminal by accessory mechanism), in fact UNGA181 specifies ethnic cleansing, which Plan Dalet etc. duly carried out via genocidal methods:

"The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date ..."

Final Q: We the people, especially the truth & justice = equity seekers, vastly outnumber both the obscenely rich <1% and our (sold-out = anti-democratic = tyrannical) so-called 'leaders;' we could peacefully take both our country (from rip-off FDI) and democracy back *anytime*. (But IF resistance THEN tumbrels - again, just saying.) All it needs is a bit of organisation (imagine "Joe Hill" playing quietly in the background, but with words clearly audible).

Well I'm ready; who will begin, and when?

[«back»]