criminality vs. credibility
 US/Zs murdering for spoil
  who will purge this scourge?

.. all those ...

  .. who aid criminals ...

    .. make themselves accessories

Thesis/Subtitle: the essential difference between the US/Z-plex and the 3rd Reich is - 'better' PRopaganda

Concomitant: Those who transmit the *lying* PRopaganda, even actively augmenting it - are equally guilty of the perpetrators' crimes, by the accessory mechanism

 [update, 17:09]


Preamble: That the US/Z-plex is murdering for spoil can hardly be contested; The Zs = 'people not from there (Palestine)' = aggressive alien invaders - have stolen most of the ELO/Os' land/property, at the point of guns/bombs; see Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin massacre & all such outrages before and since. That this started long before UNGA181 (= corrupt UN) is irrelevant; the crime exists and is allowed to persist. Similarly the US' criminality; see Blum/Killing Hope.

Say one thing, do another: the US (MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood) dominates the 'Western' media = MSM/PFBCs and the Z-hasbarahists project their vile lies, but only the sub-optimally aware are taken in. It should be noted that fooling gullible people is a) never nice but b) when the fooling is in the aid of crime then such fooling is itself criminal.

The US/Z-plex claim to be and champion democracies - but no democracy can function properly when the electorate is deceived = such democracies are sham.

That it is the function of the MSM/PFBCs to report on the above *but* their responsibility is honoured largely in the breach makes the MSM/PFBCs accessories to capital crimes.

End preamble.


Trigger article 1:

Massacre fears as Syrian troops assault Aleppo
Updated July 29, 2012 05:31:44
  «World leaders are worried about a repeat of other massacres in Syria this year, after government troops slaughtered civilians in the towns of Taramseh, Houla, Homs, and Kubeir, among others.» 

Comment: Blatant lies via/assisted by AusBC. Thanks to a report from the FAZ contradicting the MSM/PFBCs, we know that the perpetrators at Houla were *not* Assad's forces or militias, and from other reports, that those killed at Taramseh were almost all 'rebels.' One lie is enough, here two, to kill all credibility.

Trigger article 2:

Syrian military tightens grip on Aleppo
ABC correspondent Norman Hermant and wires
Updated July 31, 2012 12:48:04
  «I’ve seen some old and some new Russian made weapons. Today I saw two NATO issue weapons - an assault rifle similar to, in fact exactly the same as what Australian soldiers use, and sniper rifle.» 
[AusBC/Norman Hermant, Matt Brown]

Comment 1: This (inadvertent?) admission via the AusBC *proves* the so-called 'rebels' are deploying sniper weapons, also that the 'rebels' are getting NATO weapons. Oh! Imagine that, invading alien-mercenaries, equipped by NATO. Repeating: It makes *no* sense for Assad to 'kill his own people,' but every sense for the 'rebels' = partly paid mercenary/psychopaths to do so.

Comment 2: The use of sniper allegations aimed at Assad, as allegations of Assad 'killing his own people' parallel similar allegations aimed at Gaddafi in Libya, and Saddam in Iraq. Same modus operandi from the very same perpetrators, same aim = murdering for spoil.


Fazit: 'Fooling' people is never nice, but when the fooling a) destroys the correct functioning of democracies and b) - far worse, 'enables' murdering for spoil, THEN such 'fooling' = criminality.

Take a bow, AusBC. Strictly speaking, the bow should precede climbing onto a tumbrel.


Update, 17:09; PS - democracy vs. 'public opinion:'

  «The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.» 

Well, the "men we have never heard of" speak to us via, often *actively assisted* by, the MSM/PFBCs, themselves almost totally dominated by the US-MMH. It's not to say that there are no 'independent' voices, nor that the internet plays no part - of course we bloggers do, but sadly so far only 'sotto voce,' and thus to no great effect - yet. By-and-large, so far the masses dream on; sated by home-delivered pizza & Hollywood fantasies via their easy-come wide-flats - say.

But WHEN (note, not IF) the slumbering masses wake up, our so-called 'leaders' (= un- & anti-democratic tyrants) better watch-out.

1st comes disbelief: *Surely* they wouldn't lie to us?

2st comes the truth: The bastards!

3rd comes the anger: Tumbrels!


Not so aside:

The *proof* that 'they' lie to us is the continued 'existence' of Israel; no just person would ever allow, not for the smallest part of a pico-sec, the armed theft and consequent squatting on stolen land/property - that the invading Zionists did, and the current Israelis continue to 'enjoy.' It is an injustice of the 'highest' order; *all* the perpetrators, including their heirs & successors should be brought to (Nurembertg-class = gallows) justice. Oh! Plus their apologists, a nest thereof infest the AusBC + Aus govt..



Those with eyes open wide enough can see: The US/Zs marauding (v. 1 make a plundering raid (on). 2 pilfer systematically.  marauder n. [French maraud rogue][POD])

To the Q: Why can't the US just *buy* oil, the answer 'is not simple,' but includes a) economic rent (aka the US-fat cats want the lot), b) $US = fiat currency ('print, print, ...'), forced on the world (Q: Why do *we, the people* accede? A: Given no choice; see ppp-dd'd = inoperative democracies) and c) sheer, unadulterated hubristic greed. Oh, plus they have guns (instead of, say, brains or d**ks; probably both.)

To the Q: Why can't the Zs just *buy* soil, the answer *is* simple; *no-one*, a) here Palestinians in particular, b) Arabs/Muslims more in general, but finally c) *universally*, repeat *no-one* wants Jews anywhere even remotely in the neighbourhood. Plus, just like the Yanks, all Zs would just *die* without their guns. IMHO, can't happen too fast.

2nd last word: One could think: Well, that's only the US/Zs - but one would be wrong; between us (we the people) and them (the vicious, murdering-to-steal criminals) stand not just the corrupt&venal MSM+PFBCs, but also our own so-called 'representatives' in all the so-called 'Western' SQSHsO. When the revolution comes, it's coming to all our so-called 'rulers' - for they are betraying us.

Last word (for now): It's wrong (my opinion) - or it's not = I'm wrong. So, just for you, dear reader, a Q: Do you wish to live in a world ruled by lying, murdering tyrants, or is there a better way?




ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe


slaughter in Syria
 mostly US' fault
  plus F+UK&Tr

.. subvert ppp-dd's ...

  .. hijack their revolution ...

    .. then send in death squads

Thesis/Subtitle: it's the US' (F+UK/NATO) latest modus operandi; just did it to Libya - country smashed

Corollary: Russia and China 'let' Libya happen - idiots; and for *not* stopping the carnage, they bear some part of the guilt


Trigger article:

World fears slaughter and devastation in Aleppo
By Norman Hermant, wires
Updated July 28, 2012 09:45:29
  «World leaders are warning of an imminent bloody showdown in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo.
The United Nations, along with the US, Britain, France and Turkey, fears for the safety of civilians in the city.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, has urged rebels in the city, and the government forces surrounding them, to spare civilians.
"I have been receiving as yet unconfirmed reports of atrocities, including extra-judicial killings and shootings of civilians by snipers, that took place during the recent fighting in various suburbs of Damascus," she said in a statement.»

Comment 1: As well as US(F+UK/NATO), the UN 'helped' the rape of Libya - thus emboldened, the UN (executive) are now *active* warmongers.

Comment 2: As the UN, so UN-orgs, and some NGOs (HRW, say.) Pillay was an *active* warmonger in Libya, now in Syria too.


Fazit: There would be next-to-no problem, had 'the West' = US, F+UK/NATO, now Tr (Erdoğan is finished as 'honest' - if he ever was), the killing is mostly being done by externally supported, also by imported mercenaries; Assad *is* a decent man and would not 'kill his own people' (although in wars, some innocents will be dragged in.)

One proof: Pillay's quote ("atrocities, including extra-judicial killings and shootings of civilians by snipers") - pure PRopaganda. Snipers work from cover; IF snipers active THEN most likely US-sponsored death-squads. The US has form. They just don't care about who they kill, how many, or the damage they do. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, now Syria and Iran next - Wesley Clark told us the Pentagon's plans (how we're going to take out seven countries in five years) in advance.



 as practiced
  in 'the West'
   does not work

.. and this ...

  .. has serious ...

    .. consequences

Thesis/Subtitle: in our democracies, the people supposedly delegate power to representatives

Corollary: IF the representatives do *not* properly represent THEN they make themselves rogue


Preamble: (Partly from my "how do you like being lied to?") 'They' (some amorphous and/or anonymous 'authority,' with or without remit) maintain that we (Anglo/Judaic/'the West') live in democracies, 'the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried ...' Recall that Churchill was a politician AND that "All politicians lie!" - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to Howard.

Now, it is easy enough to prove that our democracies are not working properly (massive understatement), see repeat of preamble to my "full-spectrum dominance" as lemma[3] below. Specifically here, when we (the people = voters) are lied to (in the case of secrets and/or covert operations = lies of omission), it is done to deceive us, and deceived voters may not make properly informed decisions. Thus IF lied to (by representatives, our so-called 'leaders') THEN the democratic covenant is broken AND the transfer of sovereignty from the people to the representatives becomes 'inoperative' = the leaders lose any mandate = any/all subsequent action by such leaders = illegitimate.

This has serious consequences; IF a representative has no mandate THEN s/he may not even 'operate' in a democratic frame; ALL actions are illegitimate AND ordering murder especially; such a representative is an outlaw and *must* be brought to justice.

End preamble.


Trigger article 1:

Middle East
Jul 24, 2012
The rise and fall of Turkey's Erdogan
By M K Bhadrakumar
  «The emergent operational plan is that while Ankara steps up the covert operations inside Syria (bankrolled by Saudi Arabia and Qatar), Israel will cross the border into Syria from the south and attack Bashar's military and degrade its capacity to resist the Turkish threat.
Turkey has stepped up the psywar, projecting through the media that the Syrian regime is already tottering. Turkish commentators are spreading the word. Murat Yetkin of the establishment daily Hurriyet quoted a Turkish official as saying,
Our people [Turkish intelligence] in the field are observing that the urban majority, which has preferred to remain neutral so far, has begun to support the opposition groups. We think the Syrian people have begun to perceive that the administration is breaking up.»

Comment 1; note: "covert operations inside Syria (bankrolled by Saudi Arabia and Qatar),"

Comment 2; note: "the urban majority, which has preferred to remain neutral so far" - how odd is that? We are told (via the corrupt&venal MSM+PFBCs) that the Syrian people are agitating = they actually started the 'crisis?' How could they have done, if the urban majority "remain neutral so far?" This is proof that any agitation is by a minority, which again means no mandate - for the instigator/invaders.

Trigger article 2:

Jul 24, 2012
German intelligence: al-Qaeda all over Syria
By John Rosenthal
  «German intelligence estimates that "around 90" terror attacks that "can be attributed to organizations that are close to al-Qaeda or jihadist groups" were carried out in Syria between the end of December and the beginning of July, as reported by the German daily Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). This was revealed by the German government in a response to a parliamentary question.
In response to the same question, the German government admitted that it had received several reports from the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, on the May 25 massacre in the Syrian town of Houla. But it noted that the content of these reports was to remain classified "by reason of national interest", Like many other Western governments, Germany expelled Syria's ambassador in the immediate aftermath of the massacre, holding the Syrian government responsible for the violence.
While France, the United Kingdom, and the United States have figured as the most visible Western powers supporting the rebellion, Germany has been quietly playing a major role behind the scenes. According to a new report in the FAZ, the German foreign office is working with representatives of the Syrian opposition to develop "concrete plans" for a "political transition" in Syria following the fall of Assad.»

Comment 1; note: "reports from the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, on the May 25 massacre in the Syrian town of Houla." How odd is it, that these reports are "to remain classified?" The corrupt&venal MSM+PFBCs told us 'That Assad did it;' IF so THEN it's no secret BUT obviously, the BND report *must* differ = *not* Assad = MSM+PFBCs lied. As said already, serious consequences.

Comment 2; note: "quietly playing a major role behind the scenes."


Argument, general: Recall that in Aus, one votes by ranking candidates in order of preference. Do you (honestly) think that such a process can allow one to choose some preferable future, whereby the will of the majority is determined, and so their preferred policies are to be implemented?

Further, does this process provide a mechanism to delegate voter power to representatives, enabling those representatives to order the slaughter of other human beings in the name of 'regime change?'

Specifically, IF representatives indulge in secret/covert operations, THEN they do *not* have a mandate, by definition.


Fazit: As long as representatives operate without mandates, we do *not* live in properly functioning democracies, nor do we live in societies under 'the rule of law.' Bah! Repeat: Rogue representatives *must* be brought to justice.



[1] democracy  n. (pl. -ies) 1 a government by the whole population, usu. through elected representatives. b State so governed. 2 classless and tolerant society. [Greek demokratia rule of the people] [POD]

[2] rogue  n. 1 dishonest or unprincipled person. 2 joc. mischievous person, esp. a child. 3 (usu. attrib.) wild fierce animal driven away or living apart from others (rogue elephant). 4 (often attrib.) inexplicably aberrant result or phenomenon; inferior or defective specimen. [origin unknown] [ibid.]  

[3] Lemma:

1. Lying is a pre- & post-requisite to crime; lies are deployed to deceive, deception is done with malice-aforethought and after any crime, the perpetrators have to lie to avoid self-incrimination. There is no such thing as a 'harmless' lie.

2. It is easy to prove that 'our' democracies (our = Anglo (US, UK, Aus), Judaic = IL, 'the West' adds D, F and other SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on) - are sham; of three pre-requisites (fully and honestly informed voters, sufficiently wide choice of candidates, elected representatives who implement the will of the majority while protecting minorities) - we fail all three.

3. It is easy to see that we have no worthwhile 'rule of law,' since the UN whose founding purpose was to prevent war, dismally has not - in fact quite the opposite; from at the latest UNGA181 (subsequent improper dispossession of Palestinian land/property via genocidal methods - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to the Zionists), down to 2001+ = aggressive invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria (current moment), Iran (probably next in the US' target-list). Also (fundamental), note that only just law may earn respect - one 'best' (= worst) example, 'war on drugs.' Adequate data exists to prove 'decriminalisation' gives a *much* better, possibly the best result.

End lemma.



ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe


in Syria there is:
 an hourly 'Aurora'
  a daily 'Utøya' or two

.. nobody cares except ...

  .. the innocent victims ...

    .. and us, we the anti-wars

Thesis/Subtitle: doing nothing cannot stop the criminals


Assad inherited an old system.

That the system was not perfect is clear - where is a perfect system?

Assad tried to improve the economic system; for example some neoliberal 'reforms' were attempted - leading to some unhappiness - as neoliberal reforms tend to do.

Assad tried to improve the political system; recently there were elections and political reforms; well over half the people voted - despite the opposition calling for a boycott. Download a video or the transcript of Assad discussing such things; decide for yourself: Is this what a monster looks/sounds like?

The point here is, that Assad tried to play the game and improve Syria.

But in contrast, some, mostly young people, thought 'life could be better' - on the Hollywood-dream model brought to them via TV (mostly devised & broadcast by non-disinterested parties). They must have learned the characteristic double-two-finger 'revolution' gesture somewhere.

Then, when the 'Arab Spring' came to Syria, long-stored plans were put into effect.

Externally supported subversives infiltrated genuine 'democracy' movements, and some peaceful demonstrations were turned ugly.

Assad's forces tried to restore peace, and the trap had been sprung.

Now the 'activists' are being armed (US-proxies Saudi Arabia and Qatar) and assisted by invading mercenaries.

Thanks to the NYT, we know that the CIA is assisting, with 'non-lethal aid' (or so they say, but who in this entire story is *not* lying?) 'Non-lethal aid' means communications equipment (satellite phones, PC-communications (Skype, video-uploads)), intel-advice (satellite photos = where best to attack the govt. and/or people), training and who knows what other etc.s.

The external interferers *do not care* how many people are slaughtered, also not by whom, although the US has looong experience in developing the El-Salvador option = death squads.

  «The US Ambassador to Syria (appointed in January 2011), Robert Stephen Ford had been part of Negroponte's team at the US Embassy in Baghdad (2004-2005). In this regard, "The Salvador Option" for Iraq laid the groundwork for the launching of an armed insurgency in Syria in March 2011.» 

We know that the US had Syria on its 'kill-list,' Wesley Clark told us so:

  «"This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."» 

When a 'revolution' is hijacked, when mercenaries flood in, it is *not* a civil war anymore (assuming it ever was - so-called 'peaceful' protesters lose all legitimacy when they turn violent - and start killing). For proof, look to Palestine; not so long before UNGA181 there were very few Jews in Palestine, then came waves of self-claimed Jewish immigrants, often illegally (the UK had tried to stop the flood). If the number of alien-arrivals is high enough, it is no longer immigration but an alien invasion. The point is, that when the Zionist terrorists (obviously superior in both numbers and arms) attacked the hapless ELO/Os, driving the ELO/Os off and subsequently improperly alienating the ELO/Os' land and property (Plan Dalet, Deir Yassin massacre etc.), the hasbarah-ists claimed that the Jews had won a 'civil war.' Given that hasbarah-ists are among the filthiest liars on the planet, as soon as they claim something, you may assume the diametric opposite is true.

It is not known to me how many 'rotten apples' (= US-sponsored death-squads, say) it would need, but there are obviously enough in Syria to perpetrate the outrages we are seeing reported in the MSM+PFBCs, i.e. the analogue of an hourly 'Aurora' and a daily 'Utøya' or two - in size, scope, frequency and outright brutality.

To claim that these outrages are being perpetrated by Assad-related forces is bizarre - how could Assad possibly benefit by 'killing his own people?' Ergo, any claims of 'Assad did it' must be (99%) lying PRopaganda. Having said that, accidents - or traps - may happen.

Yet that 'Assad did it' is the exact claim made daily, hourly, by our (corrupt&venal) MSM+PFBCs.

US, Zs, F+UK and NATO have form = they've done the same or similar successively to Palestine (Zs, pre/post-1947 down to 'current moment'), Afghanistan (US, 2001+), Iraq (B, B & H + CoWs) & Libya (F+UK and NATO) in the recent past. There too, the US+ does not care how many they kill, or cause to have killed (when the killing can be carried out by local proxies, consciously in US-service or not). What counts is the number killed - but since Viet Nam, the US doesn't do body-counts. We know from the Lancet that they stopped counting after 600,000 deaths in Iraq. The true figure may approximate 1.4mio+, with ~2mio internally displaced and ~2mio outright fled. Repeating the point; the US doesn't care how many they kill, nor the Zs (just look and see how often they slaughter their neighbours, down through the years), now F+UK and NATO have caught the US-disease and don't care how many they kill either.


Sooo, Q: Who's to blame for the rape of Syria?

A1: The Assad regime, vulnerable by not being perfect.

A2: The so-called 'peaceful' protesters IF it was they who turned violent - and start killing.

A3: The fomenters and subversives, externally instigated, the finger-prints of the US&/Zs are all over it, then those providing arms, and the criminal, murdering mercenaries.

A4: The rogue-regimes, not only of the perpetrators, but all the SQSHsO who offer assistance, support or even merely non-resistance. (Silence helps the criminals too.)

A5: The corrupt&venal MSM+PFBCs, who transmit and often *actively assist* the lying narratives spewing out of our TVs.

A5: The churches; they should be absolutely raging, condemning the externally instigated/invading murderers and calling for peace - but all we get from the churches is a deafening silence.

A6: The people, for allowing themselves to be ppp-dd'd.

A7: *Not* us, we the active anti-wars.




ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe


little lies
 hide bigger sins
  the biggest sin is to kill

.. lie = deceit = dishonest = loser ...

  .. it's all in the framing; crooked frame = argument fail ...

    .. one lie is enough; no harmless lies but to lie with intent is criminal

Thesis/Subtitle: means, motive, opportunity + modus operandi & cui bono = crime descriptors

Concomitant: criminal behaviour occurs everywhere someone gets hurt


Musing: “There are eight squillion frames in the blogosphere; this presents one of them”

Framing (1)   «Framing effect is an example of cognitive bias, in which people react differently to a particular choice depending on whether it is presented as a loss or as a gain.» 

Framing (2)   «Framing, a term used in media studies, sociology, and psychology, refers to the social construction of a social phenomenon by mass media sources or specific political or social movements or organizations. It is an inevitable process of selective influence over the individual's perception of the meanings attributed to words or phrases. A frame defines the packaging of an element of rhetoric in such a way as to encourage certain interpretations and to discourage others.» 

There are two frames in consideration here; a) 'what they say,' and b) 'what they actually do.'


Case study 1:

Martin Bryant (Port Arthur massacre of 28 April 1996.)

Anders Breivik (Oslo bombing & Utøya massacre of 22 July 2011)

James Holmes (Aurora massacre of 20 July 2012)

Q: What's in common? A: Individuals + presumed psychopathy; innocents slaughtered.

Public reaction: Massive outrage, wailing and tears.


Case study 2:

Palestine (alien invasion, pre- and post- UNGA181 29 November 1947)

Iraq (alien invasion, 19 March 2003)

Libya (alien bombing, 19 March 2011)

Syria (alien subversion, before and since anti-government protests which began in March 2011)

Iran ("All options!" threats, ever since the Iranians took control of their country back from the US-puppet regime in 1979)

Q: What's in common? A: US&/Zs + presumed psychopathy; innocents slaughtered and land/property/resources alienated from ELO/Os = sovereign owners. In Iran, the aggressive war against the Iranian people is so far 'only' mostly covert, but people are already being killed - by the US/Z aggressors and their proxies.

Public reaction: Not much; at best 'resigned acceptance.'


Trigger article 1:

US shooting suspect 'plotted attack for months'
 By correspondent Jane Cowan in Denver, wires
 Updated July 22, 2012 17:19:10
  «The horrific attack in the Denver suburb of Aurora killed 12 people including a six-year-old girl and wounded 58.» 

Comment: No comment, except to say observe how the MSM+PFBCs work.

Trigger article 2:

Report: Syrian Rebels Responsible for Houla Massacre
Eyewitness accounts and admissions from supposed collaborators say Sunni rebels tried to frame the Assad regime
 by John Glaser, June 09, 2012
  «“According to eyewitness accounts,” the FAZ report continues, “the massacre occurred during this time. Those killed were almost exclusively from families belonging to Houla’s Alawi and Shia minorities. Over 90% of Houla’s population are Sunnis. Several dozen members of a family were slaughtered, which had converted from Sunni to Shia Islam. Members of the Shomaliya, an Alawi family, were also killed, as was the family of a Sunni member of the Syrian parliament who is regarded as a collaborator.”
The report continues: “Immediately following the massacre, the perpetrators are supposed to have filmed their victims and then presented them as Sunni victims in videos posted on the internet.”
Initial eyewitness accounts of the massacre, relayed by major western media outlets and Human Rights Watch, described the massacre as having been the work of Syrian forces and their heavy artillery. But other eyewitness accounts, like those from members of the Monastery of St. James in Qara, Syria, said the attack came from Sunni militants who then tried to frame it as a massacre by the regime, presumably in the hopes that it would provoke a foreign intervention to unseat Assad.»
[antiwar/John Glaser]

Comment 1: Non-MSM report based on an FAZ-report (ex-Germany), neither widely circulated.

Comment 2: This report shows that not only are there different *opinions* 'on offer' = being pushed, mainly by the MSM+PFBCs, but entirely different 'fact sets.' As has been pointed out: Opinion may be free, but facts are fixed. IF different 'facts-sets' are presented THEN at least one set *must* contain lies.

Trigger article 3:

The Enmity Conspiracy, or How War with Iran Became ‘Inevitable’
July 21, 2012
By Trita Parsi
  «What Iran Sees
In the case of Iran’s view of the U.S., the assumed goal is the destruction of the country and replacement of the current regime. All America’s actions are believed to serve this ultimate objective. America is systematic, precise and callous in its pursuit of regime change and the defeat of Iran, the Iranians believe.
What America and the West See
Similarly, the U.S. assumes that all Iranian actions are geared towards winning time to advance their nuclear program and present a nuclear fait accompli.»
[antiwar/thediplomat/Trita Parsi]

Comment 1: A bit different; a so-called 'high-power' commentator giving an attempted 'nuanced' assessment.

Comment 2: This is an example of 'what they say' (the US-'West' version) vs. 'what they actually do' (the Iranian version).

Comment 3: From above, 'one lie is enough;' there is a glaring lie in "the 'West' suspects Iran wants a bomb" meme, in that IF Iran were to A-bomb Israel THEN the retalliation would turn Iran 'into a sheet of radioactive glass' = destroy the country and kill most of the population. Nobody in this world is that stupid, to go down such a path - yet that's the 'complete lie-stopper' almost never mentioned in the MSM+PFBCs.


Discussion: We are drowning in a lie-lake presented to us by our so-called 'leadership,' via and often *actively assisted* by the MSM+PFBCs, no more so than on the Z-crimes against the ELO/Os of Palestine. To lie is to misrepresent fictions as facts, to deny actual facts is done by denialists; both are specialities of hasbarah. Vis-à-vis Israel, perhaps the most bizarre lie is "That Israel seeks peace with its neighbours." Again, all we need is one lie here, and all hasbarah falls in a heap: *Because* Israel squats on 'improperly alienated' (aka stolen) land/property, AND the hapless ELO/Os (including heirs & successors) maintain that their land/property should properly revest, THEN Israel is committed to *permanent* war = contradicts the Z's risible 'peace-fantasy.' Proof: As hasbarahists themselves love to say, the moment Israel disarms is the moment it ceases to exist. The single exception to this scenario is: Unless Israel fully recompenses the ELO/Os, pays acceptable reparations and says a sincere "Sorry!" Now *that's* a practical peace-plan.

Recalling means, motive, opportunity + modus operandi & cui bono, what of Case study 1 vs. Case study 2?

In case study 1, people wonder 'what possible motive?' That the perpetrators are psychopaths is generally accepted, but other than apparent perverse glee at killing, or killing as political act, perhaps, there is no 'normal payback' - like $s, say.

In contrast, case study 2 has multiple motives which I summarise as 'murder for spoil,' the Zs for soil & the US for oil. As usual, 'it is not so simple;' the US also seeks hegemony (aka wants to rule the world), eventually to conquer both Russia and China. The proof is hidden in plain sight; recall 'what they say' vs. 'what they actually do.' What they claim is to be seeking truth, justice & democracy, what they actually do is to lie, destroy, steal (even if only 'control' over) resources, and otherwise dictate to sycophants, victims and the wider world.


Fazit: The world is more than war - but not much more, since the US/Z wars are taking precedence and preventing the world from 'moving on.' (Neoliberalism (generalised; + globalisation, financialisation & massive banking swindles) = ruining economies across the world even including the US, then there's the XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe.) The US/Z PRopaganda-methodology has changed little since Bernays ("conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses") on one hand, and "the Big Lie" on another. On 'modus operandi & cui bono,' the answers are 'always variations on the same' and 'not us, we the people.'

The US/Zs criminality *must* be stopped - 'or else' is obvious.




ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe



.. the path of least resistance ...

  .. may be appreciably shortened ...

    .. by criminal action = murder for spoil

Thesis/Subtitle: the US and Z regimes are the world's worst rogues

Corollary: the evil of WW2 did not go away, it merely changed 'sides'


Trigger article:

Richard Haass, ... president of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Syria: Beyond the UN veto
 Last Modified: 20 Jul 2012 12:26
  «The inability to reach international consensus may lead Western nations to form their own 'coalition of the willing'.
... the opposition has demonstrated an ability to strike successfully in Damascus.
... planning for strikes against Syrian chemical munitions, and preparing for a post-Assad Syria.»

Comment 1: Says it all, really (but still, one *needs* to read the lot).

Comment 2: Nobody, not the UN, the US nor any external other may order 'regime-change' - *only* the resident citizens may do so, and then only in a free and fair, properly constituted referendum.

Comment 3: Expressions like 'international consensus,' as 'the West' are more propaganda-constructs than useful concepts, because a) the *regimes* involved are not themselves representative, b) internal operations (of 3rd parties, here Syria) are none of their business but worse, since c) the situation is not 'all other things being equal' but has largely been created by *external* subversion.

Comment 4: A key phrase from Haass: "planning for strikes against Syrian chemical munitions" is taking on real significance, this morning on radio I heard a threat being made by Israel - to (paraphrased) 'strike against Syrian chemical targets.' This would be one way the baddies may try to circumvent the UNSC and R&C vetoes.

Comment 5: Getting obsessed with war is the wrong thing, better is to seek peace via truth and justice. The US+Zs have form (Iraq to Palestine, backwards), as do F+UK/NATO (latest Libya). Other SQSHsO make up the cast of villains, D for example supplying nuke-capable submarines to the Zs and DK supplying the head NATO-warmonger; the criminal-trail is long and well-populated. The way to stop the rot is a) no more of the same = no more war and b) call the dogs of war off = cease all external subversion.


Charge: Ah! This is all anti-US, anti-Semitic polemic (diatribe, harangue, obloquy)!

Counter: No, 'merely' anti-lying, anti-cheating, anti-theft & anti-murder.

Witness: Wesley Clark (4 Star General, now retd.): "This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."

Musing: What really gives *me* the shits, *apart* from the suffering the 'responsibility to protect' *pretenders* are causing (which is extreme, criminal, and *not* (yet?) prosecuted, from Palestine to the current moment in Syria), are the filthy, filthy *lies*; do one thing (murdering for spoil) while saying another (democracy!) As previously mentioned 'in here,' our 'Western' democracies are sham. Then oil:

  « ... provided an opportunity and pretext to implement long-standing plans to take control of Iraq's immense oil wealth, a central component of the Persian Gulf resources that the State Department, in 1945, described as "a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history"... What matters is control over the "material prize," which funnels enormous wealth to the US in many ways, and the "stupendous source of strategic power," which translates into a lever of “unilateral world domination.”» 

Fazit: It is 'easy' to criticise the US and Z regimes - since they are *proven* to be the world's worst rogues - look only to Palestine, practically an entire country stolen at the point of guns and bombs = genocidal, ethnic-cleansing Zionist terrorism - and the Zs' biggest 'friend' = the US with its own trail of infamy; post-2001 only = the rape of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya (proxy-front = F+UK/NATO) and now smashing Syria to smithereens, with Iran as next.

The world will not see truth + justice = peace before the US+Z regimes are brought to justice


 old dog
  new tricks

.. lying ...

  .. by omission ...

    .. or commission? - both

Thesis/Subtitle: in order to decide how to vote, the people need to be fully and fairly informed - the (assumed) function of publicly financed broadcasters = PFBCs.

Corollary: IF PFBCs lie (by omission OR commission) THEN democracy is damaged (misinformed people can't make properly informed choices) = democracy mortally wounded.

 [update, 10:59]


Trigger article 1:

Hundreds killed as battle for Damascus continues
 Updated July 19, 2012 20:26:18
  «Opposition activists in Syria say fighting has broken out near the government headquarters in Damascus as the battle for the Syrian capital continues.
Related Story: No going back in battle for Damascus: rebels
Related Story: Army battles rebels for control of Damascus
Map: Syrian Arab Republic»
[AusBC/'news' July 19, 2012 20:26:18]

Comment: So far, so crook - for the hapless inhabitants of Syria.

Trigger article 2:

Hundreds killed as battle for Damascus continues
 Updated July 19, 2012 20:50:58
  «[same header intro.]
Related Story: No going back in battle for Damascus: rebels
[ref. deleted]
Map: Syrian Arab Republic»
[AusBC/'news' July 19, 2012 20:50:58]

Comment 1: Same URL; previous state of article lost to the net.

Comment 2; Q: What changed? A: a reference was deleted, and a section attributed to some external reporter was added. The reference is worth chasing up, since it includes: «... likening Western efforts to get Moscow to change its policy as blackmail ... "To our great regret, we are seeing elements of blackmail," Mr Lavrov told a news conference ...»

Comment 3; note: IF 'the West' is blackmailing Russia (and/or China, as I assume) THEN 'the West' has effectively declared war on Russia and/or China. When we hear 'the West' in AusBC reports, I assume 'US(Zs) + SQSHsO.'

Comment 4: What was added was some 'misinformation' = *speculation* as to how the bombing may have been carried out (speculation = by some Assad 'insider'); I suspect that the misinfo is a psyop to distract from the *real story* = possible black-op = by US-sponsored death-squads - say.

Trigger article 3:

Hundreds killed as battle for Damascus continues
 By Middle East correspondent Matt Brown, wires
 Updated July 20, 2012 00:48:04
  «Fighting breaks out near key government buildings in Damascus as Russia and China veto a Security Council resolution to impose sanctions on the Syrian regime.» 
[AusBC/'news' July 20, 2012 00:48:04]

Comment: Now they've added Matt Brown, plus new info.

Trigger article 4:

Assad appears on TV as battle for Damascus continues
 By Middle East correspondent Matt Brown, wires
 Updated July 20, 2012 07:26:52
  «China and Russia veto sanctions against Syria as Bashar al-Assad appears on state TV one day after a bomb attack killed members of his inner circle.» 
[AusBC/'news' July 20, 2012 07:26:52]

Comment: This time, the headline itself is changed, plus more new info.


Discussion: By re-using the same URL, previous versions of the text are lost to the net; it was only by a stroke of (good) luck that I happened to see what was occurring and could document it (and no guarantee that I saw all the AusBC finagling going on here, and certainly I can't be everywhere, all the time).

Speaking from personal experience, I grew up listening (yes, before TV) to the AusBC as my sole (99%) current-affairs source - and I was *gravely misled* over the outrages perpetrated (and never stopped) on the mostly Palestinian ELO/Os; I was *not* informed of the actual facts = aggressive Zionist 'invasion by stealth' and subsequent land/property theft by terrorism = illegal armed force and genocidal ethnic-cleansing by those Zionist invader/terrorists. This stands as my personal proof of AusBC perfidy (here, lying by omission) - since had they told us the real story, I'd hardly have missed it.

Returning to Syria and the UNSC; other reports speak of 'diplomatic failure' (haw; what the US+ wants is a Ch7 = *war-enabling* resolution) but try this:

  «The U.S., she said, will continue to "ratchet up even further" the political and economic pressure on the Assad regime. The U.S. will also, she said, continue to support the peaceful opposition in Syria and to give the armed opposition "non-lethal support."» 

Rice (talking with a 'forked-tongue,' as many such diplomats do), provides us with yet more idiotic oxymorons: "peaceful opposition" and "non-lethal support" - Oh, yeah; assistance being provided to the *murdering* 'rebels,' some/most/all of whom are active due to US(Z) fomenting.


Fazit: 'The West' = US(Zs) + SQSHsO have been aggressively attacking Syria for quite some time; 1st by 'cultural subversion' by catapulting 'soft' propaganda by TV broadcasts (so-called 'news' *and* 'movies' (with not so hidden messages)) into Syria (look to NED et al.), then by recruitment and training of subversives, recruitment and import of mercenaries, providing 'non-lethal military aid' (satellite phones, photies & 'intel/strategy-advice') and actual weapons via proxies Saudi Arabia and Qatar, 'reliably' reported - but who really knows - except the direct perpetrators, the NYT itself reported on CIA involvement. What we *can* see is the (not so) slow-motion smashing of Syria. Imagine the suffering - brought to them, as to far too many others on the US coveted-resource/killing list, by the good ol' US of A.

Repeat; consider this: The violence in Syria could be stopped in an instant - IF the US were to call off its dogs of war - but that would only be honest & fair - *not* a US speciality (massive understatement).


Update, 10:59; PS Clarification:

In case you are wondering Q: "What exactly is the Big Lie here?"

Then A: 'That it's all Assad's fault.'

IMO oh, no, it's not; not even by anywhere approaching a few miserable %s.

In order to demonise someone, it always helps if some facts can be found to hang the vicious disinformation on. As with Saddam & Gaddafi, Assad has some 'unsavoury' circumstances, possibly of his own making. Yes, at least according to MSM+PFBCs reports, demonstrators were mishandled, some even killed - but mostly, Assad and Syria were set-up to be smashed. All three US-targets were fêted by 'the west' in their time, but each offended - by *not* abjectly grovelling before the US' demands. (Generalised as "Gimme!" - usually referring to resources; soil, oil or pipeline-routes and access to most of the heroin crop.)

Here is a great article:

Middle East
Jul 12, 2012
Covering Syria: The information war
By Aisling Byrne
  «The narrative that has been constructed by the Western mainstream media on Syria may seem to be self-evident from the scenes presented on television, but it is a narrative duplicitously promoted and coordinated so as to conceal and facilitate the regime-change project that is part of the war on Iran.
What we are seeing is a new stage of information war intentionally constructed and cast as a simplistic narrative of a struggle for human rights and democracy so as deliberately to exclude other interpretations and any geo-strategic motivation.
The narrative, as CNN puts it, is in essence this: "The vast majority of reports from the ground indicate that government forces are killing citizens in an attempt to wipe out civilians seeking [President Bashar] al-Assad's ouster" - the aim being precisely to elicit a heart-wrenching emotional response in Western audiences that trumps all other considerations and makes the call for Western/Gulf intervention to effect regime change.
But it is a narrative based on distortion, manipulation, lies and videotape.
For their part, the mainstream media bear some responsibility for the slide toward sectarian war in Syria, the victims of which, as always, are civilians. The media's conceptualization of victims and oppressors has in effect eliminated the space for negotiation. Lavrov has warned: "Either we gather everyone with influence at the negotiating table or once again we depart into ideology, where it is declared shamelessly that everything is the fault of the regime, while everyone else are angels and therefore the regime should be changed.
"The way the Syrian crisis is resolved", he advised, "will play an important role in the world tomorrow; whether the world will be based on the UN Charter, or a place where might makes right."»
[atimes/Aisling Byrne]

Comment 1: As usual, one should read it all.

Comment 2: To pick at the last: might, of course, does not make right. Murdering to steal is fully on-par with Nuremberg and as we've seen from only the most recent examples; US (rape of Iraq), F+UK/NATO (rape of Libya) going all the way back to the Z (rape of Palestine), is indistinguishable from Nuremberg.

Comment 3: The greatest problem I have with this *latest* attack by the US+ is that there is not just *no* effective resistance, there is little visible resistance at all; only a few truth & justice seekers such as myself are actively documenting the US+ crimes. Why is there no effective countervailing effort, where are the mostly decent people and their consciences? They can't *all* be so stupid as to believe the hackneyed pro-war propaganda, surely?





PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down


the US not only supports terrorism
 they lie about it, wringing hands
  as they pour petrol on the fire

.. CIA et al. organising ...

  .. mercenaries entering ...

    .. armed by third parties ...

      .. typical democratic revolution

Thesis/Subtitle: just a NY conversation rattling in my head

 [update, 15:41]


The scene: Water-cooler, UN-tower, NY.

Kofi: "Did you read the NYT report?"

Ban: "What report was that?"

Kofi: "The one that says “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition.”"

Ban: "Aw, why would the C.I.A. wanna do that?"

Kofi: "Search me. BTW, did you hear about the terrorist bombing of Assad's security head-office?"

Ban: "Aw, why would peaceful 'activists' wanna do that?"


The 'responsibility to protect' crew, from the (rogue) US regime (previous exploit: "Shock'n whore" in Iraq), the (equally rogue) Zionist regime (illegally squatting on land/property stolen from mostly Palestine ELO/Os), the mainly 'Western' bunch of SQSHsO (previous F+UK/NATO exploit: smashing Libya), the odd NGO (HRW, NED et al.) and their corrupt & venal handmaidens, the MSM + PFBCS, right down to the many deluded (ppp-dd'd) citizens, are all rubbing their hands with glee as they contemplate the coming slaughter in Syria reaching its 'high point' with the defeat of Assad (and the concomitant descent into Hell for most Syrians, whatever they may want, or not).

(Nobody of note speaks up for truth and justice - why not?)

Fazit: Go for it; typical democratic revolution!


Update, 15:41; PS (prevention better than cure?)

More NY conversation:

Kofi: "Do you think the people will catch on?"

Ban: "Nah - thick as two short planks."

Recent article:

Hundreds killed as battle for Damascus continues
Updated July 19, 2012 20:50:58
  «UN chief Ban Ki-moon and international envoy Kofi Annan called on the Security Council to take strong action, but Russia and China are expected to veto the resolution.
Mr Ban said there was an "extreme urgency" for action to halt the violence which activists say has killed more than 17,000 people.
Mr Annan, the UN-Arab League envoy, said the council must take "decisive" action after he persuaded the major powers to postpone the vote originally set for Wednesday.
British prime minister David Cameron said it was time for Syrian president Bashar al-Assad to go to prevent civil war in the country.»
[AusBC/'news' July 19]

Comment 1: Ban Ki-moon's job is *not* to lobby.

Comment 2: Nor is it Kofi Annan's.

Comment 3: So raving about "extreme urgency" or "decisive" action is none of their (poor, achy breaky hearts') business.

Comment 4: What these two 'gentlemen' are angling for, *pressuring* for (even possibly blackmailing; see below), is a UNSC resolution under Ch7 = war-*enabling*.

Comment 5: In case a reminder is required, the UN's supposed business is to *prevent* war, not enable/incite it.

Comment 6: As well as these corrupt UN officials, SQSHsO stick their 'oars' in, here Cameron. It is *no-one's* business, except for the fully and fairly informed Syrians in a proper referendum, to decide the fate of Syria.


The above cited article was revised; one change was to delete a reference:

Army battles rebels for control of Damascus
Updated July 17, 2012 12:30:03
  «"To our great regret, we are seeing elements of blackmail," Mr Lavrov told a news conference before Mr Annan started a two-day visit that will include talks today with president Vladimir Putin. "This is a counter-productive and a dangerous approach."
Mr Lavrov said both sides in the conflict should stop fighting and start negotiations.»
[AusBC/'news' July 17]

Comment 1: There you have it: Annan threatens Russia. Ban Ki-moon most likely ditto, vis-à-vis China.

Ban&Kofi together: "Oh, shit! Sprung!"

Comment 2: Lavrov knows what he's calling for: *Both* sides to stop = the 'rebels' attacking and the govt. defending. But the so-called 'rebels' won't stop - just as in Libya, they have an (externally) assigned task, to keep the vicious, murdering outrages going (El Salvador option = US-sponsored death-squads) - until Syria capitulates, and IF that means only as a complete rubble THEN so be it. One presumes that the mercenaries get more $s the longer it takes = the greater the suffering for the hapless Syrian people (mercenary SOP = mass-murder, per diem).


But, of course, it's worse than that. US, the so-called 'world-leader' barges around the world - concentrating on the 'oil-sands of the planet,' smashing little countries to grab advantage; either to steal oil (Iraq, Libya; control + 'economic rent'), pipeline routes and/or minerals AND heroin (Afghanistan), land/hegemony (latest Syria, Golan Heights for Israel, road to Tehran for US neoCons), even more oil (Iran in the planning) - and gets help from all directions; SQSHsO, UN, NGOs & *NOBODY EFFECTIVELY OBJECTS*.

That's some shitty system; a world totally without (good) ethics, and the 'shining light on the hill' mass-murdering for spoil.

Repeat; consider this: The violence in Syria could be stopped in an instant - IF the US were to call off its dogs of war - but that would only be honest & fair - *not* a US speciality (massive understatement).





PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down


 is not
  an option

.. it is ...

  .. being *forced* ...

    .. upon us, we the people

Thesis/Subtitle: democracy, the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs and ppp-dd'ing

Corollary: Of three prerequisites; 1) fully & fairly informed voters, 2) sufficiently wide choice of candidates and 3) elected representatives who implement the will of the majority (protecting minorities) - we have *none* = our so-called democracies are *sham*.

Proof: With 'regime-changes' in US, UK, Aus & F, we *still* have more war, more of the time. Palestine is an open sore = cancer on the ME (started around UNGA181 then picked at ever since - by largely immigrant Zionists = alien, aggressive invasion), then across the years and now post 9/11 Afghanistan, Iraq & Libya - all smashed, some still being smashed. Iraq remains a ruin, as does Libya ("IPS - Human Rights Now Worse In Libya") and Afghanistan was never anything else but a ruin, at least since the CIA started al-Qaeda. Latest US/Z-project is Syria; read on...

 [update, 17:41]


Trigger article:

No going back in battle for Damascus: rebels
 By Middle East correspondent Anne Barker, wires
 Updated July 18, 2012 09:22:48
  «Syria's rebel army says it has launched a full scale offensive to "liberate" the capital, dubbing the campaign "Operation Damascus Volcano".
Fighting in the capital appears to be worsening, with reports that government forces are deploying tanks and helicopter gunships as they fight to regain control of rebel-held areas.
"There is no going back. The Damascus battle has priority for us. We have started the operation to liberate Damascus," rebel commander Colonel Qassem Saadeddine said.
The Syrian government has vowed it will never let Damascus fall into rebel hands, and one Syrian diplomat, who has now defected to the opposition, has warned that president Bashar al-Assad's regime will not hesitate to use chemical weapons on its own people if it finds itself cornered.»
[AusBC 'news'/Barker]

Comment 1: My 1st reaction, to any of these sad Syrian stories is "This is awful; gotta be stopped!"

Comment 2: My 2nd reaction invariably is "It could be stopped instantly, right now!" - IF the US wanted it stopped. The US would call-off their CIA dogs of war, stop the recruitment, transport and entry of mercenaries and matériel (supplied by Saudi Arabia & Qatar, say) via allied (Turkey, say) or controlled countries (Iraq, say). And, The US+proxies would stop pouring psyop propaganda at the world via the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs = mainly through our TVs (lying s**t gushing out, to land then congeal on our carpets). The fact that none of it, attacks and propaganda both ever stops - tells us?

Comment 3: The AusBC reporter Barker lives in Israel; her 'hosts' hope to benefit - Israel covets the (illegally) occupied Golan Heights and beyond. Ergo, Barker sits in 'enemy territory' - so I wonder how and where she gets her psyop propaganda from? PRopaganda like "will not hesitate to use chemical weapons on its own people," an obvious bit of lying fear-mongering, *plus* setting up a possible black-op.

Comment 4: There are no 'honest brokers' in this story; Annan has gone to Iran then Russia, Ban Ki-moon to China - to seek acquiescence to agressive war against Syria. Q: May we wonder what they are offering as sticks and/or carrots? But suffice it to say, the UN + selected NGOs are now, as they began in 2001+, some latest Libya, all firmly on the pro-war side - which they 'self-dignify' with risible 'responsibility to protect.' Proof of this is seen in A, I, L & now S: Smashed infrastructure and mass-murdered = dead innocents (oh, so cynically termed 'collaterals') - *because* that's all that bombs and bullets can do.

Comment 5: My theme here is 'ignorance' especially as applied to democracy, and the criminality we are immersed in. *No* worthwhile project requires a lie-screen, but the US(Z) war against Syria is *replete* with lies, some of which have now been admitted to, and exposed by, MSM entities like NYT (C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition). Needless to say, even in the middle of confessing sins, the MSM keeps 'catapulting the PRopaganda.'

Comment 6: As well as the 'for-profit' MSM, the PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC are also 'in on the act.' This tells us that those so-called 'responsible' = the governments *actively allow* PFBCs to *transmit* lies to us, and the 'apogee' is reached when the PFBCs *actively augment* the PRopaganda.


Summary: The situation in Syria is complex; whereas it may be true that the troubles started with so-called 'peaceful, pro-democratic protests,' which may have been countered with more force than was advisable, we can't really know the whole truth because the corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs are simply *not* trustworthy, as *proven* from Palestine, across Iraq to Libya, say. Then, it all went 'bad' when the so-called 'rebels' took up arms (just like Libya). Arms supplied, as the mercenary 'helpers,' from outside = externally supported insurrection/invasion - against a legitimate government. Recall, say, the 'Malayan Emergency,' when 'externals' came - to *support* the government, against purely local 'freedom-fighters.' We know why the US(Zs) want to smash Syria and we know that they are contributing to that smashing (a sub-contracted killer cannot provide distance from the true perpetrators), and IF we know, THEN -

Q: What of Annan, Ban Ki-moon, all the 'Western' governments, *and* their PFBCs?

A1: They all *know* that it's a US(Z) 'inside job,' and they lie to us, by omission and commission, by pretending it's all the demonised Assad's fault, allegedly killing his own people, snipers, tanks, heli-gunships and - possibly coming next as a black-op - deploying chemical weapons.

A2: We all know (or should know, if the trouble to 'look outside' the MSM + PFBCs were taken), that the violence could stop in the smallest part of a pico-sec - IF the US(Zs) + UN + NGOs + SQSHsO wanted it to stop. It doesn't stop; that makes those who could stop it the real criminals, recall "responsibility to protect?"


Musing: As for change, none will never happen without action - see Newton's 1st law: Every object continues in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless compelled to change that state by external forces acted upon it.

The object to be changed is our whole way of managing our countries; those entrusted with managing them have not 'merely' failed, they are deliberately destructive - to other countries, and to our own populations.

Our so-called 'representatives' show themselves to be tyrants, not working for us but *against* us.

We could try forcing them to behave, but better would be to 'eliminate the middleman' (tumbrels?) and go exclusively to referendums.


Fazit: As for ignorance, *action* is not an option - it's a *must*.


Update, 17:41; PS

Newer article:

Syrian ministers killed in Damascus bomb attack
 By Middle East correspondent Matt Brown, wires
 Updated July 18, 2012 23:09:03
  «Two groups have claimed responsibility for the explosion.
Liwa al-Islam, an Islamist rebel group whose name means The Brigade of Islam, said in a statement on its Facebook page that it "targeted the cell called the crisis control room in the capital of Damascus."
A spokesman for the group confirmed the claim by telephone.
But the Free Syrian Army (FSA) also claimed responsibility for the attack, according to spokesman Qassim Saadedine.
"This is the volcano we talked about, we have just started," he said.
An FSA statement later announced "the good news of the outstanding operation this morning that targeted the National Security headquarters and the killing" of the officials "responsible for barbaric massacres".»

Comment 1: If two claims are made, one *must* be false = one liar at least. But killers don't care too much about lies - a pre- and post-requisite of all crime.

Comment 2: Bombing targets in towns - usually filled with innocent civilians - was, along with most 'modern terrorism methodology,' invented by the Zionist invaders of Palestine.

Comment 3: We see the barbaric talk (their own words, as they falsely accuse); as soon as the 'peaceful demonstrators' took up arms, they lost any legitimacy. But we know, as in Libya, that those who attack the govt. were a) never peaceful and b) criminal thugs on a mission; here as there externally instigated and supported. One only has to think of the terrible damage caused, the deaths and searing misery for any survivors.

Comment 4: As before, the so-called 'leaders' of the West and corrupt&venal MSM + PFBCs need to be brought to book; since the attempted overthrow of Syria is a Nuremberg-class war crime, all those so-called 'responsible,' the perpetrators and their tools alike, should be hung by the neck until dead. Soonest.





PRopaganda = PR + propaganda

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast)

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed- or dumbing-down


Mme Clinton
 four filthy lies
  in one sentence

.. just who ...

  .. do you think ...

    .. you're kidding, Mrs Clinton?[1]

Thesis/Subtitle: so-called 'breathless' lies from a 'professional' liar


Trigger article:

Egyptian mob taunts Clinton with 'Monica' chant
Updated July 16, 2012 09:55:55
  «"I want to be clear that the United States is not in the business, in Egypt, of choosing winners and losers, even if we could, which, of course, we cannot," Ms Clinton said at the opening of the consulate.» 

Comment 1; 1st lie: The US *is* 'in the business' of interfering, where-/when-ever it wants, effectively all across the world = simply cannot mind their own business; "It's time" - for the US to finally "go home!"

Comment 2; 2nd lie: To specify Egypt as an exception doubles the 1st lie, in that they *have* been interfering in Egypt by supporting the now deposed dictator Mubarak plus the Egyptian military since at the latest the 1979 Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty = an un- and anti-democratic, criminal swindle.

Comment 3; 3rd lie: "choosing winners and losers" is preposterous since they continually 'choose' by US-SOP = lying, cheating, theft & murder, recall the "Economic Hit Man" then see IMF-SAPs, coups (Iran, Guatemala, Chile etc.) and invasions (Vietnam, true tiddlers like Grenada and Panama, then Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya etc.).

Comment 4; 4th lie: "even if we could, which, of course, we cannot," this is risible embroidering; we see that they both can and do, why else the "Ugly American?"


Fazit, Q: Why does the world tolerate such lying-to-murder crooks?



[1] To the tune of a popular song
(About 414,000 results)


three dumb-clucks
 all neatly in one row:
  Mme Clinton, Messrs Ban Ki-moon & Annan

.. these are the sort of people ...

  .. running our world, right ...

    .. down into the ground

Thesis/Subtitle: Mme Clinton, your "indisputable evidence" slip is showing.
About 1,050,000 results

Corollary 1: Those who assist criminals make themselves accessories (Ban Ki-moon & Annan, say.)

Corollary 2: "Be sure your sin will find you out."[bb]


Trigger article 1 (1st of 4806 related articles):

Syrian Regime Deliberately Murdered Civilians - Hillary Clinton - 1 day ago
There was "indisputable evidence" that the Syrian regime had deliberately murdered civilians" in a massacre in the central village of Tremseh ...
  «Clinton said: "As long as the Assad regime continues to wage war against the Syrian people, the international community must keep increasing the pressure on the regime to halt the violence and allow for a political solution to go forward."» 

Comment 1: I suspect this article comes up first because there's a lot of backwards-rowing going on in the corrupt&venal MSM&PFBCs.

Comment 2: Neither Clinton nor anyone else on this planet, *apart* from a healthy majority of fully&fairly informed Syrians, and that in a free&fair referendum, may call for regime-change in Syria. Given the horrendously sad *fact* that Syria is under attack by an externally-supported, illegitimately subverting-insurgency, no such free vote could happen any time soon - as if that might be a priority for the hapless, viciously terrorised inhabitants.

Trigger article 2:

Clinton outraged as evidence emerges of brutal massacre by Assad regime
As many as 220 people may have been killed in Thursday's massacre, which would be the largest of the Syrian revolt so far
Julian Borger and Adam Gabbatt
guardian.co.uk, Friday 13 July 2012 22.05 BST
  «The killings are said to have taken place in the village of Tremseh on Thursday morning, when government forces are alleged to have surrounded residents and opened fire with mortars and artillery. Then an Alawite pro-government militia, the Shabiha, is reported to have moved into Tremseh and started carrying out executions.
Clinton said accounts of the government attack on the village of Tremseh provided "indisputable evidence that the regime deliberately murdered innocent civilians."»

Comment 1: Note the keywords "indisputable evidence," "deliberately murdered" and "innocent civilians."

Comment 2: Note the format; always the same (paraphrasing): 'Activists say Assad's forces brutally murdering his own people = innocent, unarmed and democracy-demanding civilians, including women, children, babies & grand-parents, including by mass-slashing of throats.'

Comment 3: Note also, that the wording and phrasing is deliberately chosen and structured to provoke revulsion and horror in the (mostly not-too-bright) readers. Such psycho-propaganda is designed a) to stun normal thought processes = disable clear reasoning, then b) to 'create consensus' (more like resigned toleration - "What else can we do?") for a military attack on the Assad-regime, *not* to protect any civilians, but to install yet another US/Z-compliant puppet-regime - which will actually further damage the surviving Syrian people's life-styles - just like in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan etc., going back to the hapless refugees ejected from their Palestinian homelands by aggressively invading Zionists over 60 long and bloody years ago - enabled partly by UNGA181 (only just law may earn respect).

Comment 4: If the Assad govt. is smashed, Israel stands a better chance of increasing its (illegal) hold on the Golan Heights and beyond.

Comment 5: If the Assad govt. is smashed, the US will then proceed to smash its next target, Iran, on its hubristic-hegemony way to dominating Russia & China = much of the rest of the US-resisting world, 'incidentally' picking up Iran's oil-patrimony = economic-rent on the way.


AusBC complicity article:

New talks planned in wake of latest Syria massacre
Updated July 14, 2012 10:10:12
  «More and more evidence is slowly emerging of the bloodshed in Tremseh on Thursday. Rebel groups say at least 220 people were killed when government forces began shelling the town at dawn and continued for more than 12 hours.
Witnesses in Tremseh have told of the horrific carnage. They say entire families were killed, with some people executed by the so-called Shabiha - militia groups said to be loyal to the Assad regime.
They say virtually every family in Tremseh has had one or more members killed. Most of the town's population has since fled.»

Comment 1: We now know that most of this text is simply rubbish, see 'Ooops' below.

Comment 2: Barker et al. are so-called news-professionals - but this performance (as far too many others, both from her and her (similarly corrupt?) colleagues) shows that either a) Barker knows less than I do = Barker is completely incompetent, or b) Barker is an outright liar = psycho-propagandiste.

Comment 3: We (the people) pay the AusBC to fully and honestly inform us, so that we (the voters) may exercise our democratic duty. Being lied to totally defeats this objective; best = fire the lot and stick them all in gaol.


Ooops! article (1st found via antiwar):

The New York Times
July 14, 2012
New Details of a Battle Challenge Reports of a Syrian Massacre
  «BEIRUT, Lebanon — New details emerging Saturday about what local Syrian activists called a massacre of civilians near the central city of Hama indicated that it was more likely an uneven clash between the heavily armed Syrian military and local fighters bearing light weapons.» 

Comment 1: Something went wrong; this item and many others in the (corporate = for profit) MSM, with PFBCs perhaps struggling to catch up, show a 180° U-turn, now it's rebels who were attacked and killed, *not* civilians at all. Something went *so* wrong that even the 'mighty' NYT has to revise its 'narrative,' fastest.

Comment 2: Note that even in the NYT's 'row-back,' they can't resist propagandising: "local fighters bearing light weapons" (my emphasis). The weapons cache revealed "included 54 guns, 9 rocket-propelled grenade launchers, 5,000 cartridges, 25 satellite telephones and 24 mortars, the latter looking as if they had been welded by hand." Q: Do you believe mortars = precision instruments, can be "welded by hand?" IF so THEN by very skilful rebels indeed. What of "25 satellite telephones" - we don't have to ask the CIA if they supplied these? But it gets worse:

  «In previous massacres, however, like the one in Houla in late May, there was the immediate synchronization between the long lists of civilian names, the gruesome videos of dead women and children, and corroboration by United Nations observers who faulted the Syrian Army for using tank shells and other heavy weaponry against a civilian area. That is missing in the case of Tremseh.» 
[NYT/'news' ibid.]

Comment: This is blatant 'history-creep;' there is more than sufficient doubt (FAZ, say, [here (antiwar)], [here (original German)], [here (moonofalabama)] and [here (infowars lewrockwel)]) to totally discredit the above NYT distortion of the Houla massacre story. See my above comment on Barker, are the NYT incompetent or deliberate liars?


Discussion: Mme Clinton has been screeching for 'regime-change' ever since the Syrian situation first 'blew up,' and we have every reason to think that the blow-up itself was started, assisted then morphed to aggressive, invasive warfare by the US, possibly Zs, and their SQSHsO accessory-accomplices. Turkey has been 'turned on its head;' from a self-stated friendly regard for all neighbours, it has turned into one of the prime aggressors, hosting rebels and transiting both 'fighters' (= psychopath-mercenaries) and matériel. Erdoğan's name is now mud, his people ashamed (IF not THEN should be, IF they have any decency which is what I expect), and the future of Turkey as a 'world citizen' trashed (here detested US-speak is appropriate, since the US is the 'master-trasher.')

Each time Mme Clinton gets any sort of excuse, she shows her ugly fa... - err, attitude. The US does not own the world - this truth&justice seeker says "Get your filthy claws off our once jewel-like planet!"


Fazit: The US/Z war against the world (= murder for spoil) is wrong, and it must be stopped.

I and my fellow truth&justice seekers are a) on the job and b) already doing as much as we possibly can - but we're not stopping the rot; we need *active* help, and lots of it.

Q: What are all the decent *inactive* people doing, why they are not helping?



[bb] For bible-bashers in need of extended explanation: The adulterer may hide his sin until judgment day. The thief may cover up his crimes and not get caught in this life. Wicked hearts, evil thoughts may remain unexposed before men. Hypocrisy may be hidden for years under a pretense of piety. But the sin of hubris-hegemony will always find you out here and now! For the sake of this message I have called subverting Syria a Nuremberg war crime!



MSM = Mainstream media (print and broadcast).

PFBCs = Publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC.

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on.


the next massacre in Syria
 and the next, and the next,
  till all good Syrians are dead

.. IF you believe ...

  .. all they show on TV ...

    .. THEN you're an unfeeling imbecile


We know that the CIA is aiding the rebels, and that weapons provided by Arab tyrants (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, et al.) plus terrorists, some Al-Qaeda, some from the recent F+UK/NATO outrage = the raping of Libya are flooding into Syria, through 'friendly' neighbours like Turkey.

At the same time, we get MSM + PFBC reports of massacres from 'activists,' all such outrages, according to those reports, attributable to Assad himself, 'his' military or to unofficial, pro-Assad militias.

As if Assad were consciously knitting his own noose.

You believe that?

IF so, THEN that's why I think that you may well be an unfeeling imbecile.



Saudi Arabia plans to fund Syria rebel army
Exclusive: Command centre in Turkey organising weapon supply to opposition
Martin Chulov in Beirut, Ewen MacAskill in Washington, John Densky in Idlib province
guardian.co.uk, Friday 22 June 2012 18.03 BST
  «Officials in the Saudi capital embraced the idea when it was put to them by Arab officials in May, according to sources in three Arab states, around the same time that weapons started to flow across the southern Turkish border into the hands of Free Syria Army leaders.
Turkey has also allowed the establishment of a command centre in Istanbul which is co-ordinating supply lines in consultation with FSA leaders inside Syria. The centre is believed to be staffed by up to 22 people, most of them Syrian nationals.»
[guardian/Chulov, MacAskill & Densky]

Comment: This is not at all new; the subversion efforts instigated mostly by the US go back years. The article, like the one from the NYT on the CIA, is a) propaganda and b) designed to deceive and c) providing 'smoke-cover' for even worse goings-on. What we are seeing in Syria is the terrorisation of an entire nation, à la Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan etc. - all so the US can extend its hubristic hegemony, partly on behalf of the murdering Zionist land/property thieves in Palestine. To believe all they show on TV illustrates defective intelligence, a serious lack of morality and indifference to the real world, and most and worst of all, heartlessly ignoring the suffering of helpless Arab/Muslims being inflicted mainly by the US/Zs, with help from other SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on = criminal, rogue-regimes all.

The suffering of the hapless Syrians must be immense - but not unique, recall Libya, Iraq etc, *millions* killed, *more* millions displaced, basically all at the abject perverted 'pleasure' of the psychopathic US/Z rogue-regimes. The suffering will go on - unless and until the rogues are forcibly stopped.


just how stupid are 'they?'
 you may specify who 'they' are
  shame to *stupidly* ruin the world

.. so we leave it (democratically!) ...

  .. to our 'best and brightest' ...

    .. rulers, to really f**k it up

Thesis/Subtitle: we are supposedly getting the 'best of all possible worlds?'

Corollary: I don't think so - and IF not THEN big trouble


Shortcut: Dear reader, IF you 'believe' what the MSM+PFBCs say, i.e. "Assad did it!" AND you are not interested in having your belief challenged THEN please slink silently away from here.



  «There's a lot of talk about redacted on our TV screens, and there should be, because we're trying to figure out how best to make the world a peaceful place. There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again. You've got to understand the nature of the regime we're dealing with. This is a man who has delayed, denied, deceived the world. For the sake of liberty and justice for all, the United Nations Security Council must act, must act in way to hold this regime to account, must not be fooled, must be relevant to keep the peace.» 
[guess-whose whitehouse archives]

For redacted, substitute Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria or Iran; no significant difference in what the US/F+UK/NATO/SQSHsO have done / will do = smash the country, killing uncounted innocent 'collaterals,' and the 'name of the game' = murder for spoil, US = mostly oil (plus hegemony & hubris; all criminal). Ditto for Palestine, Jewish coveting formalised by Herzl in 1897 = motive, 'great-power' accommodation signalled by Balfour in 1917, method refined by Jabotinsky in 1923, start-gun fired by UNGA in 1947 = opportunity, guns provided by US$s raised by Meir = more method - and the vile&vicious, ethnic-cleansing by genocidal methods = criminal carnage continues down to today = Zs murdering for soil. Same-old same-old; lying, cheating, stealing & killing = outlaw, rogue-regimes. How do they get away with it, why and just who is responsible? End preamble.


I did a google: who did the "Houla massacre"
About 3,400,000 results (time of writing)

The 1st 10:


Summary: 5 MSM+PFBCs (all on the same song-sheet = "Assad did it!"), 1 wiki (noted for doing 'consensus' = "He said, she said" = *not* necessarily truth), 1 video and 3 so-called 'independents.' The rogue-independent juancole stands condemned by his own words; only aangirfan and infowars are worth reading. In addition, I add three articles from my own research.

Search article 1:

Phony ‘Houla Massacre’: How Media Manipulates Public Opinion For Regime Change in Syria
Intelligent skeptics should see through the media’s smoke screen in order to work out what is really going on in Syria
Patrick Henningsen
May 28, 2012
  «If you are still needing an academic tutorial on exactly how the mainstream media is able to generate a completely phony public consensus to support foreign intervention projects, you need look no further than the dangerous, fictional narrative currently being rolled out regarding Syria.» 
[infowars/Patrick Henningsen]

Comment: Worth the trip.

Search article 2:

June 01, 2012
  «Jeffrey D Feltman, a US assistant secretary of state, is reportedly one of the brains behind the CIA death squads. Syria: The terror operation of Jeffrey Feltman
The residents of Houla have stated that the people who carried out the massacre in Houla were the opponents of Assad, in other words, the CIA's death squads.»

Comment: One can find almost anything on the net; funny that sooo many 'independents' disagree with the MSM+PFBCs. Not quite so funny, actually.

Research article 1:

Geneva Conference on Syria Ends in Stalemate as Russia Hangs Tough Against US Extortion; More Hysterical Outbursts by Hillary Clinton; US-NATO Endgame is MicroStates, MiniStates, Partition
Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.
June 30, 2012
  «Tarpley: The current US policy under the Obama administration with Hillary Clinton in the State Department aims at the destruction of all sovereign states on this planet. It’s really rolling the world situation back to the time before the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 which established the regime of modern independent sovereign states.
The desperation of the US and the British comes from their financial bankruptcy, and what they’ve got to do is increase the rate of exploitation and looting and sacking of the entire world economy. In the course of this, they find that any national government is an intolerable obstacle. It gets in their way.»

Comment: Nice - or not; depending on whether you like "the destruction of all [non-US/F+UK+SQSHsO] sovereign states on this planet." Actually, we can dispense with the 'non-' since neoliberalism is destroying US/F+UK+SQSHsO from inside; proof = US, most EU & 'IMF-SAPed' economies (incl. Aus(&ilk), which SAPs itself voluntarily, bipartisanly = un- & anti-democratically.)

Research article 2:

SYRIA: Imperial Arrogance Spells Fatal Over-reach for the US and Western Allies
The United States and its Western allies are behaving increasingly like the doomed emperors of the late Roman Empire
by Finian Cunningham
July 3, 2012
Press TV - 2012-07-02
  «But the absurdity and obscenity of the Geneva meeting is that the mayhem raging in Syria has largely been inflicted on that country by the same Western powers along with their Turk and Arab proxies. Yet, these Western powers pontificated as usual about international law and respect for human rights. (Of course, the dissembling Western media provide a crucial cloak for their masters to hide what is otherwise a sickening farce.)» 
[globalresearch/Finian Cunningham]

Comment: You'd think by now people would be smelling a - err, several rats. In case not, the NYT reported that the CIA was actively assisting attacks against Assad. ('Naturally' the article contains huge amounts of disinformation - as well as confirming CIA subversion.)

Research article 3:

Middle East
Jul 10, 2012
There will be hell to pay for NATO's Holy War
By Pepe Escobar
  «Hillary has just called on "Western powers" and their Arab stooges - the NATOGCC compound [1] that passes for the "international community" - to "make it clear that Russia and China will pay a price because they are holding up progress" regarding weaponized regime change in Syria.
In non-newspeak, this means, "If you block our new war, there will be payback".»
[atimes/Pepe Escobar]

Comment: See elsewhere; Russia and China are 'US targets' too.



1. Crossing a border inbound = invasion.

2. IF (1) AND armed THEN invasion = aggressive.

3. IF (2) AND not defensive THEN aggressive invasion = illegal.

4. IF (3) THEN Nuremberg supreme war crime = gallows for initiators, life in gaol for the rest.

  «To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.» 

Comment 1: Who would doubt that that is exactly what has happened and continues in Palestine (by Jews, 1897 through 1947 down to 'current moment'), then 2001+, predominantly by the US (also F+UK/NATO, various SQSHsO incl. Aus (to our enduring shame)): Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, is happening in Syria or is planned for Iran, with Russia and China as possible 'ultimate' victims?

Comment 2: War was supposedly banished, post WW2, the raison d'être of the UN. Not only did the UN almost instantly fail with UNGA181, the UN is now actively collaborating with aggressors. (The UN is a composite; member-states in the UNGA, a privileged few in the UNSC, and the so-called 'leadership' i.e. Ban Ki-moon, predecessor Kofi Annan. Each 'leg' has failed, is failing.)

Comment 3: The MSM+PFBCs, whose job it is to fully and fairly inform us, we the (democratic-voting) people, instead tell us lies = the rogue-regimes' pro-war propaganda.

Q: Where is truth, where is justice?


Argument; Candidates for the stupid 'they:'

1. The people who pull the triggers, drop the bombs, or push buttons that achieve the same = murdering destruction - *they* are active murderers.

2. The people who give the orders = the military commanders - *they* are murderers, once removed.

3. With 'civilian command of the military,' it is our so-called 'leaders' who instruct the ordering-murderers - *they* are murderers, also once removed. (Little fleas have littler fleas...)

4. Those who assist the above, by relaying and often actively amplifying the rotten, pro-war propaganda = the MSM+PFBCs - *they* are accessories to murderers.

5. Those who manufacture the arms, AND lobby for their use - *they* are accessories to murderers.

6. Those who support the above, in academia, think-tanks, the churches etc. - *they* also are accessories to murderers.

All of the above comprise the M/I/C/4a†-plex; military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament), 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches. The latter should close up shop as utter traitors to their own professed beliefs (try "Thou shalt not kill!") - an ultimate shocker. Then there's the self-explanatory I/J/Z-plex, every single member, all over the world, a filthy criminal - only possible exception genuine, active dissenters.

7. Those who support the above, by blogging (i.e. juancole), by writing (pro-war, pro-criminal trolls), or even 'merely' proselytising 'in the office,' 'down at the pub' or 'out in the street' - *they* are apologists to murderers.

8. Even those who do nothing to oppose the above, by *not* resisting crime, also bear some responsibility for the crimes: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" ~Bourke (Disputed, but who really gives a s**t? = the borderline-evil of wiki). 2nd try: "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." Actually, this is a message directed at Russia and China: If you do not effectively resist the US, you will one day be smashed by the US, as sure as Afghanistan is getting smashed (still, after 10 yrs), Iraq got "Shock'n whore" smashed, Libya got 'no-fly-zone' smashed, Syria is getting 'externally supported subversion' smashed, Iran in the 'wants a nuke' queue - get the picture, yet?


Fazit: Anyone and everyone, who does *not resist* the rogue-regimes to the best of their abilities qualifies fully for the stupid, despicable '*they*.'

In summary, *they* range from otherwise 'normal' people *doing* (i.e. 'defence' force killers), assisting (i.e. compliant workers), right 'down' to non-resisting citizen/voters, plus the more 'professional' class of criminals, those of the M/I/C/4a†-plex, and associated I/J/Z-plex - wicked criminals all, differing only in degree.

*They* are fighting wars for spoil - instead of combining with us, we the people, to build a better world (and on the way reverse XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe). *They* are, instead, crippling our once jewel-like planet's life-supporting biosphere as they murder to steal.

Compare to getting the 'best of all possible worlds.'



MSM = Mainstream media (print and broadcast).

PFBCs = Publicly-financed broadcasters like AusBC.

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on.