PPS to 'vile Z-criminality' proof by direct observation vs. (lying!) hasbarah assertion

.. 1. what I said - burglary/home invasion ...

  .. 2. what I said - UN corruption, accessories ...

    .. 3. warning on wiki - it's quite possibly undermined

Thesis/Subtitle: it is not *who* says, but *what* is said

Concomitant: it's not what's *said* but what's *done*

Corollary: an entity based on crime is illegitimate

-=*=-

Preamble: This post started life as a PPS to my "proof of vile criminality" article, but deserves to stand alone.

The wicked villainy of the I/J/Z-plex in Palestine did not end in 1967 - it is ongoing = continuous to the 'current moment,' as the vicious attacks on Gaza this past week or so clearly demonstrate.

The attacks are illegal; the world's 4th military power, also the world's most militarised entity, on a 'turkey-shoot' against the I/J/Z-plex' hapless victims, armed with little more than AK-47s and fireworks-like = primitive rockets. Israel the aggressive occupier, attacks those the Zs improperly = illegally dispossessed.

For those paying close attention, the attacks are *clearly* illegal, but the illegality is 'masked' to the general public by a) world 'leaders' and b) their running-dogs = MSM + PFBCs erroneous statements = pro-Israel propaganda.

Those who support criminals make themselves criminals by the accessory-process - what a shitty, corrupt world!

There can be no justice without prosecution & restitution.

There can be no peace without justice.

End preamble.

-=*=-

Trigger article 1:

It's Palestinians Who Have the Right to Defend Themselves
The US and Britain stand behind Israel's onslaught on Gaza. Justice requires a change in the balance of forces on the ground
By Seumas Milne
November 21, 2012
"The Guardian"
  «The way western politicians and media have pontificated about Israel's onslaught on Gaza, you'd think it was facing an unprovoked attack from a well-armed foreign power. Israel had every "right to defend itself", Barack Obama declared...
He was echoed by Britain's foreign secretary, William Hague, who declared that the Palestinian Islamists of Hamas bore "principal responsibility" for Israel's bombardment ...
In fact, an examination of the sequence of events over the last month shows that Israel played the decisive role in the military escalation ... and, crucially, the assassination of the Hamas commander Ahmed Jabari last Wednesday during negotiations over a temporary truce.
...
It's that to portray Israel as some kind of victim ... is a grotesque inversion of reality. Israel has after all been in illegal occupation of both the West Bank and Gaza, where most of the population are the families of refugees who were driven out of what is now Israel in 1948, for the past 45 years.» 
[ICH/guardian/Milne]

Comment 1: What I said - burglary/home invasion ...

Comment 2: As I said in my "no, Mr president," perpetrators of a crime, here ethnic cleansing by genocidal methods have *no* right to defend the proceeds of such crime.

-=*=-

Trigger article 2:

Destroying International Law And Moral Norms
How Many Children will Israel Be Allowed To Slaughter?
By Stuart Littlewood
November 20, 2012
  «Despite the piles of dead in Gaza and - for the second time in four years - the row upon row of charred and broken little bodies of children, Western leaders still shirk their duty and call on the two parties to restart the squalid, lopsided peace process that had led nowhere and only serves to give the Israelis more time to consolidate their territorial gains.
Instead of carrying out their responsibilities, they shamelessly shovel their foul mess onto the Palestinians to clean up. What are the Palestinians supposed to negotiate? Why should they have to bargain for their freedom and property with the thugs that stole it?» 
[ICH/Littlewood]

Comment 1: What I said - UN corruption, accessories ...

Comment 2: The Littlewood article lists some more (but I assume not all) UN resolutions Israel violates, then there's the great swag of resolutions that never actually 'made it' - due to US vetoes. *This* is one way how the UN is corrupted; never a good look. Then, there's the UN corruption in respect to Iran; wickedness almost without end.

-=*=-

Trigger article 3:

EI exclusive: a pro-Israel group’s plan to rewrite history on Wikipedia
  «A pro-Israel pressure group is orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged.» 
[whatreallyhappened/electronicintifada]

Comment: IMHO, corruption of wiki is already underway. Take the '47-8 war in Palestine. Wiki claims 'civil war' - whereas I say 'alien invasion.'

Lemma: Wiki's declared m.o. includes favouring opinion (otherwise unsubstantiated, but where so-called 'experts' agree), which may overrule (unconsidered = missing, say) facts. The opportunities for corruption are clear - when, say, wiki favours *Jewish* opinion on Palestinian Qs?

Proof: Jews were in the great *minority* in Palestine, when Herzl revved Zionism up. By Jabotinsky's "Iron Wall," Jewish purchases in Palestine had effectively stalled. Jabotinsky suggested theft-by-violence and that's exactly what was inflicted on the hapless, mostly Palestinian ELO/Os. That's what the immigrant (partly illegal, Aliyah Bet) = *invading* Zs did = aggressive, alien invasion (= Nuremberg-class war crime), *not* civil war. All illegitimacy of Israel proceeds from this obvious, visible crime = murder for soil. QED.

-=*=-

Argument: Almost all the time, from almost all of the 'Western' MSM + PFBCs, we get almost all reports 'as seen' from the (criminal, lying) Israeli side, with only occasional mention from the point of view of Israel's victims (the hapless, mostly Palestinian ELO/Os, their heirs and successors).

My personal proof of press perfidy stems from ~1967, when I was deceived = propagandised by the erring = lying narrative of 'brave' Israel facing unjustified Arab attack; the exact opposite = "grotesque inversion" of reality - thanks, but "No, thanks!" to the AusBC, my almost sole source of 'current affairs' = news. The AusBC, as Israel, remains an un-remedied crime-scene.

-=*=-

Fazit: IF we the people want a better world - and I can't imagine that the great majority doesn't - THEN we have to work for *less* crime, rather than *more* crime = mainly US + Zs' + SQSHsO depredations. Since almost *all* power is out of our, we the people's hands, due to the tyrannical behaviour of our so-called 'leaders,' either those leaders get effectively active (but recall tigers changing their spots) - or we the people will have to get effectively active on behalf of truth and justice, with proper prosecutions of *all* perpetrators = wicked prime offenders + their cowardly accessories.

Suggestion: After prosecution comes punishment (range = gaol -> gallows), plus full reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

-=*=-

Abbreviations:

ELO/Os = hapless erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-CCC = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe