1. renounce current corruption 2. bring alien attackers to justice 3. relax and enjoy truth and peace

Thesis/Subtitle: that the UN, the US/Zs and most 'Western' governments = Nuremberg-class corrupt

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

UN issues dire new warning on Syrian carnage
AM
 By Middle East correspondent Matt Brown, wires
 Updated December 31, 2012 10:53:01
  «The international envoy to Syria has warned the war in the country is worsening by the day, and that as many as 100,000 people could die in the next year.
Lakhdar Brahimi says dialogue between the government of president Bashar al-Assad and the opposition remains the only way to avoid further bloodshed, but the opposition forces remain adamant that Mr Assad's government cannot be involved in any peace plan.» 
[AusBC/Matt Brown, wires]

Comment; disingenuous #1: IF those who bother to look can see that the Syria 'problem' is far more fomented and supported by Syria-externals = the US plus some of its SQSHsO than it is Syria-internal THEN so can the UN - but the UN continues with this corrupt charade.

Comment; disingenuous #2: Ditto for the AusBC; they go along with US-lies when their actual, publicly-funded job is to fully and fairly inform the Aus-electorate. No democracy can function properly on an ill- or un-informed populace.

Trigger article 2:

German intel.: Qaeda behind terror in Syria
Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:44PM GMT
  «The German Federal Intelligence Service (BND) has revealed that al-Qaeda is responsible for numerous terrorist attacks in Syria, including the Houla massacre.
The BND estimates that al-Qaeda has carried out “about 90 terrorist attacks” in Syria between late last December and early July, German daily Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung wrote in an article on July 16.
The revelation was made public by the German government in response to a parliamentary question.
The German government also confirmed that it had received numerous reports from the BND on al-Qaeda’s involvement in the May 25 massacre in the Syrian town of Houla in the central province of Homs, in which 108 people, including dozens of children and women, were killed execution-style.» 
[presstv.ir]

Comment; Q: Why doesn't the AusBC pay attention? Suggested A: AusBC = corrupt. This item actually proves it.

-=*=-

Argument: No argument; just the Q: Where are all the honest people, why is there no effective protest?

-=*=-

Fazit: Bring the corrupt to justice; stop the US/Z-led wars = murdering for spoil.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

[3] disingenuous  adj. insincere, not candid.  disingenuously adv. [ibid.]

[4] charade  n. 1 (usu. in pl., treated as sing.) game of guessing a word from acted clues. 2 absurd pretence. [Provençal charra chatter][ibid.]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent war

peace on earth goodwill to all men - filthy lies deployed to deceive

.. 'belief' is mostly done ...

  .. in the absence of evidence ...

    .. ignore any/all metrics at your peril

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: yes, Virginia, one can blame

Concomitant: the yanks for most negative things

Corollary: like flushing our once-fine world down the tor-let.

-=*=-

Musing: On the one hand, nobody in their right mind wants to see death and destruction (aka mass-murder for spoil), on the other, our so-called 'leaders' don't listen to us (they don't care a fig) - nor do they listen to reason, or to any good sense either. Since our opinions sooo obviously don't matter - for proof, recall how Howard called the anti-wars "a mob" and totally ignored us, you wonder why the so-called 'leaders' = crooks set up such elaborate systems of lies?

-=*=-

Fazit: I planned to make a full post out of this - wars, rip-offs, neoliberalism as erring ideology; idiotic austerity as last step in the IMF/SAPs economic destruction, banksters etc., all together = mainly US M/I/C/$4a†-plex + I/J/Z-plex rapine, plus the XS-CO2-CCC leading to polar melting - but then I thought: "I don't give a fig." IF you're not convinced by now, that the US/Zs are the worst possible, cancerous pox on the planet - THEN kindly f**k off - err, go somewhere else; you're not worth my - err, you're wasting your own time.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent war

yes, stop killing children *in* the US and *by* the US and stop Zs murdering for soil

.. Madeleine Albright ...

  .. on ½mio dead Iraqi kids ...

    .. "we think the price is worth it."

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: stop *all* murdering

Concomitant: *all* over the world

Corollary: alien invaders *out*

-=*=-

Look at the outpouring in the US over 20 dead children.

Yet the US is murdering children across the planet; Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen etc., then Libya and via proxies in Syria, Iran threatened next.

Alien invading Zionists began murdering Palestinians, latest after Jabotinsky 'invented' permanent war as the only way for Jews to steal Palestine.

Another yet, other so-called 'leaders' in the world do *nothing* effective to stop the murdering.

WHY NOT?

Why are the US/Zs *allowed* to mass-murder for spoil?

Where are the leaders for truth, peace and justice?

Live blog: America mourns school shooting victims

Posted December 15, 2012 23:16:03 | Updated December 16, 2012 01:31:47

Flags in the United States will be flown at half-mast until Tuesday in honour of the victims of a mass shooting in a small town in Connecticut.

Twenty school children and seven adults were killed when a gunman opened fire at the Newtown Sandy Hook primary school shortly after 9:30am Friday (local time).

Crowds of grieving residents of the town have held candlelight vigils and attended church services to remember the victims of the one of the worst mass shootings in American history.

Police investigators and medical experts are continuing their investigations and formally identify the victims - most of them aged between five and 10 years old.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-15/america-mourns-27-dead-in-school-shooting/4430024

Compare to 40,000 dead in Syria *so far* - due *largely* to US fomenting and US-supported insurgents including Al Qaeda, smuggled into Syria via Turkey - and homes and infrastructure in Syria being smashed like Libya was smashed.

Compare to "The bombs killed as many as 140,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki by the end of 1945 ...In both cities, the overwhelming majority of the dead were civilians." - due *100%* to US A-bombs.

Compare to 100s of 1000s, perhaps 1.4mio+ dead since 2003 in Iraq, perhaps 2.5mio+ overall since 1991 - due *100%* to US aggression + invasion = Nuremberg-class war crimes.

No comparison at all, really.

the AusBC the Liberal party and all their filthy lies

.. JWHoward "All politicians lie!" ...

  .. but some lie more ...

    .. than others

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: deliberate lies are deployed to deceive

Q: who wants to be deceived; why are lies tolerated?

-=*=-

Musing: I'm not saying Lib is *much* worse than Lab; in some things - like war and neoliberalism, say - there is little to no difference, and note that bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic, since it offers voters *no* choice at all. In order for we, the people to make informed choices - like voting, say - we must be fully and fairly informed - or, would you say people deliberately deceived make competent voters? IF voters are deceived THEN election results are suspect if not outright invalid - and invalidly chosen representatives can have *no* mandate; all law such un-reps make are similarly invalid.

End musing.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

Russia admits Assad regime may fall
By Moscow correspondent Norman Hermant, staff and wires
Posted December 14, 2012 07:29:41 | Updated December 14, 2012 13:41:07
  «Mr Rasmussen also said the Syrian government's use of Scud missiles showed "utter disregard" for the lives of the Syrian people.
...
"It is known that Scuds are strategic, long-range missiles and are not suited for use against armed terrorist gangs," a statement said on Thursday.
The unguided Scud, famously fired into Israel by Iraq's Saddam Hussein during the 1991 Gulf War, can deliver a payload exceeding 3,500 kilograms over a range of 200 kilometres or more, defence analysts say.» 
[AusBC/sloppy or *deliberate* lies]

Comment 1: The "payload exceeding 3,500 kilograms" is simply, wildly wrong, as can be easily checked at wiki.

Comment 2: I only noticed Hermant after one of AusBC's 'regular' propagandistes (Anne Barker) abruptly disappeared from the AusBC - but note that it is not 'who says what' but 'what is said' - here, a sloppy or *deliberate* lie via Hermant?

Comment 3: The accuracy of Scuds is appallingly low - confirming what the Assad-spokesperson said, and illustrated by the photo below - assuming it is as represented, *not* at all a given. When people lie, all credibility goes out the window.

Trigger article 2:

13.10.2012
Fouad EL-Auwad
Western spies get discreetly involved in Syria
  «"The US intelligence agency CIA has been active for months, mainly in Turkey," he told DW. "The intelligence agencies that brought about the fall of the Gadhafi regime in Libya are now at work in Syria," Schmidt-Eenboom added.
...
"The new BND President Gerhard Schindler is willing to take risks and win back Western partners' trust after Germany lost it by staying out of Libya," Schmidt-Eenboom said. "That's why BND operations aimed at Syria are taking place."» 
[dw/'Western' spying report]

Comment: This article *spectacularly* proves what many long suspected; that the war against Assad is not a mass democratic movement as the 'Western' MSM + PFBCs allege, but deliberate subversion etc. by foreign forces, with the US as 'prime perpetrator' aiding infiltration of often Al-Qaeda jihadi invaders = Nuremberg-class war criminals. Assisting = accessories = bear part of the guilt.

Trigger article 3:

Gillard demands Brough's head as Abbott rejects Slipper 'witch-hunt'
 By chief political correspondent Simon Cullen
 Updated December 14, 2012 14:02:24
  «Questioned about his own knowledge of the case being filed in the court, Mr Abbott today said: "I had no specific knowledge of any of the details of the allegations against Mr Slipper until I read about them on the Saturday morning when they were in the paper."
On the morning that the allegations were revealed in the media, Mr Abbott released a statement at 9:16am demanding the Prime Minister remove Mr Slipper from the Speaker's chair.
However, the time stamp attached to the statement appears to show the document was created at 11:08pm the night before.
Mr Abbott's office is adamant the document was not created until the Saturday morning, and believes a computer glitch is behind the apparent discrepancy.» 
[AusBC/heat onto Libs, for a change]

Comment 1: Different subject, same theme = lies; here the Aus Lib 'leadership' caught with their mouths full of lies, the most amazing of which is from Abbott; that he claimed to have heard the story first only after it was in the Saturday papers, but his statement was prepared by his office the night before. An earlier item identified some of the Lib-lie suspects: Brough, Brandis, Pyne, Hockey and Julie Bishop (order as I found them), plus of course, Abbott. The Godwin Grech imbroglio apparently taught them nothing. Then see my "Abbott lies; not just the once; but in his admission too."

Comment 2: Note the form of Abbott's latest lie: "no specific knowledge" (emphasis mine.)

Comment 3: Then, he drags his office into it. Poor public servants - just like Godwin Grech.

-=*=-

Argument: The scale of Abbott&Co's lies is different to that of B, B & H's 2002+ lies, whereby 100s of 1000s if not 1.4mio+ Iraqis died as a direct result, after more than 1mio died from 1991-2003 - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to US-inspired, "worth it" Albright-approved sanctions. But lies are lies and all lies are damaging; Abbott&Co lie as part of their grubby grab for power - so far unsuccessfully, hopefully to remain so.

-=*=-

Fazit: It is the height of both arrogance and ignorance, for so-called 'leaders,' as any/all politicians, to lie to us. It *disables* democracy and de-legitimates them as representatives. Politicians who deceive the electorate are not democratic anything, they make themselves into vile tyrants.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent war

competition policy increasing productivity - and other 'economics' lies

.. a rising tide lifts all boats ...

  .. a smaller slice of a bigger pie = more ...

    .. off-shoring jobs pulls new workers out of poverty

-=*=-

Thesis: The glaringly obvious hardly ever discussed, let alone debated;

Q1: Why do 'the people' accept being ppp-dd'd?

Q2: - especially when it means being disadvantaged?

A: They hardly notice it at all, due to (US)MMH anaesthesia.

-=*=-

Musing: The 1st citation below blames "the sexual revolution of the ‘60s" - but I tend to discount this, all the way to the margins. Proof: I was there = the ‘60s. What *I* learnt was:

  « ... kids, be free,
be whatever you are,
do whatever you want to do,
just so long as you don't hurt anybody.» 

Next; crime/criminality - follows "do no harm:"

All harm = -ve person-to-person/thing interference = crime, possibly excepting restraining a 2nd person interfering with some 3rd (but recall unarmed bobbies.)

The 'basic' crimes are lying, cheating, theft & harm to some person/thing = land/property or someone's mind/body, up to murder.

It doesn't take a genius to see: "Don't touch things not yours!"

The next two lines of the song:

«And remember kids,
I am your friend.» 

Tip: To fully appreciate this post one should read all of each citation; I did - so you can too.

End musing.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

Western Powers Have Lost All Sense Of Morality: E. Michael Jones By Kourosh Ziabari 10 December, 2012
  «A U.S. author says Western states influenced by Israel have lost all sense of morality and are behaving in a criminal way that is dangerous to world peace.
“What we see in Obama’s murder of Osama bin Laden (in a helicopter strike) and various other figures by drone strikes is the criminal behavior which comes about as the natural consequence of the undermining of the moral law. St. Augustine pointed out some 1,500 years ago that when governments ceased to adhere to the moral law, they become nothing more than a band of criminals,” said E. Michael Jones in an exclusive interview with the Tehran Times conducted last month.
...
All of the NATO powers are run by criminals engaging in criminal behavior. The most recent example of that was the looting of Libya and the disgusting performance Hillary Clinton put on when she heard of Gaddafi’s death.» 
[countercurrents/Ziabari]

Comment 1: Jones' basic thesis correct (partly blame Jews), but too much religion; rest = not sex but psychopathic criminality.

Comment 2: Religion belongs only on the margins (if anywhere at all), proof: Since there are multiple, often contradictory versions, religion is internally inconsistent; for all to be free and equal, law may only address a common subset, and only just law may earn respect.

Comment 3: A 'must read' section in the cited article is from "Q: The Israeli regime" to the para with "the Talmud is a wicked book" in it. Still best is read the lot. Bringing the Israeli/Zionist criminals to justice would be possible, just as soon as enough of we, the people demanded it.

Trigger article 2:

Paul Krugman Discovers Marx (and Misses The Point)
By Ann Robertson & Bill Leumer
11 December, 2012
  «In the 1930s when labor unions were tenaciously fighting for working people, huge gains were made in terms of salaries and benefits. They conducted militant sit-down strikes and mobilized tens of thousands of people from the community to support labor’s struggles. Their successes were to a large degree responsible for the emergence of the so-called middle class that thrived in the 1950s and 1960s.» 
[countercurrents/Robertson & Leumer]

Comment 1: Unionism but worse, the Enlightenment disabled.

Comment 2: Basically, (economic) life has been going downhill (except for the <1%) since Thatcher (TINA), Reagan & Hawke/Keating began implementing neoliberalism. All else is history; and the *proof by result* of neoliberalism's failure (for us, we the people) is becoming ever more visible, like in the US with falling employment (approaching 50mio in poverty/on foodstamps), static to falling wages, sky-rocketing medical costs and general malaise. Continue ignoring these at your peril.

Comment 3: Yet there is no revolution; the people doze before their flat/wide-screen TVs, stuffed with take-out pizza and stupefied with beer - effectively wasting their lives away, apart from the MMH-titillation before them.

Trigger article 3:

Op-Ed Columnist
Robots and Robber Barons
By Paul Krugman
December 9, 2012
  «Yet that shift is happening - and it has major implications. For example, there is a big, lavishly financed push to reduce corporate tax rates; is this really what we want to be doing at a time when profits are surging at workers’ expense? Or what about the push to reduce or eliminate inheritance taxes; if we’re moving back to a world in which financial capital, not skill or education, determines income, do we really want to make it even easier to inherit wealth?» 
[nytimes/Krugman]

Comment 1: Complicity of MSM + academia - traitors and sell-outs, respectively.

Comment 2: Asking 'what we may want' is good - since in the current 'Western' democracies, we the people have as good as *zero* say in anything. Proof: Sure, we may vote for some candidate or other, but bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic; no matter who gets elected, we only get 'more of the same' = aggressively invasive = Nuremberg-class illegal wars (from Afghanistan to Zionist, via Iraq, Libya, now Syria and next(?) Iran), plus economically, ever more destructive (for us, we the people, not the <1%) privatisations and 'user-pays' = *un*-egalitarian services (electricity, say; for profit anything puts profit before service, worst = medicine for profit, profit before health), all = despised neoliberalism.

Comment 3: So-called 'professional' reporters, and/or so-called 'professional' economists, have had ~33 years to point out the failings of neoliberalism. We the people are still waiting for the penny to drop for those so-called 'professionals.' (Most of, see article 5.)

Comment 4: Same goes for the politicians who implement neoliberalism 'in drag' = disguised; either they know what they were/are doing to us, we the people - and thus were and still are criminals, OR they didn't know what they were/are doing = criminally negligent. You choose.

Trigger article 4:

Stevens warns central banks risk being 'captured'
PM
 By economics correspondent Stephen Long
Posted December 12, 2012 19:18:01
  «The head of the Reserve Bank has warned the world's most powerful central banks risk losing their independence after taking large-scale steps to stimulate their economies.
In a major speech in Thailand, Glenn Stevens said bond-buying and other policy efforts taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the US Federal Reserve were blurring the divide between government and central banks.» 
[AusBC against us, we the people]

Comment: RBA = error, banking swindle + not free market. IF the RBA (central banks) have 'policy options' THEN they should be answerable to the people via some proper democratic process BUT alleged 'independence' is clearly un- & anti-democratic.

Trigger article 5:

The Public Bank Option for Scotland: Ensuring Economic Sovereignty
By Ellen Brown
December 07, 2012
  «Perhaps the Scots will blaze a trail for economic sovereignty in the E.U., just as North Dakotans did in the U.S. A publicly-owned bank could help Scotland take control of its own economic destiny, by avoiding unnecessary debt to a private banking system that has become a burden to the economy rather than a pillar in its support.» 
[globalresearch/Brown]

Comment 1: How banking should be done.

Comment 2: Again, read all articles.

-=*=-

Fazit 1: A final *proof by result*; 'getting competitive by increasing productivity' means reducing unit costs = more work per person per hour, only really possible by introducing automation (OR just how many of us are slacker/bludgers?) - OR more hours BUT those also mean fewer employees = higher unemployment OR same work for lower wages/reduced conditions, therefore in all cases sinking average incomes. Shipping jobs off-shore of course makes it worse, and there's a natural limit to 'service positions' since people have to eat and that takes $s out of circulation - one needs some top-up = primary production (mining, say). IF most of the mining income goes off-shore too (~83%, say) AND foreign direct investment (FDI) also sucks income out of Aus, THEN our future looks bleak = spiral-down. Simple arithmetic really, and looong known, hence Fordism (from 1908, say) – but now ignored. Since I can see all this, what of govts and their expensive, so-called 'professional/academic' advisors?

Fazit 2: A fair exchange is no robbery - one meaning is workers are people too, so time to share the bounty around a bit better = *properly* tax the obscenely rich and provide all vital services on an egalitarian basis, or tumbrels for the rippers-off + their accessories.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent war

don't give in! - to knee-jerk anti-imperialism, anti-Americanism, or anti-Zionism - document using the truth, demanding justice for victims, & gaol++ for the psychopathic, murdering-to-steal criminals

.. this one ...

  .. is a long one ...

    .. please relax & enjoy

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: new! (for me) "proof by result"

Concomitant: we know "it is not simple"

Corollary: but think 'digital'

-=*=-

Musing: With the notable exception of NP-complete problems ("the time required to solve the problem using any currently known algorithm increases very quickly as the size of the problem grows" - example TSP), many of the problems of our world are practically solvable, indeed this is the essence of digital computing; that problems are reducible to a series of yes/no decisions (literally, the base-unit for all calculations is the binary-digit = 'bit' - only possible values being 0 and 1). But even then, one may need vast amounts of data (hence statistics bureaux), appropriate algorithms and super-computers. Is there a quicker way? IMHO yes; one may deploy Occam's razor ("mak[ing] the fewest assumptions" - example KISS), and deduce causes from observed results.

A word on language and 'framing,' we live more or less in a 'lie-cloud;' the more MSM + PFBCs we 'consume,' so the more lies, with more truth available to 'consumers' of the alternate media, largely internet & blogs. The alternates offer a range, from the mundane to the outrageous, whereby the 'knack' is to discern the truth - looping back to deduction and 'proof by result.' One way they lie to us is to distort the meaning of words, example is Reagan's "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." Note now that the US' 'enemies' are almost exclusively termed militants, jihadis and extremists etc., when the same terms apply equally to the US' own subversives, agitators, covert destabilisers, mercenaries (as now in Syria, Al-Qaeda) & 5th columns etc.. Because of the lies (see ppp-dd'd), almost no word retains its original meaning, hence my 'quoted' words. It's a signal to say: Consider carefully! Here, a lemma:

"It's not what they say, but what they do that counts."

Consider the word 'enemy' (in single quotes); these days as deployed in the (corrupt & venal) MSM + PFBCs on behalf of the US/Zs, it means “someone the US/Zs want to kill - i.e. typically some resource-owner, oil(US) or soil(Zs)” - instead of the strict dictionary meaning[1]. Years ago (pre 2002, say), I'd never have considered 'enemies,' but now I see that the US/Zs are the world's worst enemies - of us, we the people. Here, the 1st example of 'proof by result;' BECAUSE they attempt to 'rule' = monopolistically exploit/plunder the world, the US (greatest military power) and IL (illegitimate sprog; tail wagging dog, equal greatest criminal power), both murdering for spoil as they do, AND their neoliberal, *erring ideology* economic 'system,' by almost exclusively pursuing profit, mostly by *unfair* means, they have *denied* and/or *derailed* any and all efforts to save the planet from the impending XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe. Now *that's* a BIG problem (perhaps, 99.9% say, being the BIGGEST problem), and also to someone who might say: "You will be blaming the US/Zs for the weather next!" - I say, latest now: "Been there, done that."

A final word here on 'framing,' IF one deploys an 'enemy' word, here from my headline "knee-jerk;" THEN one invokes the enemy's frame, possibly transferring *some* advantage to that (detested) enemy. Thus, *extreme* caution is recommended; some *anti-disadvantage* should be simultaneously deployed. Here, mine: After considering 'proof by result,' to be "anti-imperialism, anti-Americanism, or anti-Zionism" is only a) perfectly logical, b) on the side of truth and justice and therefore c) correct. Best is not to invoke any enemy frame at all, but the prior a, b & c nevertheless still (always!) apply.

End musing.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

Are Israel’s Jews, Some of Them, on Their Way to Becoming Nazis?
By Alan Hart
December 05, 2012
  «... there will at some point be a final Zionist ethnic cleansing of Palestine, and that might well convert the rising, global tide of anti-Israelism into classical anti-Semitism, bringing on Holocaust II, shorthand for another great turning against Jews, ...
...
“The only way Israel is ever going to give up the occupation and its habit of military aggression is by going too far – by becoming such a Goliath that the Western world finally tells it to clean up its act or find some new allies.”» 
[ICH/Hart]

Comment 1a: Hart starts with a typical anti-anti-something 'explanation,' possibly illustrating the fear instilled in many by the Jews; as soon as someone criticises the Jews, they set out to curse & smear - if not kill their mostly justified critics.

Comment 1b: Hart can be valuable when he introduces 'new' material, like the above cited article's extended quote from Jabotinsky. On the other hand, and not for the 1st time, he invokes doubts of his own sincerity/integrity, like his "go to hell" comment. (Q: Could he actually be a deep-cover hasbarah-ist?)

Comment 1c: Hart's "classical anti-Semitism" is a coded trigger, reinforcing my (1b). Then, criminals never "give up" their criminality unless forced - hence police *forces*. What is *required* is effective policing; arrest, try, convict & punish the so-called 'leaders,' then RoR+RaR = right of return plus revest and reparations for the hapless victims, their heirs & successors - there can never be peace without justice.

Comment 2a: See my "bipedal brutal pigs" and its three quotes, here in somewhat shorter form:

1. Herzl(1897): "Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor [Palestinians] must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."

2. Jabotinsky(~1923): "Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer to Arab objections to Zionist control of the territory."

3. Ben-Gurion(1936-39): "... we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, ..."

Comment 2b: The quotes out of their own mouths convict the prime-perpetrators = Zionists, now Israel. The deafening silence convicts all non-actively-opposing bystanders - like the UN (it's their job!), and most 'Western' governments, say.

Comment 2c: Proof by result = country-theft by murdering-violence; the Zio-Nazis preceded the D-Nazis (both perpetrated aggressive invasions, and the Zio-Nazis went on to ethnically-cleanse almost the entire country of Palestine by genocidal methods); the essential difference is that the 'the world' went after the D-Nazis (= WW2), but the Zio-Nazis are tolerated by some = bad, then worse, are actively helped by others (UK, US, D etc.). Worst, is that the Zio-Nazis are *still active* in their un-remedied crime-scene. Why the bloody-hell that?

-=*=-

Trigger article 2:

It’s time for the media to talk about Zionism
By Philip Weiss
December 05, 2012
  «Last week, New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan characterized me as "the anti-Zionist Jewish-American journalist ...
I believe the media have refused to explore the Zionist issue ...
But so long as these beliefs are not examined, and Israel and its supporters continue to play such a large role in our policymaking, the silence is bad for Jews. It allows people who are justifiably angry over our foreign policy to believe that all Jews support Israel, or suspect that we disguise our dual loyalty with misleading prescriptions about American security. It allows Zionists to seek cover for our country's blind support for Israel by stating that there is no difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism - when there is absolutely a difference.» 
[ICH/Weiss]

Comment 1: Typical, that a Jew is worried about other Jews, with no idea of actually securing justice for the Jews' main victims, namely those who survived the Zionists' murderous attacks to become the improperly dispossessed ELO/Os (justice as I suggest above, namely RoR+RaR), let alone stopping the crimes and bringing any Zionist perpetrators to justice. Here, a note on 'facts on the ground:' Whatever one person/group does, can always be reversed by some other person/group: noone, and certainly no Zionist/Israelis, can ever legitimately own stolen land/property.

Comment 2: Nice to find 'kindred thoughts,' even if slightly mangled:

Comment to Weiss article
  «fascistsloveplunder · 18 hours ago
one more thing.
how can such a virulent strain of ideology EVER be called liberal- as in liberal zionist? huh?
could we have had liberal nazis, for instance?
i think it's another case of the word liberal being ruined and made useless. as with neo CONSERVATIVE ruining the word conservative. neo LIBERAL is the theft of the political meaning of liberal, at least as i understood liberal to mean. seems to me all orwellian stuff for the nwo psyop propaganda world we shafted with these days.
by stealing the words, they steal our arguments. so, liberal zionism sounds like it's meant to soften the terror in the real definition- or, what zionism APPEARS to mean, BY ITS BELIEFS, MOTTOS AND ACTIONS- THE ONES YOU CAN HEAR AND SEE WITH YOUR EARS AND EYES.» 
[ICH/Weiss ibid. - reader comment]

Comment: What I said, sort of; words having their meanings twisted, it's not what is said but what is done, etc..

-=*=-

Trigger article 3:

An Answer to the Anti-anti-war Left
by Jean Bricmont / December 5th, 2012
  «Of course, the U.S. government is scarcely aware of the existence of the anti-anti-war Left. The United States decides whether or not to wage war according to the chances of succeeding and to their own assessment of their strategic, political and economic interests. And once a war is begun, they want to win at all costs. It makes no sense to ask them to carry out only good interventions, against genuine villains, using gentle methods that spare civilians and innocent bystanders.
For example, those who call for “saving Afghan women” are in fact calling on the United States to intervene and, among other things, bomb Afghan civilians and shoot drones at Pakistan. It makes no sense to ask them to protect but not to bomb, because armies function by shooting and bombing.» 
[antiwar/dissidentvoice/Bricmont]

Comment 1: This article is where the "knee-jerk" in my title came from; as no snip can ever be representative, this article should be read in its entirety.

Comment 2: Some people do complain, that there is no anti-war left, be any such Left, Right or Centre etc.. Of course it's nonsense - there definitely is an anti-war group, and neither small nor shabby - just ignored. Which brings up the next Q: Why are sooo many decent people sooo silent?

Comment 3: Anti-war at the moment = all of anti-imperialism, anti-Americanism and anti-Zionism, because it's the US/Zs 'driving' most wars, and the wars are basically for resources; US - oil/gas/pipelines, and Zs - soil. Plus, the US/Zs press for hegemony; Zs in the ME and US wherever they want, where 'want' is defined as places with resources to grab, or competition to oppose/disable/conquer. But I suppose that you, dear reader, know this by now.

-=*=-

Trigger article 4:

“Legal Imperialism” and International Law: Legal Foundations for War Crimes, Debt Collection and Colonization
By Prof. James Petras
December 03, 2012
  «Imperial legal doctrines and judicial decisions set the groundwork for imperial wars and economic pillage. The empire’s legal experts redefine assassinations, coercion, torture and arbitrary arrests as compatible with the ‘constitutional order’ by claiming imminent and constant threats to the security of the imperial state.
...
In this sense, imperial rulers are not ‘lawless’ as some liberal critics would argue; they function in accordance with ‘imperial jurisprudence’ and are faithful to the legal doctrines of empire building.» 
[globalresearch/Petras]

Comment: I will only make a few responses:

1. I don't agree with Petras' thrust, typified by the 2nd para cited above. Making up *bad* law, ignoring good law, cannot be termed "not ‘lawless’" - see next.

2. Only just law may earn respect. I list the 'basic' crimes as lying, cheating, theft and murder. The US/Zs are 'prime perpetrators' of all those; their SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on, the UN and anyone who does not actively oppose that group make themselves accessories, and I simply cannot understand how this criminal group can operate (might does not make right); repeat Q: Why are sooo many decent people sooo silent? We, the (decent) people vastly outnumber the crooks. One may understand lawyers (apparently as good as zero morals), but what about the rest in the universities? Why are they largely 'on the wrong side?' - see next:

3. Boo, hiss! - Not at Petras, but at all crooks, especially crooks who murder to steal, all the while claiming to be 'good guys.' - Grrr!

-=*=-

Fazit 1: There's nothing at all "knee-jerk" about my anti-criminality.

Fazit 2: On Zionism/Israel, my 3 points in conclusion:

1. It was obvious from latest Herzl(1897), that the 'Zionist project' was by definition criminal: "the process of expropriation and the removal ..." Yet Balfour extended UK 'support.' Then came Jabotinsky(~1923): "Unremitting force..." as reinforcement. The next yet:

2. It was obvious from latest 1947, that the UN was corrupt; UNGA181: "an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State ... shall be evacuated ..." (my emphasis). No just person in their right mind would deliberately try to write 'improper dispossession of existing natives' into any law, but there it is in black & white. Recall only just law may earn respect. Then came Plan Dalet & Deir Yassin (and all the vicious etc.s; such outrages continuing intermittently, right down to the 'current moment.') Still, the now obviously criminal Zionists were and are 'allowed' to continue effectively un-checked. Another yet:

3. From Weiss: "... that all Jews support Israel," blah blah, him trying to object. BUT: The 'Zionist project' Israel, latest from its 1897 formulation, was and still is a criminal enterprise. *THAT* is simultaneously the 'greatest' achievement and 'eternal' damnation of *ALL* Jews (excepting possibly active anti-Zionists (perhaps including Weiss, but so far all such = ineffective, and anyway very much in the minority - again obviously) - proof: Illegitimate, un-remedied, Nuremberg-class crime-scene = Israel - is both allowed & supported to continue on its hideous way; ever more killing, ever more stealing.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] enemy  n. (pl. -ies) 1 person actively hostile to another. 2 a (often attrib.) hostile nation or army. b member of this. 3 adversary or opponent (enemy of progress). [Latin: related to *in-2, amicus friend] [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

[3] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [ibid.]

-=*=-

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

Merkel joins the US 'great game' drags Germany's name into the mud sets herself up for war-crime allegations

.. Syria is being smashed ...

  .. because Assad won't play ...

    .. as a US-SQSHsO = puppet-traitor

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: why can't the US++ just buy oil?

Concomitant: Oh, no; they want control

Corollary: plus the economic rent

-=*=-

Trigger article:

NATO gives go-ahead to send Turkey Patriot missiles
04.12.2012
  «Final approval for the deployment now has to come from Germany, ... Technical details, such as the number of missiles and their locations, still have to be worked out.
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said he expected "a broad parliamentary backing" for the move back home, ...» 
[Deutsche Welle]

Comment 1: Germany feels 'compelled' to attend, since its 'absence' at the smashing of Libya was noted, and its participation in the subsequent rapine was 'discouraged.'

Comment 2: In a slightly different vein, Germany's armed forces want to be present at the smashing of Syria, since they missed out vis-à-vis Libya. Bluntly, they missed out on the 'fun.'

Comment 3: Since the brutal smashing of Syria is a war crime, any participation by Germany means the country as a whole, its military and especially the 'order-givers' = the ruling politicians make themselves war criminals.

Comment 4: Note Westerwelle said that he expected "a broad parliamentary backing" - and then note, that bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic, itself showing that the German people are 'out of the loop' (= sham-democracy) - but nevertheless, will be judged as equally culpable.

Comment 5: Since the UN and its agencies are corrupt, it is unlikely that Merkel&Co will be brought to justice. However, all components in the preceding comment (3) will nevertheless become guilty - if/when Germany's patriot missiles contribute to the killing of a single Syrian. Additionally, under 'normal' law, threatening assault is treated as if an actual assault had occurred = just the decision to deploy forces triggers the guilty-status.

-=*=-

Fazit: Germany, post-WW2 was already sunk, in two ways; a) the actual defeat then b) its occupation, the latter (by the US) persisting to the 'current moment.' Worse, instead of just saying "sorry" to Jews, Germany set out to aid Israel = the Zionist project, known since Herzl (1897) & latest Jabotinsky (1923) to be a wickedly criminal land/property theft by violence project = ethnic cleansing of Palestine by genocidal methods, performed by alien invaders = ultimate, Nuremberg-class war crime. Proof of German perfidy is supplying Israel with nuclear-capable submarines, for the Zs' "Samson Option."

The 'normal' German burghers (analogous to 'us, we the people') mostly think that Germany 'grew out of' its WW2 sins. Merkel&Co prove the opposite; Germany is an active 'player' in the criminal US' 4th Reich.

-=*end*=-

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = permanent war

US hypocrisy US+Z criminality truly amazing idiocy

Musing 1: Some knew, or many of us feared, that following 9/11, *someone* would get smashed. We could even have guessed who, since we saw the videos of the Taliban destruction of the ancient stone Buddhas of Bamiyan. The Taliban had provided input into their own demonisation. Anyway, despite "there are no good targets in Afghanistan" [Rumsfeld then interrupted Bush to say], it was on. Apart from smashing a Muslim regime, there were 'extenuating (if oily) circumstances,' namely that the Taliban had refused an offer of allowing a pipeline, delivered along with the handy negotiating phrase: 'you may choose; a carpet of gold or bombs.'

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

December 1, 2012
Flow of Arms to Syria Through Iraq Persists, to U.S. Dismay
  «WASHINGTON — The American effort to stem the flow of Iranian arms to Syria has faltered because of Iraq’s reluctance to inspect aircraft carrying the weapons through its airspace, American officials say.» 
[nyt/for the empire]

Comment: Now *that's* hypocrisy. Just in the remote off-chance of you, dear reader, not yet knowing: The 'extension' of the Syrian 'Arab-Spring uprising,' turning it from any remotely democratic = by definition peaceful protest event or even movement, not into any 'civil war' but into a full-on *alien invasion* - arms and men both, mainly via Turkey (= NATO 'partner,' EU 'aspirant') = all sorts of invading armed idiots, perhaps a majority of whom are Al-Qaeda - attacking the legitimate govt. & not quite so incidentally, leading to mass deaths amongst the innocent population & wholesale destruction of homes and infrastructure - how would *you* like all that - in your neighbourhood?

And all the while, the US + SQSHsO are supporting the invaders, with all sorts of 'advice' (including intel., communications equipment AND special-forces = boots on the ground), plus lethal arms = matériel (mainly from Saudi Arabia, Qatar). The US++ feeds one side then dares to complain of others' countervailing efforts. As I said; *breathless* hypocrisy.

Trigger article 2:

Educating the President
by Philip Giraldi, November 22, 2012
  «And if that weren’t enough, the U.S. appears prepared to provide heavy weapons to the Syrian opposition while the question of whether or not to negotiate with Iran continues to hang in the air, though it will probably be rejected due to the usual domestic political considerations, which means AIPAC. U.S. client Israel is, as always, creating fresh crises obliging Washington to twist like a pretzel to demonstrate its love for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and all his works.» 
[antiwar/Giraldi]

Comment 1: Note the confirmation: "the U.S. appears prepared to provide heavy weapons to the Syrian opposition" - whereas "appears prepared" should be taken with a grain of (ME) salt.

Comment 2: Note also the suggested, recommended policies. *Not* included is any suggestion of justice for the hapless, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os; my suggestion = RoR+RaR = Right of Return + Revest and Reparation (latter as in full = acceptable) - and a sincere "Sorry!"

-=*=-

Argument: Those who have not 'twigged' by now, that the US+Zs are the number-one criminals *on* the planet, *plus* the number-one threat *to* the planet - may leave (in the Aus-vernacular: Kindly piss off!)

-=*=-

Musing 2: Since the aggressive invasion of Afghanistan, we've had ditto for Iraq, Libya, Syria underway and Iran always "on the table" - recall Wesley Clark (US 4 Star General) US will attack 7 countries in 5 years - advance warning of criminal intent. It's what the US does; bullets and bombs can only destroy - look at what they leave behind.

It's never what they say - it's what they do that counts = mass murders and grisly destruction - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to US+Zs.

-=*=-

Fazit: Stop the US+Z criminals - now!

proof of US+Zs' criminality + MSM & PFBCs' perfidy actually of course it's *more* proof; they keep offending, I'll keep reporting

.. read ...

  .. these ...

    .. and weep

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: 'believe' lies, get ripped-off

Concomitant: from resource-rent to

Corollary: murder for spoil

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

Netanyahu’s War Crime
by Philip Giraldi, November 29, 2012
  «The Nuremberg Trials established that initiating a war of aggression is the ultimate war crime in that all other evils spring from it. ... Israel and its friends are fond of saying that there is a madman loose in the Middle East when they refer to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but in truth there is only one madman who is assiduously seeking war and more war and that is Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.» 
[antiwar/Giraldi]

Comment: Apart from anything else, Iron Dome = more than 2/3 *not* intercepted = total failure, especially if big, live HE++ rockets were to arrive.

-=*=-

Trigger article 2:

Fake AP Graph Exposes Israeli Fraud and IAEA Credulity
November 30th, 2012
Gareth Porter
  «Nothing in that description of the alleged modeling is documented by the type of graph shown by the AP story.
The IAEA report concludes by saying, “The information also identifies models said to have been used in those studies and the results of these calculations, which the Agency has seen.”» 
[antiwar/lobelog/Porter]

Comment 1: Credibility? What credibility? We we warned at the start of the current IAEA epoch; the 'top man' is in the US' pocket - he said as much himself = corrupt.

Comment 2: Odd is that AusBC does not seem to have 'stenographed' this (but see article 4).

-=*=-

Trigger article 3:

Assange to RT: Entire nations intercepted online, key turned to totalitarian rule
Published: 30 November, 2012, 11:34
  «JA: We have this position where as we know knowledge is power, and there’s a mass transfer as a result of literally billions of interceptions per day going from everyone, the average person, into the data vaults of state spying agencies for the big countries, and their cronies – the corporations that help build them that infrastructure... but it’s extremely dangerous once there is any sort of corruption occurring in the power. Because absolute power corrupts, and when it becomes corrupt, it can affect a lot of people very quickly.» 
[rt/Assange]

Comment 1: "Any sort of corruption" - he know it's already here; rife, endemic & without effective countervailing power, terminal.

Comment 2: Brrr. Use it (the internet) before we lose it.

Trigger article 4:

Tick, Tick, Boom!
Broadcast: 23/10/2012
Reporter: Trevor Bormann
  «GENERAL DANNY YATOM: “Everybody has to understand that once Iran will have a bomb, nobody will dare to attack the Iranians because nobody, including the Americans because the fear will be and the concern will be that they will retaliate by a nuclear attack”.» 
[AusBC/Bormann]

Comment 1: What I found whilst looking for the "Fake AP Graph" story in AusBC; just the headline is already more than enough to a) confirm AusBC propaganda and b) convict the AusBC of perfidy and worse - their one and only job is to honestly inform Aus-voters and the population as a whole - total fail. Throw them all into gaol!

Comment 2: In the face of US/Z criminality and UN/IAEA corruption *plus* the CIA opinion that Iran is *not* pursuing a nuclear weapon, what the quote unambiguously implies is what should be understood by all: Any Iranian bomb would never be for 1st use, but a 100% effective preventative against *being* attacked. That the US & Zs are so keen to prevent Iran getting its own attack-protection is *100% proof* of US/Z intentions to smash Iran = yet another Nuremberg-class war crime; off to the gallows with them all!

-=*=-

Argument: No argument required, except to say:

-=*=-

Fazit: Lies, cheating, all rip-offs and murdering theft must be stopped - soonest.

IF Arabs/Muslims got a brain AND grew some balls THEN they'd cut 'the West' off from all oil and blockade Israel

.. there can never be ...

  .. peace without truth & justice ...

    .. all else is crime, or craven, cowardly surrender

-=*=-

Single message: *All* people who do not condemn Israel as an illegitimate entity, mass-murdering to steal - make themselves accessories to Nuremberg-class war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Because that's what the Zionists did and are still doing: They are ethnically cleansing Palestine by genocidal methods after an aggressive alien invasion.

I do so condemn Israel, plus most 'Western' so-called 'leaders' (from all sides; recall bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic) and most 'Western' MSM + PFBCs like the AusBC. Some effective action must be taken against Israel (and its main supporter, the US) - to stop the vicious crimes and get the world back to peace. Bastards all, the perpetrators and their cowardly craven, snivelling quisling accessories.

Note that this is the Jews' major achievement: Mass-murdering to steal almost (so far) an entire country, not to mention being the world's worst liars (hasbarah) and cheats (flouting UN + all 'just' law). A ghastly legacy the world will never forget - nor ever forgive.

a 'quickie' to Alan Kohler an AusBC 'economist'

.. if laid end-to-end ...

  .. all the world's economists ...

    .. would not reach a *valid* conclusion

-=*=-

Thesis/Subtitle: ~35 years of TINA! = voodoo economics

Concomitant: and almost all we have to show for it

Corollary: is massive debt + unemployment

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Four years on, the economy is failing once more
 By ABC's Alan Kohler
Updated November 28, 2012 10:03:23
  «In 2008, the threat of a global economic catastrophe spurred politicians on to take preventive action. But this time around, the will just doesn't seem to be there, writes Alan Kohler.» 
[AusBC/Kohler]

Comment 1: There was little to no 'preventive action' - on various grounds; Rudd was one of the few who went 'classic Keynesian' (with apparent success), most others just used 'band-aids' - except where the banks were 'bailed out' = criminal.

Comment 2: 'Classic Keynesian' is mostly banned, by the (erring!) neoliberal ideology.

Comment 3: What I submitted to the (ugly, tyrannical) AusBC moderation process, delineated by { }:

{The 'standard discourse' - which Kohler is part of (not necessarily his *personal* fault, but he does choose to take part) - cannot acknowledge certain things, whilst actively suppressing others.

Kohler writes "But that is impossible because it is caught in an austerity loop where a fiscal multiplier larger than one is amplifying the impact on the economy of budget cutbacks."

 - which accords with the theory I learnt 'back then' - but is now largely ignored - see my into-para.

Now see Ellen Brown, "It’s the Interest, Stupid!" wherein is written: "In the 2012 edition of Occupy Money released last week, Professor Margrit Kennedy writes that a stunning 35% to 40% of everything we buy goes to interest."

It's easy to see how this might occur; each 'stage' in the production process (primary producer, wholesaler/distributor then retailer, plus possibly 'landlords' all round) - all depend partly on credit, the % on which is simply passed on = stacked up - horrendous!

Then, neoliberalism = cut taxes (easy; mainly off the rich) and cut govt. services 'to match' - but difficult, since many people actually depend on govt. services...

At the same time, they privatise govt. monopolies (Telstra, electricity, etc.) - which quickly results in higher prices (der!) - because of the profits now added on = ripped off.

The worst is medicine for profit, whereby profit takes precedence over results - see the US.

Then, there's "The Remarkable Model Of The Commonwealth Bank Of Australia" - more Ellen Brown.

Long story short: We the people are being sold-out to the banksters; IF Ellen Brown can work it out THEN many others can too - like our politicians, say. That those politicians nevertheless work *against* ours, we the people's interests - speaks volumes; the only really helpful response may be: Tumbrels.}

-=*=-

PS AusBC comments are limited to ~500 words, 200 preferred; the above submit was counted at 301 by MSWord. What could be added (absent haste, word-limits, and the *ever present* threat of AusBC-moderator censorship) - is this: There are better systems 'out there' but are excluded because of such things as the "Washington Consensus," "World Bank," "IMF" and especially neoliberalism - just a few terms which together spell *US/bankster tyranny*. Then ask yourself this: Who are the US' 'special little darlings?' (Tip: Murderers for soil.) Ah!

-=*=-

PPS IF you are puzzled, dear reader, THEN it may be because you have not yet read my two EB citations...

the story of Israel's illegitimacy in 97 neutral words

criminality test:

 means, motive and opportunity + modus operandi and cui bono?

means: Meir, $US50mio for arms

motive: Herzl, Zionism

opportunity: Balfour, Holocaust, UNGA181

modus operandi: Jabotinsky = violence; Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin++ = ethnic cleansing by genocidal methods = crimes against humanity

cui bono? Only Zs; US(UK+) help, partly against own interests = traitorous accessories

worse;

more criminality: UNSC242 *inadmissibility of acquisition by war*

 ->Israel squats almost entirely on stolen land/property

perfidy: UNGA273 - promised but never honoured 181 & 194

blasphemy: 'some g-d promised them'

lies meant to deceive: hasbarah

much worse;

immigration (Aliyah Bet); partly illegal = alien invasion

Zs not wanted = aggression

aggression = Nuremberg

Nuremberg = gallows

QED

PPS to 'vile Z-criminality' proof by direct observation vs. (lying!) hasbarah assertion

.. 1. what I said - burglary/home invasion ...

  .. 2. what I said - UN corruption, accessories ...

    .. 3. warning on wiki - it's quite possibly undermined

Thesis/Subtitle: it is not *who* says, but *what* is said

Concomitant: it's not what's *said* but what's *done*

Corollary: an entity based on crime is illegitimate

-=*=-

Preamble: This post started life as a PPS to my "proof of vile criminality" article, but deserves to stand alone.

The wicked villainy of the I/J/Z-plex in Palestine did not end in 1967 - it is ongoing = continuous to the 'current moment,' as the vicious attacks on Gaza this past week or so clearly demonstrate.

The attacks are illegal; the world's 4th military power, also the world's most militarised entity, on a 'turkey-shoot' against the I/J/Z-plex' hapless victims, armed with little more than AK-47s and fireworks-like = primitive rockets. Israel the aggressive occupier, attacks those the Zs improperly = illegally dispossessed.

For those paying close attention, the attacks are *clearly* illegal, but the illegality is 'masked' to the general public by a) world 'leaders' and b) their running-dogs = MSM + PFBCs erroneous statements = pro-Israel propaganda.

Those who support criminals make themselves criminals by the accessory-process - what a shitty, corrupt world!

There can be no justice without prosecution & restitution.

There can be no peace without justice.

End preamble.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

It's Palestinians Who Have the Right to Defend Themselves
The US and Britain stand behind Israel's onslaught on Gaza. Justice requires a change in the balance of forces on the ground
By Seumas Milne
November 21, 2012
"The Guardian"
  «The way western politicians and media have pontificated about Israel's onslaught on Gaza, you'd think it was facing an unprovoked attack from a well-armed foreign power. Israel had every "right to defend itself", Barack Obama declared...
He was echoed by Britain's foreign secretary, William Hague, who declared that the Palestinian Islamists of Hamas bore "principal responsibility" for Israel's bombardment ...
In fact, an examination of the sequence of events over the last month shows that Israel played the decisive role in the military escalation ... and, crucially, the assassination of the Hamas commander Ahmed Jabari last Wednesday during negotiations over a temporary truce.
...
It's that to portray Israel as some kind of victim ... is a grotesque inversion of reality. Israel has after all been in illegal occupation of both the West Bank and Gaza, where most of the population are the families of refugees who were driven out of what is now Israel in 1948, for the past 45 years.» 
[ICH/guardian/Milne]

Comment 1: What I said - burglary/home invasion ...

Comment 2: As I said in my "no, Mr president," perpetrators of a crime, here ethnic cleansing by genocidal methods have *no* right to defend the proceeds of such crime.

-=*=-

Trigger article 2:

Destroying International Law And Moral Norms
How Many Children will Israel Be Allowed To Slaughter?
By Stuart Littlewood
November 20, 2012
  «Despite the piles of dead in Gaza and - for the second time in four years - the row upon row of charred and broken little bodies of children, Western leaders still shirk their duty and call on the two parties to restart the squalid, lopsided peace process that had led nowhere and only serves to give the Israelis more time to consolidate their territorial gains.
Instead of carrying out their responsibilities, they shamelessly shovel their foul mess onto the Palestinians to clean up. What are the Palestinians supposed to negotiate? Why should they have to bargain for their freedom and property with the thugs that stole it?» 
[ICH/Littlewood]

Comment 1: What I said - UN corruption, accessories ...

Comment 2: The Littlewood article lists some more (but I assume not all) UN resolutions Israel violates, then there's the great swag of resolutions that never actually 'made it' - due to US vetoes. *This* is one way how the UN is corrupted; never a good look. Then, there's the UN corruption in respect to Iran; wickedness almost without end.

-=*=-

Trigger article 3:

EI exclusive: a pro-Israel group’s plan to rewrite history on Wikipedia
  «A pro-Israel pressure group is orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged.» 
[whatreallyhappened/electronicintifada]

Comment: IMHO, corruption of wiki is already underway. Take the '47-8 war in Palestine. Wiki claims 'civil war' - whereas I say 'alien invasion.'

Lemma: Wiki's declared m.o. includes favouring opinion (otherwise unsubstantiated, but where so-called 'experts' agree), which may overrule (unconsidered = missing, say) facts. The opportunities for corruption are clear - when, say, wiki favours *Jewish* opinion on Palestinian Qs?

Proof: Jews were in the great *minority* in Palestine, when Herzl revved Zionism up. By Jabotinsky's "Iron Wall," Jewish purchases in Palestine had effectively stalled. Jabotinsky suggested theft-by-violence and that's exactly what was inflicted on the hapless, mostly Palestinian ELO/Os. That's what the immigrant (partly illegal, Aliyah Bet) = *invading* Zs did = aggressive, alien invasion (= Nuremberg-class war crime), *not* civil war. All illegitimacy of Israel proceeds from this obvious, visible crime = murder for soil. QED.

-=*=-

Argument: Almost all the time, from almost all of the 'Western' MSM + PFBCs, we get almost all reports 'as seen' from the (criminal, lying) Israeli side, with only occasional mention from the point of view of Israel's victims (the hapless, mostly Palestinian ELO/Os, their heirs and successors).

My personal proof of press perfidy stems from ~1967, when I was deceived = propagandised by the erring = lying narrative of 'brave' Israel facing unjustified Arab attack; the exact opposite = "grotesque inversion" of reality - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to the AusBC, my almost sole source of 'current affairs' = news. The AusBC, as Israel, remains an un-remedied crime-scene.

-=*=-

Fazit: IF we the people want a better world - and I can't imagine that the great majority doesn't - THEN we have to work for *less* crime, rather than *more* crime = mainly US + Zs' + SQSHsO depredations. Since almost *all* power is out of our, we the people's hands, due to the tyrannical behaviour of our so-called 'leaders,' either those leaders get effectively active (but recall tigers changing their spots) - or we the people will have to get effectively active on behalf of truth and justice, with proper prosecutions of *all* perpetrators = wicked prime offenders + their cowardly accessories.

Suggestion: After prosecution comes punishment (range = gaol -> gallows), plus full reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

-=*=-

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

proof of vile criminality by Israel plus accessories

posit: that Israel is an illegitimate, criminal and cancerous entity (*not* a State), which causes misery and destruction, begetting ever more corruption as it lies, cheats and murders to steal.

-=*=-
 
 [update, 14:41]

-=*=-

Preamble: "It is not simple!" - OK, so step-by-step;

Any crime-investigation considers means, motive and opportunity + modus operandi and cui bono?

Associating the first three with an alleged perpetrator is usually enough for a conviction; all five = an 'open and shut' case.

The crimes under consideration are a) crimes against humanity and b) war crimes of the Nuremberg-class.

The crime scene is pre-UNGA181 Palestine, the time-frame is from 1897 at the latest, right down to the 'current moment.'

The accused are parts of the I/J/Z-plex, the alleged prime-perpetrators are the Jewish immigrants to pre-UNGA181 Palestine, their heirs and successors.

The alleged victims are mainly Palestinian ELO/Os, their heirs and successors, many now resident in the miserable mini-Bantustans they've been squeezed into by murdering force.

The alleged accessories are the UK, US + other SQSHsO *regimes* plus the UN and lastly, the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs like the AusBC.

A note on crime; the definition depends partly on the law; IF the law itself is inadequate or corrupt = 'an ass' = 'contrary to common sense' say, THEN one must revise it or its effect - since only just law may earn respect.

The tightly-focussed intent is to show necessary and sufficient proof-by-result, so we can identify the enemies of humanity, truth & justice. Some points may occur in multiples, if thought helpful.

-=*=-

This blog-item is part of and repeats some material from a loose group of recent items:

• bipedal brutal pigs
• perverse politicians criminal Jews/Zionists corrupt UN justice ...
• are Hague and Netanyahu a) liars, b) idiots or c) criminals?
• hey you 'leaders!' - got any balls at all? stop the Zs slaughtering!
• vile Anglo/Judaic conspiracy *proof* of AusBC, Aus-govt. perfidy ...
• Why doesn't the world stop the barbarian Jews?
• mass-murdering for soil ethnic cleansing genocide
• Mr Samson I presume - do you nuke?
• no, Mr president; Israel has no right of self defence
• the I/J/Z-plex illegit-morality threatens us all

End preamble.

-=*=-

The case for the prosecution:

1) motive Herzl(1897): coveting land-not-theirs formalised;

 "expropriation [of land/property] and the removal [of ELO/Os]"

2) accessory Balfour(1917): UK agrees to Z-interference;

 "do not propose ... to consult them [existing natives]"

3) means Jabotinsky(~1923): analysis + strategy;

 "No native population would stomach the intrusion ... Unremitting force"

4) method immigration by Jews into Palestine (1934-48), partly illegal (Aliyah Bet) = alien invasion

5) method Ben-Gurion(1936-39): analysis + strategy;

 "“We ... are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending ... [they] own the land"

Comment: aliens attack natives = Nuremberg-class war crime

Proof of Zionist criminality

6) method UNGA181(1947): *Partition into two states*

Comment: thought to violate the UN charter; no UNSC action = not law

Comment: not enforced (see UNGA273), to the 'current moment'

7) means Meir(1948): raised $US50mio from diaspora for arms

8) modus operandi Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin(1948) = ethnic-cleansing using genocidal attacks

Comment: Deir Yassin is but one outrage; such continue to 'current moment'

Comment: aliens attack natives = Nuremberg-class war crime

Proof of Zionist criminality

9) method unilateral declaration of independence(1948): no basis in law

10) accessory Truman(1948): US-interference, recognition

Comment: thought for electoral reasons - plus US coveting of ME oil

10) accessory UNGA194(1948): *right of return*

Comment: not enforced (see UNGA273), to the 'current moment'

11) accessory UNGA273(1949): *Israel, UN membership*

Comment: Israel promised to honour 'Charter obligations,' UNGA181 & UNGA194

Comment: not enforced, to the 'current moment'

Proof of Israeli perfidy; still no Palestinian state, still no return.

12) modus operandi 'war of Z's choice'(1967)

Comment: aggressive war = more Nuremberg-class war crime

Proof of Israeli criminality

13) modus operandi Israeli attacks USS Liberty(1967): 34 dead, 170+ wounded

Proof of more Israeli perfidy plus criminality

14) accessory UNSC242(1967): *inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war*

Comment: not enforced, to the 'current moment'

Comment: By not stopping crime, the UN makes itself an accessory.

Cui bono? = who benefits? Only Israel 'for sure,' possibly US since the US is still number one supporter, but could be coerced, mistaken, both and/or worse. The US is attacking other ME countries (murdering for oil, hegemony) - so we suppose that the US is 'co-defendant' here.

Prosecution gives summary; no one stops the Israeli crimes, not the UN, the US, UK or any other SQSHsO, the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs almost always favour the Zionist lying hasbarah over the truth; the Jews are portrayed as the eternal victims - when it's the ELO/Os who a) suffer aggressive attack including being murdered, b) are improperly dispossessed = Israel squats on stolen land/property - and c) so it criminally goes.

A real shocker, 64+ years since the Nakba.

Then the judge's Q: How do you say?

Jury: Guilty, your honour.

-=*end*=-

^ Update, 14:41; PS Arrrgh! Left something out, namely:

opportunity The Holocaust; Jews preying on (questionably invoked) sympathy.

This is *not* to doubt the gas-ovens, merely to query the numbers being spruiked. One thing almost everyone should know by now, is that the Jews/Zionists are *inveterate liars*. They even have a special name for lies in connection to Israel, namely 'hasbarah' = 'explanation.' We *know* that hasbarah includes lies, since hasbarah *never* admits to the quite visible fact, verifiable by the most casual inspection - that Israel illegally, immorally squats on stolen land/property. That they must lie is explained by the 'natural' phenomenon, that criminals can never afford to tell the truth about their own crimes - else they would convict themselves. 'Nice' little loop!

The 'push' to steal most of Palestine was well underway before WW2, but most of the real action (= crimes against humanity) took place after - making their constant harping on 'the Holocaust' little more than cynical manipulation. Jabotinsky's strategy means permanent war - just how sustainable do you think that might be? IMHO, it indicates mental-retardation of the entire Zionist group, plus most = at the very least 50%+1 of the diaspora. IF that diaspora did not accept the lies THEN they would get a bit vocal - one might think, since the obviously criminal 'Zionist project' reflects negatively on *all* Jews, *everywhere*.

[«back»]

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] Zionism  n. movement for the establishment and development of a Jewish nation in what was pre-UNGA181 Palestine.  Zionist n. & adj. [POD] [modified]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

[3] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [ibid.]

[4] crime  n. 1 a offence punishable by law. b illegal acts (resorted to crime). 2 evil act (crime against humanity). 3 colloq. shameful act. [Latin crimen] [ibid.]
criminal  -n. person guilty of a crime. [ibid.]

[5] accessory  n. (pl. -ies) 1 additional or extra thing. 2 (usu. in pl.) small attachment, fitting, or subsidiary item of dress (e.g. shoes, gloves). 3 (often foll. by to) person who abets or is privy to an (esp. illegal) act. [medieval Latin: related to *accede][ibid.]

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe

bipedal brutal pigs

Murdering thieves squatting on stolen land.

Jabotinsky, 1923: "the gloves have to be off" [= criminal violence.] "Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer" [= grave intellectual failure.]

What it means: Permanent war (at least until all mostly Palestinian, hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers, their heirs and successors are - 'neutralised,' usually by being killed.)

Ben-Gurion (1936-39): "... we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, ..."

Apart from the miserable few % of Palestine that the immigrating (often illegally = alien-invading) Jews managed to buy before the Arabs truly appreciated the danger, *all* the land occupied by Israel is improperly alienated = ethnically cleansed by genocidal methods = product of dispossession (recalls 3rd Reich Lebensraum), and as per the 'home-burglary' analogy, must be revested (UNGA194 = 'right of [refugee] return'), and the hapless victims adequately recompensed as part of illegal, Nuremberg-class war reparations, and the perpetrators + accessories appropriately punished.

-=*=-

PS The quotes in more extended form:

1. Herzl(1897): "Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor [Palestinians] must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."

2. Jabotinsky(~1923): "No native population would stomach the intrusion of another nation into their territory. So the gloves have to be off. Unremitting force is viewed as the only answer to Arab objections to Zionist control of the territory."

3. Ben-Gurion(1936-39): "“We must see the situation for what it is. ... But in the political field we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, ..."

Sooo; exactly who are the attackers, who are the defenders - in/around Israel = mostly stolen Palestine?

The status quo is a devastating indictment of 'world managers' = tyrants, proof by performance, proof by result.

The truly amazing thing is that the tyrants think they can get off scot-free?