the US not only supports terrorism they lie about it, wringing hands as they pour petrol on the fire

.. CIA et al. organising ...

  .. mercenaries entering ...

    .. armed by third parties ...

      .. typical democratic revolution

Thesis/Subtitle: just a NY conversation rattling in my head

-=*=-
 
 [update, 15:41]

-=*=-

The scene: Water-cooler, UN-tower, NY.

Kofi: "Did you read the NYT report?"

Ban: "What report was that?"

Kofi: "The one that says “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition.”"

Ban: "Aw, why would the C.I.A. wanna do that?"

Kofi: "Search me. BTW, did you hear about the terrorist bombing of Assad's security head-office?"

Ban: "Aw, why would peaceful 'activists' wanna do that?"

-=*=-

The 'responsibility to protect' crew, from the (rogue) US regime (previous exploit: "Shock'n whore" in Iraq), the (equally rogue) Zionist regime (illegally squatting on land/property stolen from mostly Palestine ELO/Os), the mainly 'Western' bunch of SQSHsO (previous F+UK/NATO exploit: smashing Libya), the odd NGO (HRW, NED et al.) and their corrupt & venal handmaidens, the MSM + PFBCS, right down to the many deluded (ppp-dd'd) citizens, are all rubbing their hands with glee as they contemplate the coming slaughter in Syria reaching its 'high point' with the defeat of Assad (and the concomitant descent into Hell for most Syrians, whatever they may want, or not).

(Nobody of note speaks up for truth and justice - why not?)

Fazit: Go for it; typical democratic revolution!

-=*end*=-

^ Update, 15:41; PS (prevention better than cure?)

More NY conversation:

Kofi: "Do you think the people will catch on?"

Ban: "Nah - thick as two short planks."

Recent article:

Hundreds killed as battle for Damascus continues
Updated July 19, 2012 20:50:58
  «UN chief Ban Ki-moon and international envoy Kofi Annan called on the Security Council to take strong action, but Russia and China are expected to veto the resolution.
Mr Ban said there was an "extreme urgency" for action to halt the violence which activists say has killed more than 17,000 people.
Mr Annan, the UN-Arab League envoy, said the council must take "decisive" action after he persuaded the major powers to postpone the vote originally set for Wednesday.
...
British prime minister David Cameron said it was time for Syrian president Bashar al-Assad to go to prevent civil war in the country.» 
[AusBC/'news' July 19]

Comment 1: Ban Ki-moon's job is *not* to lobby.

Comment 2: Nor is it Kofi Annan's.

Comment 3: So raving about "extreme urgency" or "decisive" action is none of their (poor, achy breaky hearts') business.

Comment 4: What these two 'gentlemen' are angling for, *pressuring* for (even possibly blackmailing; see below), is a UNSC resolution under Ch7 = war-*enabling*.

Comment 5: In case a reminder is required, the UN's supposed business is to *prevent* war, not enable/incite it.

Comment 6: As well as these corrupt UN officials, SQSHsO stick their 'oars' in, here Cameron. It is *no-one's* business, except for the fully and fairly informed Syrians in a proper referendum, to decide the fate of Syria.

-=*=-

The above cited article was revised; one change was to delete a reference:

Army battles rebels for control of Damascus
Updated July 17, 2012 12:30:03
  «"To our great regret, we are seeing elements of blackmail," Mr Lavrov told a news conference before Mr Annan started a two-day visit that will include talks today with president Vladimir Putin. "This is a counter-productive and a dangerous approach."
Mr Lavrov said both sides in the conflict should stop fighting and start negotiations.» 
[AusBC/'news' July 17]

Comment 1: There you have it: Annan threatens Russia. Ban Ki-moon most likely ditto, vis-à-vis China.

Ban&Kofi together: "Oh, shit! Sprung!"

Comment 2: Lavrov knows what he's calling for: *Both* sides to stop = the 'rebels' attacking and the govt. defending. But the so-called 'rebels' won't stop - just as in Libya, they have an (externally) assigned task, to keep the vicious, murdering outrages going (El Salvador option = US-sponsored death-squads) - until Syria capitulates, and IF that means only as a complete rubble THEN so be it. One presumes that the mercenaries get more $s the longer it takes = the greater the suffering for the hapless Syrian people (mercenary SOP = mass-murder, per diem).

-=*=-

But, of course, it's worse than that. US, the so-called 'world-leader' barges around the world - concentrating on the 'oil-sands of the planet,' smashing little countries to grab advantage; either to steal oil (Iraq, Libya; control + 'economic rent'), pipeline routes and/or minerals AND heroin (Afghanistan), land/hegemony (latest Syria, Golan Heights for Israel, road to Tehran for US neoCons), even more oil (Iran in the planning) - and gets help from all directions; SQSHsO, UN, NGOs & *NOBODY EFFECTIVELY OBJECTS*.

That's some shitty system; a world totally without (good) ethics, and the 'shining light on the hill' mass-murdering for spoil.

Repeat; consider this: The violence in Syria could be stopped in an instant - IF the US were to call off its dogs of war - but that would only be honest & fair - *not* a US speciality (massive understatement).

[«back»]

-=*=-

Ref(s):

Abbreviations:

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down